Contemporary Insertion of Central Venous Access Catheters in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Record Review Study of 538 Catheters in a Single Center

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max B. van Gent ◽  
Wendeline J. van der Made ◽  
Perla J. Marang-van de Mheen ◽  
Koen E. van der Bogt
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Wiegering ◽  
Sophie Schmid ◽  
Oliver Andres ◽  
Clemens Wirth ◽  
Armin Wiegering ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Baskin ◽  
Christopher Hunnicutt ◽  
Megan E. Beck ◽  
Elan D. Cohen ◽  
John J. Crowley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Shane ◽  
Zahra Premji

Evidence from 2 clinical studies showed that there was no difference in the rates of infection and complications between peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion at the bedside and insertion in Interventional Radiology (IR) suites. However, each of these studies focused on small subgroups of the larger pediatric population and had other methodological limitations. Evidence from 1 clinical study in a single quaternary, non-cardiac, pediatric intensive care unit suggested that the median time from PICC line order to successful insertion was longer for lines placed in the IR compared to at the bedside. Two guidelines were identified that recommend ultrasound guidance for insertion of central venous access devices (CVAD), including PICCs: 1 was aimed at all pediatric patients and 1 was aimed at onco-hematological pediatric patients who had numerous quality limitations.


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Fusaro ◽  
M.G. Scarpa ◽  
R. Lo Piccolo ◽  
G.F. Zanon

Occlusion of traditional sites for central venous cannulation is a challenging problem in patients that require a permanent central venous line for chronic administration of nutrients or drugs. In rare cases, extensive central venous thrombosis of the superior and inferior vena cava may preclude catheterization, and uncommon routes should be used. We describe our approach for placement of chronic central venous lines in two pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome and extensive caval occlusion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 866-871
Author(s):  
Brian M. Cummings ◽  
Neil D. Fernandes ◽  
Lois F. Parker ◽  
Sarah A. Murphy ◽  
Phoebe H. Yager

Background: Standardized volume dosing of 23.4% hypertonic saline (HTS) exists for adults, but the concentration, dosing and administration of HTS in pediatrics is variable. With emerging pediatric experience of 23.4% HTS, a standard volume dose approach may be helpful. Objective: To describe initial experience with a standardized 23.4% HTS weight-based volume dosing protocol of 10, 20, or 30 mL in the pediatric intensive care unit. Methods: Standard volume doses of 23.4% HTS were developed from weight dosing equivalents of 3% HTS. Pre and post sodium and intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements were compared with paired t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The site of administration and complications were noted. Results: A total of 16 pediatric patients received 37 doses of 23.4% HTS, with the smallest patient weighing 11 kg. For protocol compliance, 17 doses (46%) followed recommended dosing, 19 were less volume than recommended (51%), and 1 dose (3%) was more than recommended. Mean increase in sodium was 3.5 mEq/L (95% CI = 2-5 mEq/L); P < 0.0001. The median decrease in ICP was 10.5 mm Hg (interquartile range [IQR] 8.3-19.5) for a 37% (IQR 25%-64%) reduction. Most doses were administered through central venous access, although peripheral intravenous administrations occurred in 4 patients without complication. Conclusion and Relevance: Three standard-volume dose options of 23.4% HTS based on weight increases sodium and reduces ICP in pediatric patients. Standard-volume doses may simplify weight-based dosing, storage and administration for pediatric emergencies, although the optimum dose, and safety of 23.4% HTS in children remains unknown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document