scholarly journals RanGTP Targets p97 to RanBP2, a Filamentous Protein Localized at the Cytoplasmic Periphery of the Nuclear Pore Complex

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2379-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Delphin ◽  
Tinglu Guan ◽  
Frauke Melchior ◽  
Larry Gerace
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Pore Complex ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Localization Signal ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal Receptor

RanBP2, a protein containing FG repeat motifs and four binding sites for the guanosine triphosphatase Ran, is localized at the cytoplasmic periphery of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and is believed to play a critical role in nuclear protein import. We purified RanBP2 from rat liver nuclear envelopes and examined its structural and biochemical properties. Electron microscopy showed that RanBP2 forms a flexible filamentous molecule with a length of ∼36 nm, suggesting that it comprises a major portion of the cytoplasmic fibrils implicated in initial binding of import substrates to the NPC. Using in vitro assays, we characterized the ability of RanBP2 to bind p97, a cytosolic factor implicated in the association of the nuclear localization signal receptor with the NPC. We found that RanGTP promotes the binding of p97 to RanBP2, whereas it inhibits the binding of p97 to other FG repeat nucleoporins. These data suggest that RanGTP acts to specifically target p97 to RanBP2, where p97 may support the binding of an nuclear localization signal receptor/substrate complex to RanBP2 in an early step of nuclear import.

scholarly journals Nuclear Localization Signal and Protein Context both Mediate Importin α Specificity of Nuclear Import Substrates

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 8697-8709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Friedrich ◽  
Christina Quensel ◽  
Thomas Sommer ◽  
Enno Hartmann ◽  
Matthias Köhler
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Importin Α ◽  
Localization Signal ◽  
Experimental Approaches

ABSTRACT The “classical” nuclear protein import pathway depends on importin α and importin β. Importin α binds nuclear localization signal (NLS)-bearing proteins and functions as an adapter to access the importin β-dependent import pathway. In humans, only one importin β is known to interact with importin α, while six α importins have been described. Various experimental approaches provided evidence that several substrates are transported specifically by particular α importins. Whether the NLS is sufficient to mediate importin α specificity is unclear. To address this question, we exchanged the NLSs of two well-characterized import substrates, the seven-bladed propeller protein RCC1, preferentially transported into the nucleus by importin α3, and the less specifically imported substrate nucleoplasmin. In vitro binding studies and nuclear import assays revealed that both NLS and protein context contribute to the specificity of importin α binding and transport.

scholarly journals Karyopherins regulate nuclear pore complex barrier and transport function

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (11) ◽  
pp. 3609-3624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larisa E. Kapinos ◽  
Binlu Huang ◽  
Chantal Rencurel ◽  
Roderick Y.H. Lim
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Pore Complex ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Nucleocytoplasmic Transport ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Transport Function ◽  
Guanosine Triphosphate ◽  
Localization Signal

Nucleocytoplasmic transport is sustained by karyopherins (Kaps) and a Ran guanosine triphosphate (RanGTP) gradient that imports nuclear localization signal (NLS)–specific cargoes (NLS-cargoes) into the nucleus. However, how nuclear pore complex (NPC) barrier selectivity, Kap traffic, and NLS-cargo release are systematically linked and simultaneously regulated remains incoherent. In this study, we show that Kapα facilitates Kapβ1 turnover and occupancy at the NPC in a RanGTP-dependent manner that is directly coupled to NLS-cargo release and NPC barrier function. This is underpinned by the binding affinity of Kapβ1 to phenylalanine–glycine nucleoporins (FG Nups), which is comparable with RanGTP·Kapβ1, but stronger for Kapα·Kapβ1. On this basis, RanGTP is ineffective at releasing standalone Kapβ1 from NPCs. Depleting Kapα·Kapβ1 by RanGTP further abrogates NPC barrier function, whereas adding back Kapβ1 rescues it while Kapβ1 turnover softens it. Therefore, the FG Nups are necessary but insufficient for NPC barrier function. We conclude that Kaps constitute integral constituents of the NPC whose barrier, transport, and cargo release functionalities establish a continuum under a mechanism of Kap-centric control.

scholarly journals A Nuclear Export Signal in Kap95p Is Required for Both Recycling the Import Factor and Interaction with the Nucleoporin GLFG Repeat Regions of Nup116p and Nup100p

1997 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 797-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kathryn Iovine ◽  
Susan R. Wente
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Nuclear Export Signal ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Localization Signal ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal Receptor ◽  
Export Signal

During nuclear import, cytosolic transport factors move through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) to the nuclear compartment. Kap95p is required during import for docking the nuclear localization signal-receptor and ligand to the NPC. Recycling of this factor back to the cytoplasm is necessary for continued rounds of import; however, the mechanism for Kap95p recycling is unknown. We have determined that recycling of Kap95p requires a nuclear export signal (NES). A region containing the NES in Kap95p was sufficient to mediate active nuclear export in a microinjection assay. Moreover, the NES was necessary for function. Mutation of the NES in Kap95p resulted in a temperaturesensitive import mutant, and immunofluorescence microscopy experiments showed that the mutated Kap95p was not recycled but instead localized in the nucleus and at the nuclear envelope. Srp1p, the yeast nuclear localization signal-receptor, also accumulated in the nuclei of the arrested kap95 mutant cells. Wild-type and NES-mutated Kap95p both bound Gsp1p (the yeast Ran/TC4 homologue), Srp1p, and the FXFG repeat region of the nucleoporin Nup1p. In contrast, the NES mutation abolished Kap95p interaction with the GLFG repeat regions from the nucleoporins Nup116p and Nup100p. In vivo interaction was demonstrated by isolation of Kap95p from yeast nuclear lysates in either protein A–tagged Nup116p or protein A–tagged Nup100p complexes. The protein A–tagged Nup116p complex also specifically contained Gle2p. These results support a model in which a step in the recycling of Kap95p is mediated by interaction of an NES with GLFG regions. Analysis of genetic interactions suggests Nup116p has a primary role in Kap95p recycling, with Nup100p compensating in the absence of Nup116p. This finding highlights an important role for a subfamily of GLFG nucleoporins in nuclear export processes.

scholarly journals Dynamic localization of the nuclear import receptor and its interactions with transport factors.

1996 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 1163-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Koepp ◽  
D H Wong ◽  
A H Corbett ◽  
P A Silver
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Genetic Interaction ◽  
Nuclear Transport ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Importin Beta ◽  
Importin Alpha ◽  
Localization Signal

Characterization of the interactions between soluble factors required for nuclear transport is key to understanding the process of nuclear trafficking. Using a synthetic lethal screen with the rna1-1 strain, we have identified a genetic interaction between Rna1p, a GTPase activating protein required for nuclear transport, and yeast importin-beta, a component of the nuclear localization signal receptor. By the use of fusion proteins, we demonstrate that Rna1p physically interacts with importin-beta. Mutants in importin-beta exhibit in vivo nuclear protein import defects, and importin-beta localizes to the nuclear envelope along with other proteins associated with the nuclear pore complex. In addition, we present evidence that importin-alpha, but not importin-beta, mislocalizes to the nucleus in cells where the GTPase Ran is likely to be in the GDP-bound state. We suggest a model of nuclear transport in which Ran-mediated hydrolysis of GTP is necessary for the import of importin-alpha and the nuclear localization signal-bearing substrate into the nucleus, while exchange of GDP for GTP on Ran is required for the export of both mRNA and importin-alpha from the nucleus.

scholarly journals Specific Nucleoporin Requirement for Smad Nuclear Translocation

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (16) ◽  
pp. 4022-4034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochu Chen ◽  
Lan Xu
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Pore Complex ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Nuclear Periphery ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor Β ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Localization Signal

ABSTRACT Cytoplasm-to-nucleus translocation of Smad is a fundamental step in transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signal transduction. Here we identify a subset of nucleoporins that, in conjunction with Msk (Drosophila Imp7/8), specifically mediate activation-induced nuclear translocation of MAD (Drosophila Smad1) but not the constitutive import of proteins harboring a classic nuclear localization signal (cNLS) or the spontaneous nuclear import of Medea (Drosophila Smad4). Surprisingly, many of these nucleoporins, including Sec13, Nup75, Nup93, and Nup205, are scaffold nucleoporins considered important for the overall integrity of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) but not known to have cargo-specific functions. We demonstrate that the roles of these nucleoporins in supporting Smad nuclear import are separate from their previously assigned functions in NPC assembly. Furthermore, we uncovered novel pathway-specific functions of Sec13 and Nup93; both Sec13 and Nup93 are able to preferentially interact with the phosphorylated/activated form of MAD, and Nup93 acts to recruit the importin Msk to the nuclear periphery. These findings, together with the observation that Sec13 and Nup93 could interact directly with Msk, suggest their direct involvement in the nuclear import of MAD. Thus, we have delineated the nucleoporin requirement of MAD nuclear import, reflecting a unique trans-NPC mechanism.

Phosphorylation of Srp1p, the yeast nuclear localization signal receptor, in vitro and in vivo

Biochimie ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 247-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Azuma ◽  
K. Takio ◽  
M.M. Tabb ◽  
L. Vu ◽  
M. Nomura
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Localization Signal ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal Receptor

scholarly journals SUMO-1 Modification and Its Role in Targeting the Ran GTPase-activating Protein, RanGAP1, to the Nuclear Pore Complex

1998 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Matunis ◽  
Jian Wu ◽  
Günter Blobel
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Nuclear Export Signal ◽  
Nucleocytoplasmic Transport ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Nuclear Pore Complexes ◽  
Gtpase Activating Protein ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Localization Signal

RanGAP1 is the GTPase-activating protein for Ran, a small ras-like GTPase involved in regulating nucleocytoplasmic transport. In vertebrates, RanGAP1 is present in two forms: one that is cytoplasmic, and another that is concentrated at the cytoplasmic fibers of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). The NPC-associated form of RanGAP1 is covalently modified by the small ubiquitin-like protein, SUMO-1, and we have recently proposed that SUMO-1 modification functions to target RanGAP1 to the NPC. Here, we identify the domain of RanGAP1 that specifies SUMO-1 modification and demonstrate that mutations in this domain that inhibit modification also inhibit targeting to the NPC. Targeting of a heterologous protein to the NPC depended on determinants specifying SUMO-1 modification and also on additional determinants in the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1. SUMO-1 modification and these additional determinants were found to specify interaction between the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1 and a region of the nucleoporin, Nup358, between Ran-binding domains three and four. Together, these findings indicate that SUMO-1 modification targets RanGAP1 to the NPC by exposing, or creating, a Nup358 binding site in the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1. Surprisingly, the COOH-terminal domain of RanGAP1 was also found to harbor a nuclear localization signal. This nuclear localization signal, and the presence of nine leucine-rich nuclear export signal motifs, suggests that RanGAP1 may shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.

Nuclear import of glycoconjugates is distinct from the classical NLS pathway

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 1325-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Duverger ◽  
C. Pellerin-Mendes ◽  
R. Mayer ◽  
A.C. Roche ◽  
M. Monsigny
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Peptide Sequence ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Permeabilized Cells ◽  
Localization Signal ◽  
Energy Dependent ◽  
Cytosolic Factors

The nuclear import of many proteins depends on a short peptide sequence called the nuclear localization signal. However, glycosylated proteins, which lack such a nuclear localization signal, upon their injection into the cytosol by electroporation, enter the nucleus in a sugar-dependent manner. This paper brings new insights on the mechanism of this process, based on a study of neoglycoprotein nuclear uptake by digitonin-permeabilized cells. The nuclear import of neoglycoproteins is energy dependent: it does not occur when cells are maintained at 4 degrees C or when cells are ATP-depleted by treatment with apyrase. The nuclear import of neoglycoproteins occurs through the nuclear pore: it is inhibited by preincubation of cells with wheat germ agglutinin, a lectin which binds the nuclear pore glycoproteins and blocks the translocation step of nuclear localization signal bearing proteins through the nuclear pore. Furthermore, the nuclear import of neoglycoproteins does not use the pathway of nuclear localization signal bearing proteins: nuclear import of nuclear localization signal bearing proteins depends on cytosolic factors and is inhibited by treatment of cells with N-ethylmaleimide, while the nuclear import of neoglycoproteins neither requires added cytosolic factors nor is sensitive to alkylation by N-ethylmaleimide. In addition, upon incubation in the presence of a large excess of nuclear localization signal bearing protein, the nuclear import of neoglycoproteins is not inhibited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document