scholarly journals Screening instruments for cognitive impairment in older patients in the Emergency Department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agneta H Calf ◽  
Maaike A Pouw ◽  
Barbara C van Munster ◽  
Johannes G M Burgerhof ◽  
Sophia E de Rooij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Screening Instruments ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Index Tests

Abstract Background cognitive impairment is highly prevalent among older patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) and is associated with adverse outcomes. Methods we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening instruments to rule out cognitive impairment in older patients in the ED. A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL. A risk of bias assessment using QUADAS-2 was performed. Results 23 articles, examining 18 different index tests were included. Only seven index tests could be included in the meta-analysis. For ruling out cognitive impairment irrespective of aetiology, Ottawa 3 Day Year (O3DY) (pooled sensitivity 0.90; (95% CI) 0.71–0.97) had the highest sensitivity. Fourteen articles focused on screening for cognitive impairment specifically caused by delirium. For ruling out delirium, the 4 A’s Test (4AT) showed highest sensitivity (pooled sensitivity 0.87, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.74–0.94). Conclusions high clinical and methodological heterogeneity was found between included studies. Therefore, it is a challenge to recommend one diagnostic test for use as a screening instrument for cognitive impairment in the ED. The 4AT and O3DY seem most promising for ruling out cognitive impairment in older patients attending the ED. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018082509).

scholarly journals Risk Factors and Screening Instruments to Predict Adverse Outcomes for Undifferentiated Older Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Carpenter ◽  
Erica Shelton ◽  
Susan Fowler ◽  
Brian Suffoletto ◽  
Timothy F. Platts-Mills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Screening Instruments ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

scholarly journals Effectiveness of technology-based interventions in detection, prevention, monitoring and treatment of patients at risk or diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e045978
Author(s):  
Jordi Martínez-Soldevila ◽  
Roland Pastells-Peiró ◽  
Carolina Climent-Sanz ◽  
Gerard Piñol-Ripoll ◽  
Mariona Rocaspana-García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Disorders ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Review Protocol

IntroductionThe gradual changes over the decades in the longevity and ageing of European society as a whole can be directly related to the prolonged decline in the birth rate and increase in the life expectancy. According to the WHO, there is an increased risk of dementia or other cognitive disorders as the population ages, which have a major impact on public health. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is described as a greater than expected cognitive decline for an individual’s age and level of education, but that does not significantly interfere with activities of daily living. Patients with MCI exhibit a higher risk of dementia compared with others in the same age group, but without a cognitive decline, have impaired walking and a 50% greater risk of falling.The urban lifestyle and advent of smartphones, mobility and immediate access to all information via the internet, including health information, has led to a totally disruptive change in most general aspects.This systematic review protocol is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of technology-based interventions in the detection, prevention, monitoring and treatment of patients at risk or diagnosed with MCI.Methods and analysisThis review protocol follows the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols reporting guidelines. The search will be performed on MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases from 2010 to 2020. Studies of interventions either randomised clinical trials or pre–post non-randomised quasi-experimental designs, published in English and Spanish will be included. Articles that provide relevant information on the use of technology and its effectiveness in interventions that assess improvements in early detection, prevention, follow-up and treatment of the patients at risk or diagnosed with MCI will be included.Ethics and disseminationEthics committee approval not required. The results will be disseminated in publications and congresses.

scholarly journals Bidirectional brain–gut axis effects influence mood and prognosis in IBD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2021-325985
Author(s):  
Keeley M Fairbrass ◽  
Jessica Lovatt ◽  
Brigida Barberio ◽  
Yuhong Yuan ◽  
David J Gracie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Psychological Health ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Emergency Department Attendance ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
The Brain

ObjectiveThe role of the brain–gut axis is of increasing interest in IBD, as the link between common mental disorders and GI inflammation may be bidirectional. We performed a systematic review examining these issues.DesignWe searched EMBASE Classic and EMBASE, Medline, and APA PsychInfo (to 11 July 2021) for longitudinal follow-up studies examining effect of symptoms of anxiety or depression on subsequent adverse outcomes in IBD, or effect of active IBD on subsequent development of symptoms of anxiety or depression. We pooled relative risks (RRs) and HRs with 95% CIs for adverse outcomes (flare, escalation of therapy, hospitalisation, emergency department attendance, surgery or a composite of any of these) according to presence of symptoms of anxiety or depression at baseline, or RRs and HRs with 95% CIs for new onset of symptoms of anxiety or depression according to presence of active IBD at baseline.ResultsWe included 12 separate studies, recruiting 9192 patients. All 12 studies examined brain-to-gut effects. Anxiety at baseline was associated with significantly higher risks of escalation of therapy (RR=1.68; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.40), hospitalisation (RR=1.72; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.95), emergency department attendance (RR=1.30; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.39), or a composite of any adverse outcome. Depression at baseline was associated with higher risks of flare (RR=1.60; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.12), escalation of therapy (RR=1.41; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.84), hospitalisation (RR=1.35; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.57), emergency department attendance (RR=1.38; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.56), surgery (RR=1.63; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.22) or a composite of any of these. Three studies examined gut-to-brain effects. Active disease at baseline was associated with future development of anxiety or depression (RR=2.24; 95% CI 1.25 to 4.01 and RR=1.49; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.98, respectively).ConclusionBidirectional effects of the brain–gut axis are present in IBD and may influence both the natural history of the disease and psychological health.

scholarly journals Discharging older patients from the emergency department effectively: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 761-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy A. Lowthian ◽  
Rosemary A. McGinnes ◽  
Caroline A. Brand ◽  
Anna L. Barker ◽  
Peter A. Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test for Screening Cognitive Impairment: A Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn O'Sullivan ◽  
Niamh A. O'Regan ◽  
Suzanne Timmons
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Validation Studies ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Routine Screening ◽  
Screening Instruments ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Acute Hospitals

Background: A large proportion of older adults with dementia remain undiagnosed, presenting to hospital with occult dementia, and are at risk for adverse outcomes, especially delirium. Routine screening for cognitive impairment among older adult patients presenting to acute hospitals could help alleviate this problem; however, this is hampered by time constraints, poor knowledge of screening instruments and lack of consensus as to which screening tool is best. Cognitive tests with attention items may be particularly useful in acute settings, given the importance of delirium detection. However, it is crucial that cognitive screening instruments are fast and reliable. Summary: The Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) is a feasible instrument for cognitive screening among older adults attending a general practitioner or hospital. Although researchers have investigated its accuracy in diagnosing cognitive impairment in primary and secondary care settings, its validity in primary care use has been questioned and there are limited validation studies on its use in secondary care. Key Messages: This paper presents a review of validation studies conducted on the 6-CIT. We recommend that larger studies, which test the psychometric properties of the 6-CIT in primary and acute care settings, are conducted to establish recommendations for routine screening use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document