In the Absence of a Mechanical Bowel Prep, Does the Addition of Pre-Operative Oral Antibiotics to Parental Antibiotics Decrease the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection after Elective Segmental Colectomy?

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Atkinson ◽  
Brian R. Swenson ◽  
Dennis J. Hanseman ◽  
Emily F. Midura ◽  
Bradley R. Davis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-1056-S-1057
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Atkinson ◽  
Bradley R. Davis ◽  
Janice F. Rafferty ◽  
Martha Ferguson ◽  
Ian M. Paquette


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. e183226 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. T. Toh ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Kerry Hitos ◽  
Nimalan Pathma-Nathan ◽  
Toufic El-Khoury ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Norman Hadi ◽  
Hantoro Ishardyanto

Surgical operations on modified radical mastectomy are considered clean procedures by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) wound classification system. Despite this, higher than expected Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rates are reported, varying from 1 % to 26 % across the literature. Some surgeons also prescribe postoperative prophylaxis for postoperative modified radical mastectomy patients to prevent infection despite its lack of proven efficacy. The aim of this study is to analyze the use of oral antibiotics to prevent Surgical Site Infection (SSI) on postoperative modified radical mastectomy patients in Dr. Soetomo General Hospital. This study was double-blinded randomized control trial of 60 postoperative modified radical mastectomy patients (2 groups) during the period of December 2017 to March 2018. Samples were prospectively divided into two groups (random sampling), in group A (n=30) patients received single dose prophylactic antibiotics and continued with oral antibiotics postoperative (Cefadroxil 2 x 500 mg) during 7 days and in group B (n=30) patients received single dose prophylactic antibiotics and continued without postoperative antibiotics (placebo). Both groups were evaluated clinically for surgical site infection up to 30 days. There was no statistically significant difference in both groups {p=1 (p>0.05)}. There was no incidence of surgical site infection in both groups during the 30-day follow-up period (days 3, 7, 14 and 30). There was no difference in the surgical site infection rate among those who received oral postoperative antibiotics prophylactic and without antibiotics (placebo) on postoperative modified radical mastectomy patients in Dr. Soetomo General Hospital. Because of the potential adverse events associated with antibiotic use, further evaluation of this practice is required.



2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Bikram Prasad Shrestha ◽  
Surya Raj Niraula ◽  
Parvin Nepal ◽  
Guru Prasad Khanal ◽  
Navin Karn ◽  
...  

Introduction: In our country, various institutes have different protocols for postoperative antibiotics. Many western literature have mentioned that administration of prophylactic antibiotics for longer than 24 hours has no advantage and may actually lead to superinfection with drug-resistant organisms. Because of environmental and theater condition most of the surgeon here are very reluctant to use prophylactic antibiotics for only 24 hours. The objective of the study was to find out the effect of duration of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of surgical site infection in clean elective orthopaedic surgeries. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial involving 207 clean elective orthopaedic patients undergoing surgery. The patients were divided into three groups which received intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for 24 hours, 48 hours and 48 hours followed by 7 days of oral antibiotics respectively. The patients were followed up for three months postoperatively. Result: There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection among the three groups. Conclusion: We conclude that there is no benefit in prolonging prophylactic antibiotics beyond 24 hours. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/noaj.v3i1.9318   Nepal Orthopedic Association Journal 2013 Vol.3(1): 5-10





BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e057226
Author(s):  
Juliane Friedrichs ◽  
Svenja Seide ◽  
Johannes Vey ◽  
Samuel Zimmermann ◽  
Julia Hardt ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the relative contribution of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis, mechanical bowel preparation, oral antibiotic prophylaxis, and combinations thereof towards the reduction of surgical site infection (SSI) incidence in elective colorectal resections.Methods and analysisA systematic search of randomised controlled trials comparing interventions to reduce SSI incidence will be conducted with predefined search terms in the following databases: MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Additionally, several online databases will be searched for ongoing trials, and conference proceedings and reference lists of retrieved articles will be hand searched. The title–abstract screening will be partly performed by means of a semiautomated supervised machine learning approach, which will be trained on a subset of the identified titles and abstracts identified through traditional screening methods.The primary analysis will be a multicomponent network meta-analysis, as we expect to identify studies that investigate combinations of interventions (eg, mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics) as well as studies that focus on individual components (mechanical bowel preparation or oral antibiotics). By means of a multicomponent network meta-analysis, we aim at estimating the effects of the separate components along the effects of the observed combinations. To account for between-trial heterogeneity, a random-effect approach will be combined with inverse variance weighting for estimation of the treatment effects. Associated 95% CIs will be calculated as well as the ranking for each component in the network using P scores. Results will be visualised by network graphics and forest plots of the overall pairwise effect estimates. Comparison-adjusted funnel plots will be used to assess publication bias.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval by the Ethical Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg (ID of approval: 2021–148). Results shall be disseminated directly to decision-makers (eg, surgeons, gastroenterologists, wound care specialists) by means of publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentation at conferences and through the media (eg, radio, TV, etc).PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021267322.



2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-81
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Shelygin ◽  
M. A. Nagudov ◽  
A. A. Ponomarenko ◽  
E. G. Rybakov ◽  
M. A. Suhina

AIM: to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative oral antibiotics in reduction of surgical site infection (SSI) in rectal surgery. METHODS: patients undergoing rectal resection were assigned randomly to 2 groups: control (standard preoperative care and intravenous injection of 3d generation cephalosporin) and oral antibiotics group (the above was complemented by three-knit oral metronidazole 500 mg and erythromycin 500 mg after beginning of mechanical bowel cleansing at 5.00, 8.00 and 10.00 p.m.). The primary endpoint was the overall rate of SSI. RESULTS: between November 2017 and October 2018, 104 patients (48 in the oral antibiotics group and 56 in control group) were enrolled for this study. The incidence of SSIs was 19.6% (11/56) in control group and 4.1% (2/48) in the oral antibiotics group(р=0.01). Both groups had no statistically significant differences in intensity of SSIs and rate of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: preoperative oral antibiotic significantly reduced the risk of SSIs following rectal surgery. The study needs to be continued for evaluation of preoperative oral antibiotics impact to intensity of SSIs and rate of anastomotic leakage.



2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Duff ◽  
C. L. F. Battersby ◽  
R. J. Davies ◽  
L. Hancock ◽  
J. Pipe ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document