scholarly journals Residential aged care in Auckland, New Zealand 1988-2008: do real trends over time match predictions?

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Broad ◽  
M. Boyd ◽  
N. Kerse ◽  
N. Whitehead ◽  
C. Chelimo ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M Garratt ◽  
Ngaire M Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique F Jonas

Abstract Background A medication omission is an event where a prescribed medication is not taken before the next scheduled dose. Medication omissions are typically classed as errors within Residential Aged Care (RAC) homes, as they have the potential to lead to harm if poorly managed, but may also stem from good clinical decision-making. This study aimed to quantify the incidence, prevalence, and types of medication omissions in RAC homes on a national scale, using a New Zealand-based sample. Methods We conducted retrospective pharmacoepidemiology of de-identified medication administration e-records from December 1st 2016 to December 31st 2017. Four tiers of de-identified data were collected: RAC home level data (ownership, levels of care), care staff level data (competency level/role), resident data (gender, age, level of care), and medication related data (omissions, categories of omissions, recorded reasons for omission). Data were analysed using SPSS version 24 and Microsoft Excel.Results A total of 11, 015 residents from 374 RAC homes had active medication charts; 8,020 resided in care over the entire sample timeframe. A mean rate of 3.59 medication doses were omitted per 100 (±7.43) dispensed doses/resident. Seventy-three percent of residents had at least one dose omission. The most common omission category used was ‘not-administered’ (49.9%), followed by ‘refused’ (34.6%). The relationship between ownership type and mean rate of omission was significant (p=0.002), corporate operated RAC homes had a slightly higher mean (3.73 versus 3.33), with greater variation. The most commonly omitted medications were Analgesics and Laxatives. Forty-eight percent of all dose omissions were recorded without a comment justifying the omission. Conclusions This unique study is the first to report rate of medication omissions per RAC resident over a one-year timeframe. Although the proportion of medications omitted reported in this study is less than previously reported by hospital-based studies, there is a significant relationship between a resident’s level of care, RAC home ownership types, and the rate of omission.


Urban Studies ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 917-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Byles ◽  
Cassie Curryer ◽  
Kha Vo ◽  
Peta Forder ◽  
Deborah Loxton ◽  
...  

Scant research exists on the patterns of changes in older women’s housing, and whether and when women transition into residential aged care (RAC). This study aimed to identify groups of women with different housing patterns (latent classes) over time, with a secondary aim to describe socio-demographic and health characteristics of women in each class. We analysed linked data for 9575 women born 1921–1926 from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Health (ALSWH), Australian National Death Index, and Residential Aged Care (RAC) administrative records for the years 1999 through to 2011. Seven distinct housing patterns (classes) were identified over time. Four classes showed a stable pattern: living in a house for most surveys (47.0%), living in a house but with earlier death (13.7%), living in an apartment (12.8%), living in a retirement village (5.8%). One class showed a pattern of downsizing: moving from a house to retirement village (6.6%). Two patterns showed transition: from an apartment or retirement village, to RAC and death (7.8%), and from house to RAC (6.4%). This study provides new evidence about socio-demographic and health influences on housing patterns and entry into residential care in later life. These findings can inform policy and aged care planning for women in later life, by identifying patterns of transition into residential aged care, or alternatively, remaining in the community.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry C. Ndukwe ◽  
Prasad S. Nishtala ◽  
Ting Wang ◽  
June M. Tordoff

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Antipsychotic medicines are used regularly or when required in residential aged care facilities to treat symptoms of dementia, but have been associated with several adverse effects. AIM The aim of this study was to examine ‘quality use’ of antipsychotic medicines in residential aged care facilities in New Zealand, by surveying nurse managers. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 318 nurse managers working in a nationally representative sample of aged care facilities. A purpose-developed, pre-tested, 22-item structured questionnaire was used to explore practice related to the quality use of antipsychotic medicines. RESULTS Overall, 31.4% of nurse managers responded to the survey. They mostly (88%) had ≥ 1 year’s relevant work experience and 83% of facilities provided care for those within the range of 21 to 100 residents. Respondents reported that staff education on dementia management occurred early in employment. Two-thirds of participants reported non-pharmacological interventions were commonly used for managing challenging behaviours, while less than half (45%) cited administering antipsychotic medicine. Respondents reported ‘managing behavioural symptoms’ (81%) as one of the main indications for antipsychotic use. Frequently identified adverse effects of antipsychotic medicines were drowsiness or sedation (64%) and falls (61%). Over 90% reported general practitioners reviewed antipsychotic use with respect to residents’ target behaviour 3-monthly, and two-thirds used an assessment tool to appraise residents’ behaviour. DISCUSSION Staff education on dementia management soon after employment and resident 3-monthly antipsychotic medicine reviews were positive findings. However, a wider use of behavioural assessment tools might improve the care of residents with dementia and the quality use of antipsychotic medicines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie. M. Garratt ◽  
Ngaire. M. Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique. F. Jonas

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Frey ◽  
Michal Boyd ◽  
Sue Foster ◽  
Jackie Robinson ◽  
Merryn Gott

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M Garratt ◽  
Ngaire M Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique F Jonas

Abstract Background Medication administration is a key service offered to individuals residing in residential aged care homes (RAC homes). A medication omission is an event where a prescribed medication is not taken by a resident before the next scheduled dose. Medication omissions are typically classed as errors, they have the potential to lead to harm if poorly managed, but may also stem from good clinical decision-making. Studies that critically appraise or support medication omissions in healthcare settings are limited. There is uncertainty around which medication omissions are problematic and how many on average a patient should experience. There have been several hospital-based studies, with limited sample sizes, timeframes, and inconsistent reporting of omissions. As the first population-level, RAC Home-specific study of its kind, this study quantifies the incidence, prevalence, and types of medication omissions in RAC homes on a national scale. Methods A retrospective review of de-identified, medication administration e-records from December 1 st 2016 to December 31 st 2017 was conducted. Demographic details of residents, care staff competency levels, medications, and RAC ownership types were included in the review and analysis. Results A total of 11, 015 residents from 374 RAC homes had active medication charts; 8,020 resided in care over the entire data collection period. A mean rate of 3.40 medications doses were omitted per 100 dispensed medications doses per resident (s.d. 7.27). Approximately 73% of residents had at least one dose omission. The most common selected omission category was ‘not-administered’ (49.9%), followed by ‘refused’ (34.6%). The mean rate of omission was found to be slightly higher in corporate operated RAC Homes (3.73 versus 3.33), with greater variation. The most commonly omitted medications were Analgesics and Laxatives. Forty-eight percent of all dose omissions were recorded without a comment justifying the omission. Conclusions Compared to other studies medication omissions within RAC homes in New Zealand are not as common as previously proposed. This study sets out the first national-level rate of medication omissions per resident over a one-year timeframe. Subsequent studies will address the medications omitted, the clinical significance of omissions and the place of medication omissions within clinical decision-making.


2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Andrews-Hall ◽  
Anna Howe ◽  
Andrew Robinson

The aims of this paper are to analyse changes in dependency of residents in residential aged care homes consequent upon the passing of the Commonwealth Aged Care Act in late 1997, and to establish the extent of resultant changes in the dynamics of residential aged care. The paper outlines the major changes brought by the Aged Care Act, and evidence for the effects of these changes is examined to test the hypothesis that changes in dependency generated changes in turnover and length of stay. The findings show that the proportion of admissions classified at higher categories of the Resident Classification Scale has increased over time, and that the trend to higher classification is even more pronounced by the time residents separate. As funding of residential aged care is based on resident dependency, change in dependency and in the dynamics of the aged care system have potentially significant consequences for Commonwealth funding of providers to ensure care can be provided commensurate with resident needs. The conclusions take up a number of implications of the findings for future policy in relation to planning and funding of residential aged care as a new resident funding system based on the Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) is phased in from mid 2007.


Nephrology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Ethier ◽  
Yeoungjee Cho ◽  
Christopher E. Davies ◽  
Carmel M. Hawley ◽  
Scott B. Campbell ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 535-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Boyd ◽  
Joanna B. Broad ◽  
Ngaire Kerse ◽  
Susan Foster ◽  
Martin von Randow ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document