scholarly journals Securin and Separase Phosphorylation Act Redundantly to Maintain Sister Chromatid Cohesion in Mammalian Cells

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 4725-4732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxu Huang ◽  
Rashieda Hatcher ◽  
J. Philippe York ◽  
Pumin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

The spindle assembly checkpoint monitors the integrity of the spindle microtubules, which attach to sister chromatids at kinetochores and play a vital role in preserving genome stability by preventing missegregation. A key target of the spindle assembly checkpoint is securin, the separase inhibitor. In budding yeast, loss of securin results in precocious sister chromatid separation when the microtubule spindle is disrupted. However, in contrast to budding yeast, mammalian securin is not required for spindle checkpoint, suggesting that there are redundant mechanisms controlling the dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion in the absence of securin. One candidate mechanism is the inhibitory phosphorylation of separase. We generated a nonphosphorylable point mutant (S1121A) separase allele in securin-/- mouse embryonic stem cells. Securin-/-separase+/S1121A cells are viable but fail to maintain sister chromatid cohesion in response to the disruption of spindle microtubules, show enhanced sensitivity to nocodazole, and cannot recover from prometaphase arrest.

scholarly journals Absence of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint restores mitotic fidelity upon loss of sister chromatid cohesion

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui D. Silva ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Leonardo G. Guilgur ◽  
Om S. Rathore ◽  
Rui Gonçalo Martinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Survival ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genome Shuffling ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Abnormal Development ◽  
Wing Development ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractSister chromatid cohesion is essential for faithful mitosis, as premature cohesion loss leads to random chromosome segregation and aneuploidy, resulting in abnormal development. To identify specific conditions capable of restoring defects associated with cohesion loss, we screened for genes whose depletion modulates Drosophila wing development when sister chromatid cohesion is impaired. Cohesion deficiency was induced by knock-down of the acetyltransferase Separation anxiety (San)/Naa50, a cohesin complex stabilizer. Several genes whose function impacts wing development upon cohesion loss were identified. Surprisingly, knockdown of key Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) proteins, Mad2 and Mps1, suppressed developmental defects associated with San depletion. SAC impairment upon cohesin removal, triggered by San depletion or artificial removal of the cohesin complex, prevented extensive genome shuffling, reduced segregation defects and restored cell survival. This counterintuitive phenotypic suppression was caused by an intrinsic bias for efficient chromosome bi-orientation at mitotic entry, coupled with slow engagement of error-correction reactions. We conclude that mitotic timing determines the severity of defects associated with cohesion deficiency. Therefore, although divisions are still error-prone, SAC inactivation enhances cell survival and tissue homeostasis upon cohesion loss.

scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 Are Required for Sister Chromatid Cohesion

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 3144-3158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Hanna ◽  
Evgueny S. Kroll ◽  
Victoria Lundblad ◽  
Forrest A. Spencer
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Core Components ◽  
Proliferating Cell

ABSTRACT CTF4 and CTF18 are required for high-fidelity chromosome segregation. Both exhibit genetic and physical ties to replication fork constituents. We find that absence of eitherCTF4 or CTF18 causes sister chromatid cohesion failure and leads to a preanaphase accumulation of cells that depends on the spindle assembly checkpoint. The physical and genetic interactions between CTF4, CTF18, and core components of replication fork complexes observed in this study and others suggest that both gene products act in association with the replication fork to facilitate sister chromatid cohesion. We find that Ctf18p, anRFC1-like protein, directly interacts with Rfc2p, Rfc3p, Rfc4p, and Rfc5p. However, Ctf18p is not a component of biochemically purified proliferating cell nuclear antigen loading RF-C, suggesting the presence of a discrete complex containing Ctf18p, Rfc2p, Rfc3p, Rfc4p, and Rfc5p. Recent identification and characterization of the budding yeast polymerase κ, encoded by TRF4, strongly supports a hypothesis that the DNA replication machinery is required for proper sister chromatid cohesion. Analogous to the polymerase switching role of the bacterial and human RF-C complexes, we propose that budding yeast RF-CCTF18 may be involved in a polymerase switch event that facilities sister chromatid cohesion. The requirement for CTF4 and CTF18 in robust cohesion identifies novel roles for replication accessory proteins in this process.

scholarly journals Absence of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Restores Mitotic Fidelity upon Loss of Sister Chromatid Cohesion

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 2837-2844.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui D. Silva ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Leonardo G. Guilgur ◽  
Om S. Rathore ◽  
Rui Gonçalo Martinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Fission yeast Pds5 is required for accurate chromosome segregation and for survival after DNA damage or metaphase arrest

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Win Wang ◽  
Rebecca L. Read ◽  
Chris J. Norbury
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion, which is established during the S phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle and persists until the onset of anaphase, is essential for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Cohesion requires the multi-protein complex cohesin, as well as a number of accessory proteins including Pds5/BIMD/Spo76. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds5 is an essential protein that localises to chromosomes in a cohesin-dependent manner. Here we describe the characterisation in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe of pds5+, a novel,non-essential orthologue of S. cerevisiae PDS5. The S. pombePds5 protein was localised to punctate nuclear foci in a manner that was dependent on the Rad21 cohesin component. This, together with additional genetic evidence, points towards an involvement of S. pombe Pds5 in sister chromatid cohesion. S. pombe pds5 mutants were hypersensitive to DNA damage and to mitotic metaphase delay, but this sensitivity was apparently not due to precocious loss of sister chromatid cohesion. These cells also suffered increased spontaneous chromosome loss and meiotic defects and their viability was dependent on the spindle checkpoint protein Bub1. Thus, while S. pombe Pds5 has an important cohesin-related role, this differs significantly from that of the equivalent budding yeast protein.

scholarly journals ConnectingGCN5’s centromeric SAGA to the mitotic tension-sensing checkpoint

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2201-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Petty ◽  
Masha Evpak ◽  
Lorraine Pillus
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Binding Function ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Histone H3 Variant ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Centromere Histone H3 ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Multiple interdependent mechanisms ensure faithful segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Among these, the spindle assembly checkpoint monitors attachment of spindle microtubules to the centromere of each chromosome, whereas the tension-sensing checkpoint monitors the opposing forces between sister chromatid centromeres for proper biorientation. We report here a new function for the deeply conserved Gcn5 acetyltransferase in the centromeric localization of Rts1, a key player in the tension-sensing checkpoint. Rts1 is a regulatory component of protein phopshatase 2A, a near universal phosphatase complex, which is recruited to centromeres by the Shugoshin (Sgo) checkpoint component under low-tension conditions to maintain sister chromatid cohesion. We report that loss of Gcn5 disrupts centromeric localization of Rts1. Increased RTS1 dosage robustly suppresses gcn5∆ cell cycle and chromosome segregation defects, including restoration of Rts1 to centromeres. Sgo1’s Rts1-binding function also plays a key role in RTS1 dosage suppression of gcn5∆ phenotypes. Notably, we have identified residues of the centromere histone H3 variant Cse4 that function in these chromosome segregation-related roles of RTS1. Together, these findings expand the understanding of the mechanistic roles of Gcn5 and Cse4 in chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals NudCL2 is an Hsp90 cochaperone to regulate sister chromatid cohesion by stabilizing cohesin subunits

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuehong Yang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Yuliang Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atpase Activity ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chaperone Function ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Protein Instability ◽  
The Stability

AbstractSister chromatid cohesion plays a key role in ensuring precise chromosome segregation during mitosis, which is mediated by the multisubunit complex cohesin. However, the molecular regulation of cohesin subunits stability remains unclear. Here, we show that NudCL2 (NudC-like protein 2) is essential for the stability of cohesin subunits by regulating Hsp90 ATPase activity in mammalian cells. Depletion of NudCL2 induces mitotic defects and premature sister chromatid separation and destabilizes cohesin subunits that interact with NudCL2. Similar defects are also observed upon inhibition of Hsp90 ATPase activity. Interestingly, ectopic expression of Hsp90 efficiently rescues the protein instability and functional deficiency of cohesin induced by NudCL2 depletion, but not vice versa. Moreover, NudCL2 not only binds to Hsp90, but also significantly modulates Hsp90 ATPase activity and promotes the chaperone function of Hsp90. Taken together, these data suggest that NudCL2 is a previously undescribed Hsp90 cochaperone to modulate sister chromatid cohesion by stabilizing cohesin subunits, providing a hitherto unrecognized mechanism that is crucial for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis.

scholarly journals Multiple determinants and consequences of cohesion fatigue in mammalian cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 1811-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hem Sapkota ◽  
Emilia Wasiak ◽  
John R. Daum ◽  
Gary J. Gorbsky
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Complete Separation ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Pulling Forces

Cells delayed in metaphase with intact mitotic spindles undergo cohesion fatigue, where sister chromatids separate asynchronously, while cells remain in mitosis. Cohesion fatigue requires release of sister chromatid cohesion. However, the pathways that breach sister chromatid cohesion during cohesion fatigue remain unknown. Using moderate-salt buffers to remove loosely bound chromatin cohesin, we show that “cohesive” cohesin is not released during chromatid separation during cohesion fatigue. Using a regulated protein heterodimerization system to lock different cohesin ring interfaces at specific times in mitosis, we show that the Wapl-mediated pathway of cohesin release is not required for cohesion fatigue. By manipulating microtubule stability and cohesin complex integrity in cell lines with varying sensitivity to cohesion fatigue, we show that rates of cohesion fatigue reflect a dynamic balance between spindle pulling forces and resistance to separation by interchromatid cohesion. Finally, while massive separation of chromatids in cohesion fatigue likely produces inviable cell progeny, we find that short metaphase delays, leading to partial chromatid separation, predispose cells to chromosome missegregation. Thus, complete separation of one or a few chromosomes and/or partial separation of sister chromatids may be an unrecognized but common source of chromosome instability that perpetuates the evolution of malignant cells in cancer.

scholarly journals Pericentromeric Sister Chromatid Cohesion Promotes Kinetochore Biorientation

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 3818-3827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessie M. Ng ◽  
William G. Waples ◽  
Brigitte D. Lavoie ◽  
Sue Biggins
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Genetic Analysis ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Specific Role ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Yeast Genes

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on sister kinetochores making bioriented attachments to microtubules from opposite poles. An essential regulator of biorientation is the Ipl1/Aurora B protein kinase that destabilizes improper microtubule–kinetochore attachments. To identify additional biorientation pathways, we performed a systematic genetic analysis between the ipl1-321 allele and all nonessential budding yeast genes. One of the mutants, mcm21Δ, precociously separates pericentromeres and this is associated with a defect in the binding of the Scc2 cohesin-loading factor at the centromere. Strikingly, Mcm21 becomes essential for biorientation when Ipl1 function is reduced, and this appears to be related to its role in pericentromeric cohesion. When pericentromeres are artificially tethered, Mcm21 is no longer needed for biorientation despite decreased Ipl1 activity. Taken together, these data reveal a specific role for pericentromeric linkage in ensuring kinetochore biorientation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document