scholarly journals Geographic Disparities in Mortality Risk Within a Racially Diverse Sample of U.S. Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury

Health Equity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 304-312
Author(s):  
Clara E. Dismuke-Greer ◽  
Mulugeta Gebregziabher ◽  
Tiarney Ritchwood ◽  
Mary Jo Pugh ◽  
Rebekah J. Walker ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 686
Author(s):  
Dorji Harnod ◽  
Tomor Harnod ◽  
Cheng-Li Lin ◽  
Chia-Hung Kao

We used the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan to determine whether patients with posttraumatic dementia (PTD) exhibit increased mortality and medical burden than those without it. Patients ≥20 years of age having head injury admission (per the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 850–854, 959.01) between 2000 and 2012 were enrolled as traumatic brain injury (TBI) cohort. A PTD cohort (with ICD-9-CM codes 290, 294.1, 331.0) and a posttraumatic nondementia (PTN) cohort were established and compared in terms of age, sex, and comorbidities. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause mortality risk, number of hospital days, and frequency of medical visits in these cohorts. Patients with PTD had a higher mortality rate than did patients with TBI alone (rate per 1000 person-years: 12.00 vs. 6.32), with an aHR of 1.54 (95% CI: 1.32–1.80). Patients with PTD who were aged ≥65 years (aHR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.31–1.80) or male (aHR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.45–2.18) exhibited greatly increased risks of mortality. Furthermore, patients with PTD had 19.9 more hospital days and required medical visits 4.49 times more frequently compared with the PTN cohort. Taiwanese patients with PTD had increased mortality risk and medical burden compared with patients who had TBI only. Our findings provide crucial information for clinicians and the government to improve TBI and PTD outcomes.


Author(s):  
Maximilian Peter Forssten ◽  
Gary Alan Bass ◽  
Kai-Michael Scheufler ◽  
Ahmad Mohammad Ismail ◽  
Yang Cao ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. As cardiovascular events are among the most common extracranial causes of death after a severe TBI, the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) could potentially aid in the risk stratification of this patient population. This investigation aimed to determine the association between the RCRI and in-hospital deaths among isolated severe TBI patients. Methods All adult patients registered in the TQIP database between 2013 and 2017 who suffered an isolated severe TBI, defined as a head AIS ≥ 3 with an AIS ≤ 1 in all other body regions, were included. Patients were excluded if they had a head AIS of 6. The association between different RCRI scores (0, 1, 2, 3, ≥ 4) and in-hospital mortality was analyzed using a Poisson regression model with robust standard errors while adjusting for potential confounders, with RCRI 0 as the reference. Results 259,399 patients met the study’s inclusion criteria. RCRI 2 was associated with a 6% increase in mortality risk [adjusted IRR (95% CI) 1.06 (1.01–1.12), p = 0.027], RCRI 3 was associated with a 17% increased risk of mortality [adjusted IRR (95% CI) 1.17 (1.05–1.31), p = 0.004], and RCRI ≥ 4 was associated with a 46% increased risk of in-hospital mortality [adjusted IRR(95% CI) 1.46 (1.11–1.90), p = 0.006], compared to RCRI 0. Conclusion An elevated RCRI ≥ 2 is significantly associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality among patients with an isolated severe traumatic brain injury. The simplicity and bedside applicability of the index makes it an attractive choice for risk stratification in this patient population.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuan-Chi Tu ◽  
Che-Chuan Che-Chuan Wang ◽  
Nai-Ching Chen ◽  
Kuo-Tai Chen ◽  
Chia-Jung Chen ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a critical public health challenge. Although studies have found several prognostic factors for TBI, a useful early predictive model for mortality has yet to be developed for TBI patients in the emergency room. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to use artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms to develop predictive models for TBI patients in the emergency room triage. This could provide scientific data for healthcare providers which they could use as a reference when deciding which treatment to give and when informing and educating patient’s family members. METHODS From January 2010 to December 2019, this study retrospectively enrolled 18,249 TBI patients (9908 males and 8341 females; mean age: 57.85 ± 19.44 years) in the electronic medical records of three Chi-Mei Medical Centers, and investigated the 12 potentially predictive feature variables. Mortality during hospitalization was designated as the outcome variable. The correlation coefficient matrix was used to analyze the feature variables and mortality using Spearman rank order correlation methods. Further, the present study constructed six machine learning models including logistic regression (LR) random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), Light GBM, XGBoost and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to predict mortality risk. Next, following the model training and building, we conducted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for six models performance evaluation. Finally, we deployed and installed the model in the hospital information system for clinical practice in the triage setting. RESULTS The results showed that all six predictive models had high AUC from 0.851 to 0.925. Among these predictive models, LR-based model was the best model for mortality risk prediction with sensitivity of 0.812, specificity of 0.894, and accuracy of 0.89 for the 12 feature variables; thus, this was used to develop an application to assist in clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS These results revealed that the LR model was the best model to predict the mortality risk in patients with TBI in the emergency room. Since the developed AI system can easily obtain the 12 feature variables during the initial triage, it can provide quick outcome prediction to clinicians to help them explain the patient’s condition to family members and to guide them in deciding further treatment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 883-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. D. Andrews ◽  
Aryelly Rodriguez ◽  
Peter Suter ◽  
Claire G. Battison ◽  
Jonathan K. J. Rhodes ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. 734-734
Author(s):  
Dorji Harnod ◽  
Yu-Shu Yen ◽  
Cheng-Li Lin ◽  
Tomor Harnod ◽  
Chia-Hung Kao

2013 ◽  
Vol 217 (3) ◽  
pp. S108
Author(s):  
Ashley D. Meagher ◽  
Jennifer Doorey ◽  
Christopher Beadles ◽  
Anthony G. Charles

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document