Evaluation of Methods of Breast or Bottle Feeding on Length of Hospitalization of Preterm Infants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Wener ◽  
Kimberly E. Dow ◽  
Sandra Fucile
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita H. Pickler ◽  
Barbara A. Reyna ◽  
Paul A. Wetzel ◽  
Mary Lewis

Background. The purpose of this study of preterm infants was to test the effect of four approaches to the time of transition from gavage to full oral feedings, time to discharge, and weight gain during the transition.Methods. A randomized experimental design was used with four intervention groups: early start (32 weeks’ postmenstrual age)/slow progressing experience (gradually increasing oral feedings offered per day); early start/maximum experience (oral feedings offered at every feeding opportunity); late start (34 weeks’ postmenstrual age)/slow progressing experience; and late start/maximum experience.Results. The analysis included 86 preterm infants. Once oral feedings were initiated, infants in the late start/maximum experience group achieved full oral feeding and were discharged to home significantly sooner than infants in either early start group. Although not significantly different, these infants also achieved these outcomes sooner than infants in the late start/slow progressing experience group. There were no differences in weight gain across groups.Conclusions. Results suggest starting oral feedings later in preterm infants may result in more rapid transition to full oral feedings and discharge although not at early postnatal ages. Provision of a more consistent approach to oral feeding may support infant neurodevelopment and reduce length of hospitalization.


2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Esterlita T. Villanueva-Uy ◽  
Michael Q. Van Haute ◽  
Erena S. Kasahara ◽  
Socorro De Leon-Mendoza

Background. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is a low-cost but high-impact intervention for preterm and low birth weight (LBW) infants. Objectives. To determine the effect of KMC on in-hospital mortality among preterm and LBW infants, taking into consideration their gestational age, birth weight, income category of the country of birth, and medical stability. Materials and Methods. A comprehensive search of several databases, as well as local listings of research papers, was performed to look for randomized controlled studies with KMC as intervention, and mortality and length of hospitalization as outcome measures. The risk of bias and publication bias was assessed. We did subgroup analyses based on income category of the country of birth, gestational age, birth weight, and medical stability of the infants. Results. Sixteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1738 infants in the KMC group and 1674 infants in the control group were included. Based on the GRADE approach, although all the studies were RCTs, the evidence is assessed as moderate certainty due to the nature of the intervention (KMC) that prevented blinding. There was a 41% reduction in risk of dying among preterm and low birth weight infants who received KMC compared to conventional medical care (3.86%% vs 6.87%; RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.44, 0.79; I2 = 0%; number needed to treat for additional benefit (NNTB) = 34; 16 RCTs; 3,412 infants). Furthermore, there were also reductions in the risk of dying among infants who were <34 weeks AOG (KMC: 4.32% vs CMC: 8.17%, RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38, 0.79; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 26; 10 RCTs; 1795 infants), with birthweight of >1500 g (KMC: 3.97% vs CMC: 6.83%, RR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.45, 0.82; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 35; 10 RCTs; 2960 infants), and born in low- and middle income countries (LMIC) (3.77% vs 6.95%; RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.43, 0.77; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 32; 14 RCTs; 3281 infants). There was a significant reduction in mortality (KMC: 11.05% vs CMC: 20.94%; RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.34, 0.87; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 11; 5 RCTs; 387 infants) even among medically unstable infants who received KMC compared to those who did not. The length of hospitalization did not significantly differ between the KMC and the control groups. Due to high heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed, which showed a trend towards a shorter length of hospital stay among preterm infants <34 weeks AOG, with birthweight ≥1500 g, medically unstable during admission, and belonging to LMIC but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion. There was moderate certainty evidence that KMC can decrease mortality among preterm and LBW infants. Furthermore, KMC was beneficial among relatively more premature, bigger, medically unstable preterm infants and born in low to middle-income countries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2333794X2095268
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. Hill ◽  
Jinhee Park ◽  
Britt F. Pados

Preterm infants frequently experience oral feeding challenges while in the neonatal intensive care unit, with research focusing on infant feeding during this hospital stay. There is little data on symptoms of problematic feeding in preterm-born infants in the months after discharge. The purpose of this study was to describe symptoms of problematic bottle-feeding in the first 7 months of life in infants born preterm, compared to full-term infants. Parents of infants less than 7 months old completed an online survey that included the Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool—Bottle-feeding and questions about the infant’s medical and feeding history. General linear models were used to evaluate differences in NeoEAT—Bottle-feeding total score and subscale scores by preterm category, considering other significant factors. Very preterm infants had more symptoms of problematic bottle-feeding than other infants. Current age, presence of gastroesophageal reflux, and anomalies of the face/mouth were associated with problematic bottle-feeding.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine C. Meyer ◽  
Cynthia T. Garcia Coll ◽  
Barry M. Lester ◽  
C. F. Zachariah Boukydis ◽  
Susan M. McDonough ◽  
...  

Objective. To determine the efficacy of an individualized, family-based intervention with preterm infants and their families. Design. Randomized, repeated measures intervention outcome study. Setting. Level III neonatal intensive care nursery. Patients. Random sample of 34 preterm infants ≤1500 g and their families. Interventions. Individualized, family-based intervention during the hospitalization and transition to home addressed problems identified by parents in four domains including: infant behavior and characteristics, family organization and functioning, caregiving environment, and home discharge and community resources. Measurements and Main Results. Standardized questionnaires were administered at baseline and discharge to mothers, and predischarge bottle-feeding interactions were videotaped and coded by two blinded observers. Results were in favor of intervention (Int) versus control (Con) mothers (baseline; discharge) (P &lt; .05) on the Parental Stressor Scale Sights and Sounds subscale (Int 2.4 ± 1.0; 2.0 ± 0.8 vs Con 2.4 ± 0.9; 2.6 ± 0.8); Child's Appearance and Behavior subscale (Int 2.8 ± 1.0; 2.5 ± 1.1 vs Con 2.8 ± 0.8; 3.1 ± 0.6); and Total Stressor Score (Int 93.9 ± 36.6; 72.3 ± 41.8 vs Con 87.5 ± 26.7; 87.8 ± 26.2). On the Beck Depression Inventory, intervention mothers had significant decreases in depressive symptoms (39%; 11%) vs control mothers (31%; 44%). Maternal self-esteem in both groups improved over time. There were no significant group differences in family environment. During feeding interactions, intervention infants grimaced (P &lt; .001) and gagged (P &lt; .05) less than controls. Intervention mothers less frequently interrupted feedings (P &lt; .001); less frequently stimulated infant sucking (P &lt; .01); smiled more (P &lt; .001); vocalized more (P &lt; .01); demonstrated greater sensitivity to infant behavior (P &lt; .001), better quality of physical contact (P &lt; .001), and more positive affect (P &lt; .01). Conclusions. Individualized, family-based intervention appears to reduce maternal stress and depression, and to enhance early mother-infant feeding interactions. Further research is needed to determine whether these short-term beneficial effects persist beyond the newborn period.


2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amel M Abouelfettoh ◽  
Donna A Dowling ◽  
Soheir A Dabash ◽  
Shadia R Elguindy ◽  
Iman A Seoud

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document