Best Practices in Reducing or Preventing Student Behavior Problems

Author(s):  
David R. Dupper
1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Jo Campbell ◽  
Judith E. Dobson ◽  
Jane M. Bost

The behavior problems of students in mainstreamed classrooms may be due in part to the expectations of educators who have not internalized information on teaching the diversity of students found in that setting. The educators involved in this study were predominantly regular classroom teachers but also included counselors, librarians, special educators, administrators, etc. They appeared to perceive student behavior problems as more serious when displayed by nonhandicapped or physically handicapped students than when displayed by mentally handicapped students. The same educators recommended more behavioral treatments having an authoritarian orientation for nonhandicapped than for physically handicapped students. This study indicates educators need to develop attitudes and skills necessary for behavior management in the mainstreamed school environment.


2020 ◽  
pp. 002246692096108
Author(s):  
Briana Bronstein ◽  
Nicole Breeden ◽  
Todd A. Glover ◽  
Linda A. Reddy

Paraprofessionals are increasingly being hired to support students with special needs in schools and are key implementers of behavior interventions for students. However, research is limited on how paraprofessionals perceive the management of student behavior. Using a mixed-methods design approach, the current investigation assesses paraprofessionals’ perceptions of common student behavior problems in elementary school classrooms. Results indicate coached paraprofessionals had a greater likelihood of reporting operationally defined behavior concerns than controls. A qualitative constant comparative method of analysis of paraprofessionals’ behavior reports revealed themes of disruptive academic behaviors (off task, peer/verbal interactions, physical interference), aggressive behaviors (physical aggression toward people/objects, verbal aggression), noncompliance (physical/verbal refusal), and “other” behaviors (unclear/opposite or positive actions). Implications for practice and future research are discussed.


1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Langhorne ◽  
Leroy A. Stone ◽  
Gary J. Coles

A recently proposed multidimensional similarity analysis methodology was used to analyze the dimensionality of a set of selected behavior problems sometimes exhibited by elementary students in classroom situations. Judges were elementary school teachers who frequently encountered such behavior problems. The three extracted evaluation dimensions, accounting for 82% of the judgmental variance, were all readily interpretable. The success of this exploratory application of a multidimensional scaling procedure to educational concerns suggested further uses for such investigative methodologies with regard to other forms of educational judgment-evaluation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-141
Author(s):  
Meredith A. Weber ◽  
Sara E. House Rich ◽  
Gary J. Duhon

Check-in/check-out (CICO) is a well-established Tier 2 intervention to address at-risk student behavior problems. Despite its widespread empirical support and applied use, CICO can be taxing for teachers to implement when there is insufficient time available and teacher self-efficacy in addressing behavior problems is low. Evaluation of CICO is necessary to promote smarter decision making and efficient service delivery for students at risk of developing more severe problem behaviors. The discussion article outlines one method to identify the exact amount of Tier 2 support needed to improve an individual student’s behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document