A novel botanical formula improves eye fatigue and dry eye: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

ABSTRACT Background With the frequent use of video display units, eye fatigue is becoming more common globally. An alternative nutritional strategy is needed to prevent the aggravation of eye fatigue symptoms. Objectives The objective was to evaluate the protective effect of a novel botanical combination of lutein ester, zeaxanthin, and extracts of blackcurrant, chrysanthemum, and goji berry on adults with eye fatigue in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Methods We randomly allocated 360 participants into 4 groups to receive placebo and 3 doses of our formula (chewable tablets, containing 6 mg, 10 mg, or 14 mg of lutein) once daily for 90 d. Each participant had 3 visits at baseline (V1), 45 d (V2), and 90 d (V3) during the study. Results Intervention with the formula improved individual scores of eye fatigue symptoms, including eye soreness, blurred vision, dry eye, foreign body sensation, and tearing. Compared with placebo, the formula at all 3 doses significantly decreased the total score of eye fatigue symptoms and increased the visuognosis persistence time at both V2 and V3. According to the Schirmer test, both 10-mg and 14-mg lutein formula groups had improved tear secretion at V3 compared with the placebo. The keratography results indicated that the first tear break-up time, average tear break-up time, and tear meniscus height were significantly increased after formula intervention. The formula at all 3 doses significantly increased the macular pigment optical density at V2 and V3 compared with the placebo, whereas optical coherence tomography showed no significant difference in retinal thickness and retinal volume across all groups at both visits. Conclusions Our botanical formula improves eye fatigue, dry eye, and macular function without changing the retinal structure, and thus it could serve as an effective nutritional strategy in improving eye fatigue without causing serious side effects. Clinical Trial Registry: chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800018987).

Download Full-text

A 12-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial for Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DKB114 on Reduction of Uric Acid in Serum

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu12123794 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (12) ◽

pp. 3794

Author(s):

Yu Hwa Park ◽

Do Hoon Kim ◽

Jung Suk Lee ◽

Hyun Il Jeong ◽

Kye Wan Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Uric Acid ◽

Placebo Group ◽

Serum Uric Acid ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Food Ingredient ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Significant Difference

This study sought to investigate the antihyperuricemia efficacy and safety of DKB114 (a mixture of Chrysanthemum indicum Linn flower extract and Cinnamomum cassia extract) to evaluate its potential as a dietary supplement ingredient. This clinical trial was a randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 80 subjects (40 subjects with an intake of DKB114 and 40 subjects with that of placebo) who had asymptomatic hyperuricemia (7.0–9.0 mg/dL with serum uric acid) was randomly assigned. No significant difference between the DKB114 and placebo groups was observed in the amount of uric acid in serum after six weeks of intake. However, after 12 weeks of intake, the uric acid level in serum of subjects in the DKB114 group decreased by 0.58 ± 0.86 mg/dL and was 7.37 ± 0.92 mg/dL, whereas that in the placebo group decreased by 0.02 ± 0.93 mg/dL and was 7.67 ± 0.89 mg/dL, a significant difference (p = 0.0229). In the analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP) change, after 12 weeks of administration, the DKB114 group showed an increase of 0.05 ± 0.27 mg/dL (p = 0.3187), while the placebo group showed an increase of 0.10 ± 0.21 mg/dL (p = 0.0324), a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0443). In the analysis of amount of change in apoprotein B, after 12 weeks of administration, the DKB114 group decreased by 4.75 ± 16.69 mg/dL (p = 0.1175), and the placebo group increased by 3.13 ± 12.64 mg/dL (p = 0.2187), a statistically significant difference between the administration groups (p = 0.0189). In the clinical pathology test, vital signs and weight measurement, and electrocardiogram test conducted for safety evaluation, no clinically significant difference was found between the ingestion groups, confirming the safety of DKB114. Therefore, it may have potential as a treatment for hyperuricemia and gout. We suggest that DKB114 as a beneficial and safe food ingredient for individuals with high serum uric acid. Trial registration (CRIS.NIH. go. Kr): KCT0002840.

Download Full-text

Riluzole for treatment of men with methamphetamine dependence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Journal of Psychopharmacology ◽

10.1177/0269881118817166 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 33 (3) ◽

pp. 305-315 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Mohammad-Hadi Farahzadi ◽

Ehsan Moazen-Zadeh ◽

Emran Razaghi ◽

Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast ◽

Reza Bidaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Specific Treatment ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

P Value ◽

Urine Test ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Methamphetamine Dependence ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Riluzole is a glutamate regulator and effective in treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions. Aims: We assessed riluzole for treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, male outpatients with methamphetamine dependence who were 18–65 years old received either 50 mg riluzole ( n=34) or placebo ( n=54) twice daily for 12 weeks. Patients were excluded in case of comorbid serious medical conditions or neurologic disorders, comorbid psychiatric disorders other than methamphetamine dependence requiring specific treatment interventions, simultaneous positive urine test result for substances of abuse other than methamphetamine, smoking >3 days per week, simultaneous consumption of medications which are contraindicated or have interaction with riluzole. Results: Concerning primary outcomes, the cumulative mean number of attended weekly visits was higher in the riluzole arm compared with the placebo arm approaching a statistically significant difference (riluzole, median (range)=13.00 (2.00–13.00); placebo=4.00 (2.00–13.00); Mann-Whitney U=505.00, p-value=0.073), and the weekly measured rate of positive methamphetamine urine test results was significantly lower in the riluzole arm by the end of the study (riluzole=1 (5.00%), placebo=9 (45.00%), p-value=0.004). Patients in the riluzole arm experienced significantly greater improvement on all the craving, withdrawal, and depression measures regarding mean score changes from baseline to endpoint. No significant difference was detected between the two arms in terms of incidence of adverse events. Conclusion: Future randomized clinical trials are needed to investigate proper dosing strategy in a more inclusive sample.

Download Full-text

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial of Homoeopathic Arnica C30 for Pain and Infection after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine ◽

10.1177/014107689709000205 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 90 (2) ◽

pp. 73-78 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Oliver Hart ◽

Mark A Mullee ◽

George Lewith ◽

John Miller

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Placebo Group ◽

Total Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽

Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Significant Difference

Homoeopathic potencies of arnica have been used for many years to aid postoperative recovery. The effects of arnica C30 on pain and postoperative recovery after total abdominal hysterectomy were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Of 93 women entered into the study, 20 did not complete protocol treatment: nine were excluded because they failed to comply with the protocol, nine had their operations cancelled or changed within 24 h and two had to be withdrawn because of the recurrence of previously chronic painful conditions. Those who did not complete protocol treatment were equally divided between the arnica (nine patients) and placebo groups (11 patients). 73 patients completed the study, of whom 35 received placebo and 38 received arnica C30. The placebo group had a greater median age and the arnica group had slightly longer operations; nevertheless, no significant difference between the two groups could be demonstrated. We conclude that arnica in homoeopathic potency had no effect on postoperative recovery in the context of our study.

Download Full-text

The Effects of 6-Month Vitamin D Supplementation during the Non-Surgical Treatment of Periodontitis in Vitamin-D-Deficient Patients: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu12102940 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (10) ◽

pp. 2940

Author(s):

Marina Perić ◽

Dominique Maiter ◽

Etienne Cavalier ◽

Jérôme F. Lasserre ◽

Selena Toma

Keyword(s):

Vitamin D ◽

Vitamin D3 ◽

Test Group ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Control Group ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Pocket Depth ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Significant Difference

Background: This study assessed the effects of weekly vitamin D (VD) supplementation on clinical and biological parameters after scaling and root planning (SRP) in the treatment of periodontitis and served to validate the VD dosage regimen. Methods: It was a monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 6 months follow-up. Healthy Caucasian periodontitis patients presenting serum 25(OH) vitamin D3 below 30 ng/mL were randomly allocated to test group (SRP + VD 25,000 international units (IU)/week) or the control group (SRP + placebo). Results: A total of 59 patients were screened, 27 were included and 26 completed 3 months (M) and 21 completed 6M control. Test (n = 13) and control groups (n = 14) had similar 25(OH) vitamin D3 levels at baseline (17.6 ± 7.4 vs. 14.4 ± 5.2, respectively). After one month, there was a significant difference between groups (32.9 ± 5.2 vs. 16.1 ± 4.7), also seen at M3 and M6 (t-test, p < 0.001). Periodontal treatment was successful in both groups, since it resulted in a reduction of all measured clinical parameters at M3 and M6 (probing pocket depth (PPD), full mouth bleeding and plaque). However, the reduction in PPD was greater in the test group. Conclusions: In this short-term pilot study, no significant differences were observed between two groups. However, supplementation with VD tended to improve the treatment of periodontitis in patients with initial 25(OH) vitamin D3 < 30 ng/mL and proved safe and efficacious. NCT03162406.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of gabapentin mouthwash in managing oral mucositis pain in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial

Scottish Medical Journal ◽

10.1177/0036933019897237 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 65 (1) ◽

pp. 12-18

Author(s):

Shahram Ala ◽

Neda Zamani ◽

Jafar Akbari ◽

Ebrahim Salehifar ◽

Ghasem Janbabai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Pain Intensity ◽

Oral Mucositis ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Sufficient Evidence ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Significant Activity ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Significant Difference

Background and aims Gabapentin has been used for the management of radiotherapy and chemotherapy induced stomatitis in a number of studies. Due to lack of sufficient evidence, the present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin mouthwash in oral mucositis associated pain in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Methods and results This study was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients were randomly divided into two groups receiving either the gabapentin or placebo mouthwash. Patients were advised to rinse their mouth with 7 ml of solution for 30 s three times a day and were visited 10 days after initiation of the trial. The intensity of pain and severity of oral mucositis were assessed. Thirty-one patients received gabapentin mouthwash while 27 patients received placebo. Both gabapentin and placebo mouthwashes had decreased the pain intensity almost equally and did not show a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.73). Also both gabapentin and placebo had reduced and improved swallowing, inflammation and erythema. But there was no noticeable difference between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions These findings indicate that gabapentin mouthwash did not show a significant activity as a pain relieving agent in chemotherapy induced oral mucositis associated pain.

Download Full-text