scholarly journals Medication omission rates in New Zealand residential aged care homes: a national description

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie. M. Garratt ◽  
Ngaire. M. Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique. F. Jonas
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M Garratt ◽  
Ngaire M Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique F Jonas

Abstract Background Medication administration is a key service offered to individuals residing in residential aged care homes (RAC homes). A medication omission is an event where a prescribed medication is not taken by a resident before the next scheduled dose. Medication omissions are typically classed as errors, they have the potential to lead to harm if poorly managed, but may also stem from good clinical decision-making. Studies that critically appraise or support medication omissions in healthcare settings are limited. There is uncertainty around which medication omissions are problematic and how many on average a patient should experience. There have been several hospital-based studies, with limited sample sizes, timeframes, and inconsistent reporting of omissions. As the first population-level, RAC Home-specific study of its kind, this study quantifies the incidence, prevalence, and types of medication omissions in RAC homes on a national scale. Methods A retrospective review of de-identified, medication administration e-records from December 1 st 2016 to December 31 st 2017 was conducted. Demographic details of residents, care staff competency levels, medications, and RAC ownership types were included in the review and analysis. Results A total of 11, 015 residents from 374 RAC homes had active medication charts; 8,020 resided in care over the entire data collection period. A mean rate of 3.40 medications doses were omitted per 100 dispensed medications doses per resident (s.d. 7.27). Approximately 73% of residents had at least one dose omission. The most common selected omission category was ‘not-administered’ (49.9%), followed by ‘refused’ (34.6%). The mean rate of omission was found to be slightly higher in corporate operated RAC Homes (3.73 versus 3.33), with greater variation. The most commonly omitted medications were Analgesics and Laxatives. Forty-eight percent of all dose omissions were recorded without a comment justifying the omission. Conclusions Compared to other studies medication omissions within RAC homes in New Zealand are not as common as previously proposed. This study sets out the first national-level rate of medication omissions per resident over a one-year timeframe. Subsequent studies will address the medications omitted, the clinical significance of omissions and the place of medication omissions within clinical decision-making.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Garratt ◽  
Ngaire M. Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique F. Jonas ◽  
Shane L. Scahil

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica A. L. Borbasi ◽  
Allison Tong ◽  
Alison Ritchie ◽  
Christopher J. Poulos ◽  
Josephine M. Clayton

Abstract Background End of life care for residents with advanced dementia in the aged care setting is complex. There is prolonged and progressive cognitive decline, uncertain disease trajectory, significant symptom burden and infrequent access to specialist palliative care. Residential aged care managers offer a unique perspective in understanding the experience of providing end of life care for residents with advanced dementia. They bring insight from the coalface to the broader policy context. The aim of this study was to describe the experience and perspectives of residential aged care managers on providing end of life care for residents living with dementia. Methods Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with residential or care managers from various care homes from one dementia specific aged care organisation in Australia. A comprehensive sampling strategy was used in participating care homes. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Results 20 residential or care managers from 11 aged care homes in two states of Australia participated in two focus groups (total 16 participants) or individual interviews (4 participants). Six themes were identified: laying the ground work to establish what families understand about dementia, playing the peacemaker in the face of unrealistic family demands and expectations, chipping away at denial and cultivating a path towards acceptance of death, recruiting general practitioners as allies, supporting and strengthening the front line, and dedication to optimal care is relentless but rewarding. Conclusion Aged care manager participants described provision of end of life dementia care as a rewarding but sometimes fraught experience requiring persistent personalisation of care and communication to enable family acceptance of the resident’s terminal condition. The findings suggest that continuous front line aged care staff skill development, iterative family discussions, and partnership building between aged care staff and general practitioners, are all required to promote optimal end of life dementia care in residential aged care settings.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M Garratt ◽  
Ngaire M Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique F Jonas

Abstract Background A medication omission is an event where a prescribed medication is not taken before the next scheduled dose. Medication omissions are typically classed as errors within Residential Aged Care (RAC) homes, as they have the potential to lead to harm if poorly managed, but may also stem from good clinical decision-making. This study aimed to quantify the incidence, prevalence, and types of medication omissions in RAC homes on a national scale, using a New Zealand-based sample. Methods We conducted retrospective pharmacoepidemiology of de-identified medication administration e-records from December 1st 2016 to December 31st 2017. Four tiers of de-identified data were collected: RAC home level data (ownership, levels of care), care staff level data (competency level/role), resident data (gender, age, level of care), and medication related data (omissions, categories of omissions, recorded reasons for omission). Data were analysed using SPSS version 24 and Microsoft Excel.Results A total of 11, 015 residents from 374 RAC homes had active medication charts; 8,020 resided in care over the entire sample timeframe. A mean rate of 3.59 medication doses were omitted per 100 (±7.43) dispensed doses/resident. Seventy-three percent of residents had at least one dose omission. The most common omission category used was ‘not-administered’ (49.9%), followed by ‘refused’ (34.6%). The relationship between ownership type and mean rate of omission was significant (p=0.002), corporate operated RAC homes had a slightly higher mean (3.73 versus 3.33), with greater variation. The most commonly omitted medications were Analgesics and Laxatives. Forty-eight percent of all dose omissions were recorded without a comment justifying the omission. Conclusions This unique study is the first to report rate of medication omissions per RAC resident over a one-year timeframe. Although the proportion of medications omitted reported in this study is less than previously reported by hospital-based studies, there is a significant relationship between a resident’s level of care, RAC home ownership types, and the rate of omission.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1975-1983
Author(s):  
Julie M. Ellis ◽  
Beatriz Paulina Ayala Quintanilla ◽  
Louise Ward ◽  
Fergus Campbell ◽  
Stav Hillel ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Broad ◽  
M. Boyd ◽  
N. Kerse ◽  
N. Whitehead ◽  
C. Chelimo ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry C. Ndukwe ◽  
Prasad S. Nishtala ◽  
Ting Wang ◽  
June M. Tordoff

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Antipsychotic medicines are used regularly or when required in residential aged care facilities to treat symptoms of dementia, but have been associated with several adverse effects. AIM The aim of this study was to examine ‘quality use’ of antipsychotic medicines in residential aged care facilities in New Zealand, by surveying nurse managers. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 318 nurse managers working in a nationally representative sample of aged care facilities. A purpose-developed, pre-tested, 22-item structured questionnaire was used to explore practice related to the quality use of antipsychotic medicines. RESULTS Overall, 31.4% of nurse managers responded to the survey. They mostly (88%) had ≥ 1 year’s relevant work experience and 83% of facilities provided care for those within the range of 21 to 100 residents. Respondents reported that staff education on dementia management occurred early in employment. Two-thirds of participants reported non-pharmacological interventions were commonly used for managing challenging behaviours, while less than half (45%) cited administering antipsychotic medicine. Respondents reported ‘managing behavioural symptoms’ (81%) as one of the main indications for antipsychotic use. Frequently identified adverse effects of antipsychotic medicines were drowsiness or sedation (64%) and falls (61%). Over 90% reported general practitioners reviewed antipsychotic use with respect to residents’ target behaviour 3-monthly, and two-thirds used an assessment tool to appraise residents’ behaviour. DISCUSSION Staff education on dementia management soon after employment and resident 3-monthly antipsychotic medicine reviews were positive findings. However, a wider use of behavioural assessment tools might improve the care of residents with dementia and the quality use of antipsychotic medicines.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Marie Dyer ◽  
Enwu Liu ◽  
Emmanuel Gnanamanickam ◽  
Stephanie Louise Harrison ◽  
Rachel Milte ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The value of providing access to outdoor areas for people living in residential aged care, including those living with dementia, in terms of mood, behaviour and well-being is increasingly acknowledged. This study examines associations between provision of independent access to outdoor areas and frequency of residents going outdoors with the quality of life (QoL) of nursing home residents and compares use of outdoor areas between alternative models of residential aged care. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted including 541 participants from 17 residential aged care homes in four states in Australia, mean age 85 years, 84% with cognitive impairment. Associations between having independent access to outdoors and the frequency of going outdoors and QoL (EQ-5D-5L) were examined using multi-level models. The odds of going outdoors in a small-scale home-like model of care compared to standard Australian models of care were examined. Results After adjustment for potential confounders (including comorbidities and facility level variables), living in an aged care home with independent access to the outdoors was not significantly associated with QoL (β=-0.01, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.07, P=0.80). However, going outdoors daily (β=0.13 95%CI 0.06 to 0.21), but not multiple times a week (β=0.03, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.09), was associated with a better QoL. Residents living in a home-like model of care had greater odds of going outdoors daily (odds ratio 15.1, 95%CI 6.3 to 36.2). Conclusions Going outdoors frequently is associated with higher QoL for residents of aged care homes and residents are more likely to get outside daily if they live in a small-scale home-like model of care. However, provision of independent access to outdoor areas alone may be insufficient to achieve these benefits. Increased availability of models of residential aged care with staffing structures, training and design which increases support for residents to venture outdoors frequently is needed to maximise resident quality of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document