Single-breath oxygen dilution for the measurement of total lung capacity: technical description and preliminary results in healthy subjects

Author(s):  
Giovanni Vinetti ◽  
Giovanni Ferrarini ◽  
Anna Taboni ◽  
Michele Guerini ◽  
Claudio Tantucci ◽  
...  
1980 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 946-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Bradley ◽  
N. R. Anthonisen

The effects of a variety of restrictive procedures on lung mechanics were studied in eight healthy subjects. Rib cage restriction decreased total lung capacity (TLC) by 43% and significantly increased elastic recoil and maximum expiratory flow (MEF). Subsequent immersion of four subjects with rib cage restriction resulted in no further change in either parameter; shifts of blood volume did not reverse recoil changes during rib cage restriction. Abdominal restriction decreased TLC by 40% and increased MEF and elastic recoil, but recoil was increased significantly less than was the case with rib cage restriction. Further, at a given recoil pressure, MEF was less during rib cage restriction than during either abdominal restriction or no restriction. Measurements of the unevenness of inspired gas distribution by the single-breath nitrogen technique showed increased unevenness during rib cage restriction, which was significantly greater than that during abdominal restriction. We conclude that lung volume restriction induces changes in lung function, but the nature of these changes depends on how the restriction is applied and therefore cannot be ascribed to low lung volume breathing per se.


1984 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. S. Hurst ◽  
B. L. Graham ◽  
D. J. Cotton

We studied 10 symptom-free lifetime non-smokers and 17 smokers all with normal pulmonary function studies. All subjects performed single-breath N2 washout tests by either exhaling slowly (“slow maneuver”) from end inspiration (EI) to residual volume (RV) or exhaling maximally (“fast maneuver”) from EI to RV. After either maneuver, subjects then slowly inhaled 100% O2 to total lung capacity (TLC) and without breath holding, exhaled slowly back to RV. In the nonsmokers seated upright phase III slope of single-breath N2 test (delta N2/l) was lower (P less than 0.01) for the fast vs. the slow maneuver, but this difference disappeared when the subjects repeated the maneuvers in the supine position. In contrast, delta N2/l was higher for the fast vs. the slow maneuver (P less than 0.01) in smokers seated upright. For the slow maneuver, delta N2/l was similar between smokers and nonsmokers but for the fast maneuvers delta N2/l was higher in smokers than nonsmokers (P less than 0.01). We suggest that the fast exhalation to RV decreases delta N2/l in normal subjects by decreasing apex-to-base differences in regional ratio of RV to TLC (RV/TLC) but increases delta N2/l in smokers, because regional RV/TLC increases distal to sites of small airways obstruction when the expiratory flow rate is increased.


1998 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 2146-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer Sinderby ◽  
Jennifer Beck ◽  
Jadranka Spahija ◽  
Jan Weinberg ◽  
Alex Grassino

Intersubject comparison of the crural diaphragm electromyogram, as measured by an esophageal electrode, requires a reliable means for normalizing the signal. The present study set out 1) to evaluate which voluntary respiratory maneuvers provide high and reproducible diaphragm electromyogram root-mean-square (RMS) values and 2) to determine the relative diaphragm activation and mechanical and ventilatory outputs during breathing at rest in healthy subjects ( n = 5), in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 5), and in restrictive patients with prior polio infection (PPI, n = 6). In all groups, mean voluntary maximal RMS values were higher during inspiration to total lung capacity than during sniff inhalation through the nose ( P = 0.035, ANOVA). The RMS (percentage of voluntary maximal RMS) during quiet breathing was 8% in healthy subjects, 43% in COPD patients, and 45% in PPI patients. Despite the large difference in relative RMS ( P = 0.012), there were no differences in mean transdiaphragmatic pressure ( P= 0.977) and tidal volumes ( P = 0.426). We conclude that voluntary maximal RMS is reliably obtained during an inspiration to total lung capacity but a sniff inhalation could be a useful complementary maneuver. Severe COPD and PPI patients breathing at rest are characterized by increased diaphragm activation with no change in diaphragm pressure generation.


2001 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 506-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Jensen ◽  
Haytham Atileh ◽  
Bela Suki ◽  
Edward P. Ingenito ◽  
Kenneth R. Lutchen

In 9 healthy and 14 asthmatic subjects before and after a standard bronchial challenge and a modified [deep inspiration (DI), inhibited] bronchial challenge and after albuterol, we tracked airway caliber by synthesizing a method to measure airway resistance (Raw; i.e., lung resistance at 8 Hz) in real time. We determined the minimum Raw achievable during a DI to total lung capacity and the subsequent dynamics of Raw after exhalation and resumption of tidal breathing. Results showed that even after a bronchial challenge healthy subjects can dilate airways maximally, and the dilation caused by a single DI takes several breaths to return to baseline. In contrast, at baseline, asthmatic subjects cannot maximally dilate their airways, and this worsens considerably postconstriction. Moreover, after a DI, the dilation that does occur in airway caliber in asthmatic subjects constricts back to baseline much faster (often after a single breath). After albuterol, asthmatic subjects could dilate airways much closer to levels of those of healthy subjects. These data suggest that the asthmatic smooth muscle resides in a stiffer biological state compared with the stimulated healthy smooth muscle, and inhibiting a DI in healthy subjects cannot mimic this.


Respirology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene R. PESOLA ◽  
Robert T. MAGARI ◽  
Samuel DARTEY-HAYFORD ◽  
Vinette COELHO-D'COSTA ◽  
Vernon M. CHINCHILLI

1998 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Beck ◽  
Christer Sinderby ◽  
Lars Lindström ◽  
Alex Grassino

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of velocity of shortening on the relationship between diaphragm activation and pressure generation in humans. This was achieved by relating the root mean square (RMS) of the diaphragm electromyogram to the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) generated during dynamic contractions at different inspiratory flow rates. Five healthy subjects inspired from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity at different flow rates while reproducing identical Pdi and chest wall configuration profiles. To change the inspiratory flow rate, subjects performed the inspirations while breathing across two different inspiratory resistances (10 and 100 cmH2O ⋅ l−1 ⋅ s), at mouth pressure targets of −10, −20, −40, and −60 cmH2O. The diaphragm electromyogram was recorded and analyzed with control of signal contamination and electrode positioning. RMS values obtained for inspirations with identical Pdi and chest wall configuration profiles were compared at the same percentage of inspiratory duration. At inspiratory flows ranging between 0.1 and 1.4 l/s, there was no difference in the RMS for the inspirations from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity when Pdi and chest wall configuration profiles were reproduced ( n = 4). At higher inspiratory flow rates, subjects were not able to reproduce their chest wall displacements and adopted different recruitment patterns. In conclusion, there was no evidence for increased demand of diaphragm activation when healthy subjects breathe with similar chest wall configuration and Pdi profiles, at increasing flow rates up to 1.4 l/s.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 123S
Author(s):  
Gene R. Pesola ◽  
Robert T. Magari ◽  
Samuel Dartey ◽  
Vinette Coelho-D'Costa ◽  
Gladstone Huggins

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 659-667
Author(s):  
Ricardo Marques Dias ◽  
Fernando Hauaji Chacur ◽  
Sonia Regina da Silva Carvalho ◽  
André Luís Mancini ◽  
Geraldo A. Capuchino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document