scholarly journals The Effect of Membrane Modification Using TiO2, ZnO, and GO Nanoparticles: Challenges and Future Direction in Wastewater Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 1053 (1) ◽  
pp. 012135
Author(s):  
TD Kusworo ◽  
R E Nugraheni ◽  
N Aryanti
2012 ◽  
Vol 610-613 ◽  
pp. 1556-1559
Author(s):  
Zhen Min Chen ◽  
Wei Xie ◽  
Hai Ying Zhang

Wastewater is an inevitable by-product in human production and life. And with development of human society and enhancing of urbanization level and citizens living standards, wastewater quantity will sharply increase. Greenhouse gas (GHG) from wastewater treatment will drastically do, too. In especial CO2, its emission quantity is most, its greenhouse effect is highest among GHG from wastewater treatment. But current wastewater treatment engineering does not relate to GHG in the design and operation process. In the case of global climate change, obviously the problem of CO2emission from wastewater treatment has to be solved. And because of this the paper sum up China and other country's research results, current status, and future direction.


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 1431-1432 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Shao ◽  
L.F. Liu ◽  
F.L. Yang ◽  
D.N. Shan ◽  
H. Yuan

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 888
Author(s):  
Mingliang Chen ◽  
Sebastiaan G. J. Heijman ◽  
Luuk C. Rietveld

Membrane filtration is considered to be one of the most promising methods for oily wastewater treatment. Because of their hydrophilic surface, ceramic membranes show less fouling compared with their polymeric counterparts. Membrane fouling, however, is an inevitable phenomenon in the filtration process, leading to higher energy consumption and a shorter lifetime of the membrane. It is therefore important to improve the fouling resistance of the ceramic membranes in oily wastewater treatment. In this review, we first focus on the various methods used for ceramic membrane modification, aiming for application in oily wastewater. Then, the performance of the modified ceramic membranes is discussed and compared. We found that, besides the traditional sol-gel and dip-coating methods, atomic layer deposition is promising for ceramic membrane modification in terms of the control of layer thickness, and pore size tuning. Enhanced surface hydrophilicity and surface charge are two of the most used strategies to improve the performance of ceramic membranes for oily wastewater treatment. Nano-sized metal oxides such as TiO2, ZrO2 and Fe2O3 and graphene oxide are considered to be the potential candidates for ceramic membrane modification for flux enhancement and fouling alleviation. The passive antifouling ceramic membranes, e.g., photocatalytic and electrified ceramic membranes, have shown some potential in fouling control, oil rejection and flux enhancement, but have their limitations.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Hareb Al-Jabri ◽  
Probir Das ◽  
Shoyeb Khan ◽  
Mahmoud Thaher ◽  
Mohammed AbdulQuadir

The treatment of different types of wastewater by physicochemical or biological (non-microalgal) methods could often be either inefficient or energy-intensive. Microalgae are ubiquitous microscopic organisms, which thrive in water bodies that contain the necessary nutrients. Wastewaters are typically contaminated with nitrogen, phosphorus, and other trace elements, which microalgae require for their cell growth. In addition, most of the microalgae are photosynthetic in nature, and these organisms do not require an organic source for their proliferation, although some strains could utilize organics both in the presence and absence of light. Therefore, microalgal bioremediation could be integrated with existing treatment methods or adopted as the single biological method for efficiently treating wastewater. This review paper summarized the mechanisms of pollutants removal by microalgae, microalgal bioremediation potential of different types of wastewaters, the potential application of wastewater-grown microalgal biomass, existing challenges, and the future direction of microalgal application in wastewater treatment.


1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 341-342
Author(s):  
STEPHEN T. MARGULIS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document