Faraday cup for commissioning and quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning beams at conventional and ultra-high dose rates

Author(s):  
Carla Winterhalter ◽  
Michele Togno ◽  
Konrad Pawel Nesteruk ◽  
Frank Emert ◽  
Serena Psoroulas ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad P. Nesteruk ◽  
Michele Togno ◽  
Martin Grossmann ◽  
Anthony J. Lomax ◽  
Damien C. Weber ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1012
Author(s):  
Shannon Cunningham ◽  
Shelby McCauley ◽  
Kanimozhi Vairamani ◽  
Joseph Speth ◽  
Swati Girdhani ◽  
...  

Ultra-high dose rate radiation has been reported to produce a more favorable toxicity and tumor control profile compared to conventional dose rates that are used for patient treatment. So far, the so-called FLASH effect has been validated for electron, photon and scattered proton beam, but not yet for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). Because PBS is the state-of-the-art delivery modality for proton therapy and constitutes a wide and growing installation base, we determined the benefit of FLASH PBS on skin and soft tissue toxicity. Using a pencil beam scanning nozzle and the plateau region of a 250 MeV proton beam, a uniform physical dose of 35 Gy (toxicity study) or 15 Gy (tumor control study) was delivered to the right hind leg of mice at various dose rates: Sham, Conventional (Conv, 1 Gy/s), Flash60 (57 Gy/s) and Flash115 (115 Gy/s). Acute radiation effects were quantified by measurements of plasma and skin levels of TGF-β1 and skin toxicity scoring. Delayed irradiation response was defined by hind leg contracture as a surrogate of irradiation-induced skin and soft tissue toxicity and by plasma levels of 13 different cytokines (CXCL1, CXCL10, Eotaxin, IL1-beta, IL-6, MCP-1, Mip1alpha, TNF-alpha, TNF-beta, VEGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF and TGF- β1). Plasma and skin levels of TGF-β1, skin toxicity and leg contracture were all significantly decreased in FLASH compared to Conv groups of mice. FLASH and Conv PBS had similar efficacy with regards to growth control of MOC1 and MOC2 head and neck cancer cells transplanted into syngeneic, immunocompetent mice. These results demonstrate consistent delivery of FLASH PBS radiation from 1 to 115 Gy/s in a clinical gantry. Radiation response following delivery of 35 Gy indicates potential benefits of FLASH versus conventional PBS that are related to skin and soft tissue toxicity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (17) ◽  
pp. 175001 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Winterhalter ◽  
E Fura ◽  
Y Tian ◽  
A Aitkenhead ◽  
A Bolsi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. S44-S45 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Gagnon-Moisan ◽  
R. van der Meer ◽  
Z. Chowdhuri ◽  
M. Eichin ◽  
S. Koenig ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 243-250
Author(s):  
Zhong Su ◽  
Wen Hsi ◽  
Julien Forthomme ◽  
Séverine Rossomme

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1100) ◽  
pp. 20190113
Author(s):  
Robert Poel ◽  
Anja Stuessi Lobmaier ◽  
Nicolaus Andratschke ◽  
Jan Unkelbach ◽  
Stephanie Tanadini-Lang ◽  
...  

Objectives: Re-irradiation of recurrent intracranial meningiomas represents a major challenge due to dose limits of critical structures and the necessity of sufficient dose coverage of the recurrent tumor for local control. The aim of this study was to investigate dosimetric differences between pencil beam scanning protons (PBS) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photons for intracranial re-irradiation of meningiomas. Methods: Nine patients who received an initial dose >50 Gy for intracranial meningioma and who were re-irradiated for recurrence were selected for plan comparison. A volumetric modulated arc therapy photon and a pencil beam scanning proton plan were generated (prescription dose: 15 × 3 Gy) based on the targets used in the re-irradiation treatment. Results: In all cases, where the cumulative dose exceeded 100 or 90 Gy, these high dose volumes were larger for the proton plans. The integral doses were significantly higher in all photon plans (reduction with protons: 48.6%, p < 0.01). In two cases (22.2%), organ at risk (OAR) sparing was superior with the proton plan. In one case (11.1%), the photon plan showed a dosimetric advantage. In the remaining six cases (66.7%), we found no clinically relevant differences in dose to the OARs. Conclusions: The dosimetric results of the accumulated dose for a re-irradiation with protons and with photons were very similar. The photon plans had a steeper dose falloff directly outside the target and were superior in minimizing the high dose volumes. The proton plans achieved a lower integral dose. Clinically relevant OAR sparing was extremely case specific. The optimal treatment modality should be assessed individually. Advances in knowledge: Dose sparing in re-irradiation of intracranial meningiomas with protons or photons is highly case specific and the optimal treatment modality needs to be assessed on an individual basis.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyong Lin ◽  
Minglei Kang ◽  
Timothy D. Solberg ◽  
Thierry Mertens ◽  
Christian Baumer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document