Prognostic Value of Kras Mutations in Stage III Colon Cancer: Post-Hoc Analyses of the Petacc8 Phase III Trial

363 Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) has demonstrated antitumor activity against metastatic colorectal cancer used alone or with 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV). Two arms with CPT-11, 5FU, and LV (FOLFIRI) +/- cetuximab (Cmab) were originally included in N0147. However, after CALGB 89803 (J Clin Oncol. 25:3456, 2007), PETACC-3 (J Clin Oncol. 27:3117, 2009), and Accord02 (Ann Oncol. 20:674, 2009) showed no benefit to the three-drug combination in adjuvant therapy, the CPT-11 arms of N0147 were discontinued. We report the outcomes for patients given FOLFIRI +/- Cmab. Methods: Following a signed informed consent patients with resected stage III colon cancer were randomized to one of 6 arms including 12 biweekly cycles of CPT-11 180 mg/m2 d1 with LV 400 mg/m2, 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus IV, then 46-hr IV 5FU 2,400 mg/m2 on d1-2 without (Arm B, FOLFIRI) or with Cmab (Arm E) 400 mg/m2 d1 cycle 1 then Cmab at 250 mg/m2 d1 and 8. Primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: 156 patients (Arm B-111, Arm E-45) were enrolled; median follow-up on 81 patients in Arm B was 60.3 months and 58.2 months in Arm E for 41 patients. wtKRAS (vs mt) status was associated with improved DFS (HR=0.6 [95% CI 0.4-1.1], p = 0.09) and OS (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.4-1.5], p = 0.38). The addition of Cmab improved DFS and OS in the overall group and within wtKRAS pts. Grade greater than III non-hematologic adverse effects were significantly increased in the Cmab arm (46% vs. 64%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: In this randomized phase III trial adjuvant FOLFIRI resulted in a 3-year DFS lower than that expected for FOLFOX. Trends for improved DFS and OS with the addition of Cmab were observed in patients with resected stage III colon cancer patients, regardless of KRAS status. Supported by NIH Grant CA25224, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Six months versus twelve months of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III (Dukes' C) colon cancer: Initial safety report for the open-label randomized phase III study (JFMC37-0801).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3607 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3607-3607 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Katsuyuki Kunieda ◽

Sotaro Sadahiro ◽

Hideyuki Mishima ◽

Chikuma Hamada ◽

Shigetoyo Saji ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colon Cancer ◽

Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Phase Iii Trial ◽

Stage Iii Colon Cancer

3607 Background: The standard treatment duration of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer is 6 months. On the other hand, no clinical trial showed the optimal treatment duration of oral chemotherapeutic agents in adjuvant setting for colon cancer. Sargent et al have reported that 83% of recurrences in stage II and III pts have occurred within the first 3 years after surgery and peak was observed around one year after surgery. Therefore, to clarify the benefit of 12 months administration of Capecitabine, we designed randomized phase III trial for a comparison of 6 months treatment and 12 months treatment of capecitabine as adjuvant CT for stage III colon cancer. Methods: JFMC37 is a multicenter, randomized Phase III trial. Patients with fully resected Stage III colon or recto sigmoid cancer were eligible. Capecitabine was administered orally as tablets, 2,500 mg/m²/day for 14 days followed by a 7-days rest. Treatment is continued to 8 cycles (6 months) in arm A (A) or 16 cycles (12 months) in arm B (B). Patients were randomized 1:1 to A or B. Data size was estimated by disease free survival as primary endpoint. The statistical design is based on superiority hypothesis; 5-yrs DFS is 60% in arm A, 67% in arm B ;unilateral α=0.05, 1-β=0.8;and planed accrual is 1200 pts. Results: Between September 2008 to December 2009, 1304 patients were enrolled and then randomized. Both arms were well balanced for mean age: (A) 64.1, (B) 63.8; ECOG PS (%0/1): (A) 95.0/5.0, (B) 97.1/2.9; involvement of lymph nodes (%N0/N1/N2): (A) 77.1/19.9/3.1, (B) 76.6/19.7/3.7. Treatment completion rate for A and B were 68.2% and 43.4%. Incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) over 1% were neutropenia: (A) 2.6%, (B) 3.8%, diarrhea: (A) 2.9%, (B) 2.1%, loss of appetite: (A) 1.3%, (B) 1.0%, fatigue: (A) 1.8%, (B) 1.2%, hand-hoot syndrome: (A) 16.4%, (B) 22.1%. Conclusions: There were no obvious differences in SAEs between arm A and arm B. Although twelve months of capecitabine showed a tendency to increase G3/4 hand-foot syndrome, we concluded that incidence of SAEs were acceptable and comparable to previously report.

Download Full-text