Development and Validation of an Instrument in Spanish to Evaluate Patient Satisfaction in Telemedicine Consultation During COVID-19 Pandemic

Author(s):  
Jeziel Isaí Tovar-Martínez ◽  
Maria Elena Romero-Ibarguengoitia ◽  
Claudia Elvira Torres-Almaguer
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Moon ◽  
Claire Kolar ◽  
Amanda Brummel ◽  
Molly Ekstrand ◽  
Haley Holtan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Serhal ◽  
Anne Kirvan ◽  
Marcos Sanches ◽  
Allison Crawford

BACKGROUND Telepsychiatry is an increasingly used model of mental health care that connects patients with psychiatrists at a distance via videoconference. Telepsychiatry is an effective clinical intervention that improves access to quality care in regions with limited resources or in clinical situations where in-person care is unavailable. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop a validated survey tool to measure patient experience and satisfaction with telepsychiatry based on the quality of care domains. This study also seeks to understand which health service outcomes were most strongly correlated with overall satisfaction in the context of telepsychiatry. METHODS The survey created in this study was developed and validated with a panel of subject matter and process experts and was piloted with 274 patients who received clinical consultations through the TeleMental Health Program at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Factor analysis was used to determine correlations between questions and quality of care domains and was also used to assess model fit. RESULTS The study provides a validated survey to measure patient satisfaction and experience with telepsychiatry across 4 domains: access and timeliness, appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety. Both safety and access and timeliness were found to be statistically significant predictors of satisfaction in our sample. CONCLUSIONS By situating patient satisfaction and experience within this framework, the survey facilitates patient data collection and interpretation through a clinical quality lens.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S62-S62
Author(s):  
Charles B Foster ◽  
Martinez Kathryn ◽  
Camille Sabella ◽  
Gregory Weaver ◽  
Michael Rothberg

Abstract Background Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a common reason for direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine consultation. Antibiotic prescribing during video-only DTC telemedicine consults was explored for pediatric RTIs, focusing on correlates with visit duration and patient satisfaction. Methods Data on pediatric (age less than 19 years) RTI consults were obtained from a large DTC nationwide telemedicine platform and included patient, physician, and encounter characteristics. Mixed-effects regression was used to assess variation in antibiotic receipt by patient and physician factors, as well as the association between antibiotic receipt and visit length or patient satisfaction. Results Of 12,842 RTI visits with 560 physicians, 55% of patients received an antibiotic prescription. Antibiotic prescribing rates among telemedicine providers were high: sinusitis (92.1%), otitis media (96.0%), pharyngitis (76.7%), and bronchitis/bronchiolitis (62.0%). A provider was more likely to receive a 5-star satisfaction rating from the parent when the child was provided a prescription for an antibiotic (OR 3.38; 95% CI 2.84–4.02), an antiviral (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.81–3.64) or a nonantibiotic (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.58–2.36). Visit length (mean 6.4 minute) was associated with higher satisfaction only when no antibiotic was prescribed (OR 1.03 per 6 seconds; 95% CI 1.01–1.06). Compared with nonpediatricians, pediatric providers were less likely to prescribe antibiotics (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29–0.68); however, patients of pediatricians were more likely to be highly satisfied (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.11–2.03). Conclusion During DTC telemedicine video consultations for RTIs, pediatric patients were frequently prescribed antibiotics, which correlated with visit satisfaction. Although pediatricians prescribed antibiotics at a lower rate than other physicians, their satisfaction scores were higher. Especially problematic, adherence to guideline-concordant criteria for diagnosing acute otitis media and streptococcal pharyngitis, which, respectively, require otoscopy and throat culture, is not possible during a video-only telemedicine consult. High rates of antibiotic prescribing to children with RTIs suggest a need for antimicrobial stewardship efforts during video-only telemedicine consultation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.


1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Itzhak ◽  
T Weinberger ◽  
E Berkovitch ◽  
S Reis

Aprimary-care teleconsulting system was established between an academic family medicine centre and a clinic about 50 km away. The video conferencing units were connected at 384 kbit/s. Seven patients were examined by a physician in the clinic and then examined by a consulting physician using the telemedicine system. Four other patients were examined through the telemedicine system first and by a local physician later. The telemedicine consultation solved five of the patients’ medical problems. The waiting period before receiving expert medical consultation was reduced. There was full patient satisfaction regarding this method of consultation, patient ‘run around’ was avoided and patients felt at ease. The telemedicine consultation process improved the patient-physician bond and the attending physician's level of confidence.


2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerea González ◽  
Jose M. Quintana ◽  
Amaia Bilbao ◽  
Antonio Escobar ◽  
Felipe Aizpuru ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 452-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah F. Barnett ◽  
Ravi K. Alagar ◽  
Michael P. W. Grocott ◽  
Savvas Giannaris ◽  
John R. Dick ◽  
...  

Abstract Patient satisfaction is an important measure of the quality of health care and is used as an outcome measure in interventional and quality improvement studies. Previous studies have found that there are few appropriately developed and validated questionnaires available. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify all tools used to measure patient satisfaction with anesthesia, which have undergone a psychometric development and validation process, appraised the quality of these processes, and made recommendations of tools that may be suitable for use in different clinical and academic settings. There are a number of robustly developed and subsequently validated instruments, however, there are still many studies using nonvalidated instruments or poorly developed tools, claiming to accurately assess satisfaction with anesthesia. This can lead to biased and inaccurate results. Researchers in this field should be encouraged to use available validated tools, to ensure that patient satisfaction is measured and reported fairly and accurately.


Maturitas ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline S.M. Lai ◽  
S.S. Chua ◽  
S.P. Chan ◽  
W.Y. Low ◽  
Ian C.K. Wong

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. AB145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Revicki ◽  
John J. Vargo ◽  
Kellee Howard ◽  
Jennifer Petrillo ◽  
John Mcrorie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document