scholarly journals Fourier frames for singular measures and pure type phenomena

2018 ◽  
Vol 146 (7) ◽  
pp. 2883-2896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nir Lev

2018 ◽  
Vol 274 (9) ◽  
pp. 2477-2498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoye Fu ◽  
Chun-Kit Lai


2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1289-1341 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALAN BARTLETT

In this paper, we generalize and develop results of Queffélec allowing us to characterize the spectrum of an aperiodic$\mathbb{Z}^{d}$substitution. Specifically, we describe the Fourier coefficients of mutually singular measures of pure type giving rise to the maximal spectral type of the translation operator on$L^{2}$, without any assumptions on primitivity or height, and show singularity for aperiodic bijective commutative$\mathbb{Z}^{d}$substitutions. Moreover, we provide a simple algorithm to determine the spectrum of aperiodic$\mathbf{q}$-substitutions, and use this to show singularity of Queffélec’s non-commutative bijective substitution, as well as the Table tiling, answering an open question of Solomyak. Finally, we show that every ergodic matrix of measures on a compact metric space can be diagonalized, which we use in the proof of the main result.



2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-85
Author(s):  
Cletus Famous Nwankwo

AbstractThis paper examines the effect of rurality on party system fragmentation in the Nigerian presidential elections of the fourth republic. The findings show that party system fragmentation (PSF) has been characteristically low in the Nigerian presidential elections and rurality does not significantly predict party system fragmentation. Rurality has a negative effect on PSF in all the elections studied except the 2003 election but only significant in the 2011 poll. Thus, the paper cast doubt on previous studies that indicate that striking rural-urban differences manifest in party system fragmentation in African elections and attribute it to previous studies’ measure of rurality. The paper argues that the use of a composite measure of rurality instead of singular measures of rurality might provide better analysis that helps us understand the effect of rurality on party systems. Also, it argues that in the study of the rural-urban difference in voting behaviour or political behaviours more broadly, data should be aggregated based on cities and non-city areas because cities have distinctive urban characters compared with non-city places. Analyses done on states or constituencies level may not reveal the rural-urban difference because states and constituencies usually have a mix of rural and urban population and other characteristics.



1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Weifeng Su ◽  
Xingwei Zhou


2003 ◽  
Vol 85 (7) ◽  
pp. 30-49
Author(s):  
Fairouz Kamareddine ◽  
Twan Laan ◽  
Rob Nederpelt


1973 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1194-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Wada ◽  
Yoshio Tamura


Author(s):  
Edwin Hewitt ◽  
Herbert S. Zuckerman

Introduction. A famous construction of Wiener and Wintner ((13)), later refined by Salem ((11)) and extended by Schaeffer ((12)) and Ivašev-Musatov ((8)), produces a non-negative, singular, continuous measure μ on [ − π,π[ such thatfor every ∈ > 0. It is plain that the convolution μ * μ is absolutely continuous and in fact has Lebesgue–Radon–Nikodým derivative f such that For general locally compact Abelian groups, no exact analogue of (1 · 1) seems possible, as the character group may admit no natural order. However, it makes good sense to ask if μ* μ is absolutely continuous and has pth power integrable derivative. We will construct continuous singular measures μ on all non-discrete locally compact Abelian groups G such that μ * μ is a absolutely continuous and for which the Lebesgue–Radon–Nikodým derivative of μ * μ is in, for all real p > 1.







2001 ◽  
Vol 269 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 317-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Barthe ◽  
John Hatcliff ◽  
Morten Heine Sørensen


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document