scholarly journals 90ADMISSION AVOIDANCE IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - WHAT WORKS FOR FRAIL OLDER PEOPLE: THE EXEMPLAR FRONT DOOR (EFD) INITIATIVE

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii31-iii42
Author(s):  
A Arora ◽  
E Holmes ◽  
A M Morris ◽  
J Norton ◽  
T Bates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Older People ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
Front Door ◽  
What Works

scholarly journals Models of care for frail older persons who present to the emergency department: a scoping review protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Ling Huang ◽  
Megan McGonagle ◽  
Rebecca Shaw ◽  
Julie Eastham ◽  
Nemat Alsaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Older People ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Older Persons ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
The Body ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
Frail Older Persons

Abstract Background People aged ≥ 65 years comprise around 1 in 5 emergency department (ED) presentations. Many of these presentations occur due to complications associated with chronic diseases and frailty. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of available research regarding models of care for frail older people presenting to the ED. Methods The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review framework will be used to guide this review. Literature searches will be conducted in the following electronic databases (from January 2009 onwards): CINAHL via EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, SocINDEX. Grey literature will be identified through searching Google Scholar. This review will consider primary research studies (including observational and interventional studies) published in English on models of care for frail older people (aged ≥ 65) presenting to the ED. Two researchers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Potential disagreements will be resolved through discussion with a third researcher. Data extracted from included studies will include the following: author(s), year of publication, country, research design and aim, time frame of the study, study population and sample size, data collection methods, definition of frailty, model of care, and key findings that pertain to the ability to inform this review. The strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using the National Health and Medical Research Council level of evidence hierarchy body of evidence matrix. Data will be presented in a tabular format and accompanied by a narrative that describes the characteristics of the body of literature. Discussion Despite the increased number of ED presentations for frail older people, there has been no synthesis of the sources of evidence of model of care for frail older people in the setting of emergency care. The results of this scoping review will provide an overview of different models of care and help inform future research in the development of models of care for frail older persons, tailored to the healthcare system in the emergency context. Systematic review registration This scoping review has been registered in the Open Science Framework (osf.io/h2t94).

scholarly journals Emergency care for frail older people—urgent AND important—but what works?

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 724-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Conroy ◽  
Gertrude Chikura
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
What Works

scholarly journals Fall Prevention in Dutch Physician Practices: A Descriptive Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Wytske Meekes ◽  
C J Leemrijse ◽  
J C Korevaar ◽  
L A M van de Goor
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Older People ◽  
Fall Prevention ◽  
Fear Of Falling ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Important Health ◽  
Underlying Causes

Abstract Falls are an important health threat among frail older people. Physicians are often the first to contact for health issues and can be seen as designated professionals to provide fall prevention. However, it is unknown what they exactly do and why regarding fall prevention. This study aims to describe what physicians in the Netherlands do during daily practice in regards to fall prevention. About 65 physicians (34 practices) located throughout the Netherlands were followed up for 12 months. When a physician entered specific ICPC-codes related to frailty and falls in the Hospital Information System, the physician received a pop-up asking if the patient is frail. If so, the physician subsequently completed a questionnaire. The physicians completed 1396 questionnaires. More than half (n=726) of the patients had experienced a fall in the previous year and/or had a fear of falling (FOF) and 37% of these patients received fall prevention. Physicians did not know of 20% of the patients if they had experienced a fall and of 29% of the patients if they had a FOF. The three most often treated underlying causes were mobility problems, FOF and cardiovascular risk factors. The results show that physicians are not always aware of a patient’s fall history and/or FOF and that only part of these patients receives fall prevention. Hence, it might be important to develop and implement strategies for systematic fall risk screening and fall prevention provision in the primary care setting to reduce falls among frail older people.

81 Integrating A Front Door Frailty Service in the Emergency Department: Results of A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
L Dunnell ◽  
A Shrestha ◽  
E Li ◽  
Z Khan ◽  
N Hashemi
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Service Improvement ◽  
Specialist Nurse ◽  
Front Door ◽  
Medication Changes ◽  
Health Service Improvement

Abstract Introduction Increasing old age and frailty is putting pressure on health services with 5–10% of patients attending the emergency department (ED) and 30% of patients in acute medical units classified as older and frail. National Health Service improvement mandates that by 2020 hospital trusts with type one EDs provide at least 70 hours of acute frailty service each week. Methodology A two-week pilot (Monday–Friday 8 am-5 pm) was undertaken, with a “Front Door Frailty Team” comprising a consultant, junior doctor, specialist nurse and pharmacist, with therapy input from the existing ED team. They were based in the ED seeing patients on arrival, referrals from the ED team and patients in the ED observation ward—opposed to the usual pathway of referral from the ED team to medical team. Data was captured using “Cerner” electronic healthcare records. A plan, do, study, act methodology was used throughout with daily debrief and huddle sessions. Results 95 patients were seen over two weeks. In the over 65 s, average time to be seen was 50 minutes quicker than the ED team over the same period, with reduced admission rate (25.7% vs 46.5%). The wait between decision to admit and departure was shortened by 119 minutes. Overall, this led to patients spending on average 133 minutes less in the ED. 64 patients were discharged, of which 44 had community follow-up (including 37.5% of 64 referred to acute elderly clinic and 25% to rapid response). 47 medications were stopped across 25 patients. Conclusion The pilot shows that introduction of an early comprehensive geriatric assessment in the ED can lead to patients being seen sooner, with more timely decisions over their care and reduction in hospital admissions. It allowed for greater provision of acute clinics and community services as well as prompt medication review and real time medication changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document