scholarly journals Early Palliative Care Services and End-of-Life Care in Medicare Beneficiaries with Hematologic Malignancies: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay B. Rao ◽  
Emmanuelle Belanger ◽  
Pamela C. Egan ◽  
Thomas W. LeBlanc ◽  
Adam J. Olszewski
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Thomas William LeBlanc ◽  
Jonathan David O'Donnell ◽  
Megan Crowley-Makota ◽  
Daniel Paul Dohan ◽  
Michael W. Rabow ◽  
...  

9 Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies have unmet palliative care needs but are less likely to receive specialist palliative care services than patients with solid tumors. This difference is poorly understood. Methods: Multisite, mixed-methods study to understand and contrast perceptions of palliative care among hematologic oncologists and solid tumor oncologists. Between February and October 2012, oncologists at 3 academic medical centers with well-established palliative care services completed surveys assessing referral practices and in-depth, semi-structured interviews about their views of palliative care. We compared referral patterns using standard statistical methods. We then analyzed qualitative interview data using constant comparative methods to explore reasons for observed differences. Results: Among 66 interviewees, 23 oncologists cared exclusively for patients with hematologic malignancies, and 43 treated only patients with solid tumors. Seven of 23 hematologic oncologists (30%) reported never referring a patient to palliative care; all solid tumor oncologists had previously referred (p<0.001). In qualitative analyses, most hematologic oncologists viewed palliative care as end-of-life care, while most solid tumor oncologists viewed palliative care as a subspecialty that could assist with complex cases and/or offload burden in a busy clinic. Solid tumor oncologists emphasized practical barriers to palliative care referral, such as appointment availability and reimbursement issues. Hematologic oncologists emphasized philosophical concerns about palliative care referrals, including different treatment goals, responsiveness to chemotherapy, and a preference to control palliative aspects of patient care. Conclusions: Most hematologic oncologists view palliative care as end-of-life care, while solid tumor oncologists more often view palliative care as a subspecialty for co-managing complex patients. Efforts to integrate palliative care into hematologic malignancy practices will require solutions that address unique barriers to palliative care referral experienced by hematologic oncologists.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 384-384
Author(s):  
Vinay B Rao ◽  
Emmanuelle Belanger ◽  
Pamela C Egan ◽  
Thomas W. LeBlanc ◽  
Adam J Olszewski

Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies often receive aggressive care at the end of life (EOL), leading to lower quality of life. Access to early palliative care may improve EOL care outcomes, its benefits are less well established in hematologic malignancies than in solid tumors. We sought to describe the use of palliative care services among Medicare beneficiaries with hematologic malignancies, and associated EOL quality measures. Methods: Using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare registry, we studied fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with acute or chronic leukemias, lymphomas, myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasms, who died in 2001-2015. We described trends in the use of billed palliative care services (BPCS, identified by codes in clinician encounter claims: ICD-9 V66.7 or ICD-10 Z51.5). Among patients surviving &gt;30 days from diagnosis, we compared baseline characteristics and EOL care quality metrics for patients with and without "early" BPCS (defined as services initiated &gt;30 days before death), as well as Medicare spending in the last 30 days of life. Multivariable models were fitted as appropriate according to outcome variable (robust Poisson, negative binomial, or log-gamma) and adjusting for hematologic malignancy histology, patients' age, sex, race, marital status, Medicaid co-insurance, comorbidity index and performance status indicator (calculated from claims within 1 year before death), and year of death. Results: Among the 139,191 decedents, median age at death was 82 years and 46.4% were women. The proportion with any BPCS was 5.2% overall during the study period, and it increased from 0.4% in 2001 to 13.3% in 2015 (Fig. A). Median time from the first BPCS encounter to death was 10 days (interquartile range, 3 to 39), and it increased from 6 days in 2001 to 12 days in 2015. Most (84.3%) BPCS encounters occurred during hospital admissions (Fig. B), and this proportion did not significantly change over time. Although the number of BPCS claims increased over time for any specialty, there was a relative increase in claims billed by nurse practitioners (from 7.9% in 2001/05, to 29.7% in 2011/15) or palliative care specialists (from 0% to 15.6%, respectively). Use of early BPCS remained rare, but increased from 0.2% in 2001 to 4.3% in 2015. Overall, early BPCS constituted 28.5% of all first BPCS. A relatively higher proportion of early BPCS occurred in the ambulatory setting (15.0%). In the comparative cohort of patients who survived &gt;30 days from diagnosis (N=120,741, Table), the use of early BPCS (1.7% overall) was more frequent in acute leukemia than in other histologies, adjusting for other factors. It was also significantly more frequent among Black patients, those with higher comorbidity indices or poor performance statuses, and those who received active chemotherapy at any point. Presence of early BPCS was associated with significantly improved EOL care quality metrics, including higher rates of hospice use, longer hospice length of stay, and lower use of aggressive measures, like repeated hospitalizations, admissions to the intensive care unit, and receipt of chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life (see Table). Early BPCS were also associated with significantly lower average Medicare spending in the last 30 days of life (marginal means $21,380 with and $23,651 without early BPCS, P&lt;.001). Conclusion: Use of BPCS among Medicare beneficiaries with hematologic malignancies has increased steeply in recent years, but most encounters still occur within days of death in the inpatient setting. This pattern potentially limits the benefits that could be achieved for patients and their caregivers with earlier institution of palliative care. Early BPCS are associated with better EOL care quality metrics similar to those observed in solid tumors, but causation remains uncertain in retrospective claims data, especially given known underutilization of palliative care billing codes in non-terminal patients. Our results support the need for prospective trials of early palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies, and for research about the barriers to early access to palliative care that may be specific to this patient population. Disclosures LeBlanc: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Heron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CareVive: Consultancy; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medtronic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; American Cancer Society: Research Funding; Duke University: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; NINR/NIH: Research Funding; Flatiron: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Olszewski:Genentech: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1334-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine RL Brown ◽  
Amy T Hsu ◽  
Claire Kendall ◽  
Denise Marshall ◽  
Jose Pereira ◽  
...  

Background: To enable coordinated palliative care delivery, all clinicians should have basic palliative care skill sets (‘generalist palliative care’). Specialists should have skills for managing complex and difficult cases (‘specialist palliative care’) and co-exist to support generalists through consultation care and transfer of care. Little information exists about the actual mixes of generalist and specialist palliative care. Aim: To describe the models of physician-based palliative care services delivered to patients in the last 12 months of life. Design: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health care administrative data. Setting/participants: Physicians providing palliative care services to a decedent cohort in Ontario, Canada. The decedent cohort consisted of all adults (18+ years) who died in Ontario, Canada between April 2011 and March 2015 ( n = 361,951). Results: We describe four major models of palliative care services: (1) 53.0% of decedents received no physician-based palliative care, (2) 21.2% received only generalist palliative care, (3) 14.7% received consultation palliative care (i.e. care from both specialists and generalists), and (4) 11.1% received only specialist palliative care. Among physicians providing palliative care ( n = 11,006), 95.3% had a generalist palliative care focus and 4.7% a specialist focus; 74.2% were trained as family physicians. Conclusion: We examined how often a coordinated palliative care model is delivered to a large decedent cohort and identified that few actually received consultation care. The majority of care, in both the palliative care generalist and specialist models, was delivered by family physicians. Further research should evaluate how different models of care impact patient outcomes and costs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1231-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilson I. Gonsalves ◽  
Tsewang Tashi ◽  
Jairam Krishnamurthy ◽  
Tracy Davies ◽  
Stephanie Ortman ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Gagnon ◽  
Lyne Nadeau ◽  
Susan Scott ◽  
Serge Dumont ◽  
Neil MacDonald ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROSAMOND RHODES ◽  
JAMES J. STRAIN

Abstract:Palliative care has had a long-standing commitment to teaching medical students and other medical professionals about pain management, communication, supporting patients in their decisions, and providing compassionate end-of-life care. Palliative care programs also have a critical role in helping patients understand medical conditions, and in supporting them in dealing with pain, fear of dying, and the experiences of the terminal phase of their lives. We applaud their efforts to provide that critical training and fully support their continued important work in meeting the needs of patients and families. Although we appreciate the contributions of palliative care services, we have noted a problem involving some palliative care professionals’ attitudes, methods of decisionmaking, and use of language. In this article we explain these problems by discussing two cases that we encountered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S668-S668
Author(s):  
Tess H Moeke-Maxwell ◽  
Kathleen R Mason ◽  
Merryn Gott

Abstract Older indigenous people and their families draw on specific tribal care customs to support end-of-life care as these help to fortify and strengthen older people. New Zealand’s health and palliative care services can either help or hinder families to utilise their care customs. The aim of the Pae Herenga study was to investigate the specific traditional care customs employed by older New Zealand Māori. This involved 60 face-to-face interviews with participants who had a life limiting illness (majority aged over 65), family carers, indigenous healers, spiritual practitioners, and health and palliative care professionals across four key geographical sites. Three digital story workshops involving 16 participants were also included. The study findings show that no matter what the older person’s illness was, their cultural customs and protocols helped to fortify them and kept them spiritually safe at end-of-life. Hospitals and hospices helped families to action their customs by providing rooms large enough to host gatherings of thirty or more people; prayers, songs, speechmaking and communal sharing of food took place. However, incidences of racism, a lack of space, and a lack of support for indigenous plant medicines prevented the use of ancient traditional end-of-life care customs for older people. The findings suggest that health and palliative care services can help older indigenous people maintain their spiritual strength by providing them with culturally supportive care and environments equipped to host the dying and their families.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document