scholarly journals Human augmentation by wearable supernumerary robotic limbs: review and perspectives

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 042005
Author(s):  
Domenico Prattichizzo ◽  
Maria Pozzi ◽  
Tommaso Lisini Baldi ◽  
Monica Malvezzi ◽  
Irfan Hussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Edwin G. Johnsen ◽  
William R. Corliss
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Michael Szollosy

This chapter introduces the “Perspectives” section of the Handbook of Living Machines offering an overview of the different contributions gathered here that consider how biomimetic and biohybrid systems will transform our personal lives and social organizations, and how we might respond to the challenges that these transformations will inevitably pose to our ‘posthuman’ worlds. The authors in this section see it as essential that those who aspire to create living machines engage with the public to confront misconceptions, deep anxieties, and unrealistic aspirations that presently dominate the cultural imagination, and to include potential users in questions of design and utility as new technologies are being developed. Human augmentation and enhancement are other important themes addressed, raising important questions about what it means fundamentally to be ‘human’. These questions and challenges are addressed through the lens of the social and personal impacts of new technologies on human selves, the public imagination, ethics, and human relationships.


Author(s):  
Ryoichi Ando ◽  
Isao Uebayashi ◽  
Hayato Sato ◽  
Hayato Ohbayashi ◽  
Shota Katagiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 25 (3.4) ◽  
pp. 306-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Doherty ◽  
W. G. Pope
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Shafti ◽  
Shlomi Haar ◽  
Renato Mio Zaldivar ◽  
Pierre Guilleminot ◽  
A. Aldo Faisal

AbstractWe wanted to study the ability of our brains and bodies to be augmented by supernumerary robot limbs, here extra fingers. We developed a mechanically highly functional supernumerary robotic 3rd thumb actuator, the SR3T, and interfaced it with human users enabling them to play the piano with 11 fingers. We devised a set of measurement protocols and behavioural “biomarkers”, the Human Augmentation Motor Coordination Assessment (HAMCA), which allowed us a priori to predict how well each individual human user could, after training, play the piano with a two-thumbs-hand. To evaluate augmented music playing ability we devised a simple musical score, as well as metrics for assessing the accuracy of playing the score. We evaluated the SR3T (supernumerary robotic 3rd thumb) on 12 human subjects including 6 naïve and 6 experienced piano players. We demonstrated that humans can learn to play the piano with a 6-fingered hand within one hour of training. For each subject we could predict individually, based solely on their HAMCA performance before training, how well they were able to perform with the extra robotic thumb, after training (training end-point performance). Our work demonstrates the feasibility of robotic human augmentation with supernumerary robotic limbs within short time scales. We show how linking the neuroscience of motor learning with dexterous robotics and human-robot interfacing can be used to inform a priori how far individual motor impaired patients or healthy manual workers could benefit from robotic augmentation solutions.


Author(s):  
Haibei Zhu ◽  
Mahmoud Elfar ◽  
Miroslav Pajic ◽  
Ziyao Wang ◽  
Mary L. Cummings

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 5750
Author(s):  
Alberto Ranavolo ◽  
Arash Ajoudani ◽  
Andrea Cherubini ◽  
Matteo Bianchi ◽  
Lars Fritzsche ◽  
...  

Due to the epochal changes introduced by “Industry 4.0”, it is getting harder to apply the varying approaches for biomechanical risk assessment of manual handling tasks used to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMDs) considered within the International Standards for ergonomics. In fact, the innovative human–robot collaboration (HRC) systems are widening the number of work motor tasks that cannot be assessed. On the other hand, new sensor-based tools for biomechanical risk assessment could be used for both quantitative “direct instrumental evaluations” and “rating of standard methods”, allowing certain improvements over traditional methods. In this light, this Letter aims at detecting the need for revising the standards for human ergonomics and biomechanical risk assessment by analyzing the WMDs prevalence and incidence; additionally, the strengths and weaknesses of traditional methods listed within the International Standards for manual handling activities and the next challenges needed for their revision are considered. As a representative example, the discussion is referred to the lifting of heavy loads where the revision should include the use of sensor-based tools for biomechanical risk assessment during lifting performed with the use of exoskeletons, by more than one person (team lifting) and when the traditional methods cannot be applied. The wearability of sensing and feedback sensors in addition to human augmentation technologies allows for increasing workers’ awareness about possible risks and enhance the effectiveness and safety during the execution of in many manual handling activities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Valeriani ◽  
Caterina Cinel ◽  
Riccardo Poli

The field of brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) has grown rapidly in the last few decades, allowing the development of ever faster and more reliable assistive technologies for converting brain activity into control signals for external devices for people with severe disabilities [...]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document