scholarly journals Experimental tests of Quantum Mechanics: from Pauli Exclusion Principle Violation to spontaneous collapse models

2012 ◽  
Vol 361 ◽  
pp. 012006 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Curceanu (Petrascu) ◽  
S Bartalucci ◽  
A Bassi ◽  
S Bertolucci ◽  
M Bragadireanu ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalina Curceanu ◽  
S. Bartalucci ◽  
A. Bassi ◽  
S. Bertolucci ◽  
M. Bragadireanu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 631 ◽  
pp. 012068 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Curceanu ◽  
S Bartalucci ◽  
A Bassi ◽  
S Bertolucci ◽  
C Berucci ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 40-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Curceanu (Petrascu) ◽  
S. Bartalucci ◽  
S. Bertolucci ◽  
M. Bragadireanu ◽  
M. Cargnelli ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 09 (supp01) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. CURCEANU (PETRASCU) ◽  
S. BARTALUCCI ◽  
M. BRAGADIREANU ◽  
C. GUARALDO ◽  
M. ILIESCU ◽  
...  

The Pauli exclusion principle (PEP) is one of the basic principles of modern physics. Being at the very basis of our understanding of matter, as many other fundamental principles it spurs, presently, a lively debate on its possible limits, deeply rooted in the very foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Therefore, it is extremely important to test the limits of its validity. Quon theory provides a suitable mathematical framework of possible violation of PEP, where the violation parameter q translates into a probability of violating PEP. Experimentally, setting a bound on PEP violation means confining the violation parameter to a value very close to either 1 (for bosons) or -1 (for fermions). The VIP (VIolation of the Pauli exclusion principle) experiment established a limit on the probability that PEP is violated by electrons, using the method of searching for PEP forbidden atomic transitions in copper. We describe the experimental method, the obtained results, both in terms of the q-parameter from quon theory and as probability of PEP violation, we briefly discuss them and present future plans to go beyond the actual limit by upgrading the experimental technique using vetoed new spectroscopical fast Silicon Drift Detectors. We also shortly mention the possibility of using a similar experimental technique to search for eventual X-rays, generated in the spontaneous collapse models.


2011 ◽  
Vol 306 ◽  
pp. 012036 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Curceanu Petrascu ◽  
S Bartalucci ◽  
S Bertolucci ◽  
M Bragadireanu ◽  
M Cargnelli ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 07 (27) ◽  
pp. 6691-6762 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVE K. LAMOREAUX

A review of the experimental tests of quantum mechanics is presented. Tests of the wave-particle duality of matter for atoms, electrons, and neutrons are discussed. Also covered are applications of neutron interferometry to a variety of quantum mechanics tests. Tests of the topological nature of quantum mechanics (Aharonov-Bohm effect, Aharonov-Casher effect, Berry’s phase, Aharonov-Anandan phase) are reviewed. Other topics reviewed include the experimental tests of the Bell inequality, nonlinear additions to the Schrödinger equation, the Pauli exclusion principle, the Zeno effect, and the uniqueness of ħ.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Milotti ◽  
S. Bartalucci ◽  
S. Bertolucci ◽  
M. Bragadireanu ◽  
M. Cargnelli ◽  
...  

The Pauli Exclusion Principle is a basic principle of Quantum Mechanics, and its validity has never been seriously challenged. However, given its fundamental standing, it is very important to check it as thoroughly as possible. Here we describe the VIP (VIolation of the Pauli exclusion principle) experiment, an improved version of the Ramberg and Snow experiment (E. Ramberg and G. Snow, Phys. Lett. B238, 438 (1990)); VIP has just completed the installation at the Gran Sasso underground laboratory, and aims to test the Pauli Exclusion Principle for electrons with unprecedented accuracy, down to β2/2 ≈ 10-30 - 10-31. We report preliminary experimental results and briefly discuss some of the implications of a possible violation.


Author(s):  
Eric Scerri

In chapter 7, the influence of the old quantum theory on the periodic system was considered. Although the development of this theory provided a way of reexpressing the periodic table in terms of the number of outer-shell electrons, it did not yield anything essentially new to the understanding of chemistry. Indeed, in several cases, chemists such as Irving Langmuir, J.D. Main Smith, and Charles Bury were able to go further than physicists in assigning electronic configurations, as described in chapter 8, because they were more familiar with the chemical properties of individual elements. Moreover, despite the rhetoric in favor of quantum mechanics that was propagated by Niels Bohr and others, the discovery that hafnium was a transition metal and not a rare earth was not made deductively from the quantum theory. It was essentially a chemical fact that was accommodated in terms of the quantum mechanical understanding of the periodic table. The old quantum theory was quantitatively impotent in the context of the periodic table since it was not possible to even set up the necessary equations to begin to obtain solutions for the atoms with more than one electron. An explanation could be given for the periodic table in terms of numbers of electrons in the outer shells of atoms, but generally only after the fact. But when it came to trying to predict quantitative aspects of atoms, such as the ground-state energy of the helium atom, the old quantum theory was quite hopeless. As one physicist stated, “We should not be surprised . . . even the astronomers have not yet satisfactorily solved the three-body problem in spite of efforts over the centuries.” A succession of the best minds in physics, including Hendrik Kramers, Werner Heisenberg, and Arnold Sommerfeld, made strenuous attempts to calculate the spectrum of helium but to no avail. It was only following the introduction of the Pauli exclusion principle and the development of the new quantum mechanics that Heisenberg succeeded where everyone else had failed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document