scholarly journals Randomized, controlled phase III trial comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iii138
Author(s):  
Changming Huang ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Hua-Long Zheng ◽  
Chao-Hui Zheng ◽  
Ping Li
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS254-TPS254
Author(s):  
Rie Makuuchi ◽  
Mitsumi Terada ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Masanori Tokunaga ◽  
Kei Hosoda ◽  
...  

TPS254 Background: Postoperative complications reportedly affect oncological outcomes in various cancers according to the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and by influencing the immune function. Particularly, postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications, including intra-abdominal abscess, pancreatic fistula, and anastomotic leakage, have been identified as prognostic factors for gastric cancer. Given the negative impact of such complications on patient survival, considering the short- and long-term outcomes, it is important to develop surgical procedures with fewer complications. In Japan, laparoscopic gastrectomy is a standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer. Randomized controlled trials have shown that laparoscopic gastrectomy is relatively less invasive and has similar postoperative complications and non-inferior patient survival rates when compared with open gastrectomy. However, several challenges associated with the procedure need to be overcome, such as the limited movement of the forceps. Robot-assisted gastrectomy allows surgeons to perform more meticulous surgical interventions with articulated devices; therefore, reducing the possibility of postoperative complications, as demonstrated by a few prospective studies performed in Japan. However, a non-randomized controlled trial conducted in Korea reported that there were no benefits of robot-assisted gastrectomy in terms of postoperative complications. Furthermore, no randomized controlled trials have directly compared robot-assisted and laparoscopic gastrectomy to provide solid evidence regarding the merits of the former. Methods: To confirm the superiority of robot-assisted gastrectomy over laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with cT1-2N0-2M0 gastric cancer, we designed JCOG1907 (UMIN000039825) as a multicenter randomized phase III trial. In the standard arm, we performed laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, while in the experimental arm, we performed robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications of Clavien–Dindo classification grade ≥II. Major secondary endpoints are relapse-free survival, overall survival, overall postoperative complications, and short-term clinical outcomes after gastrectomy. The planned sample size is 1040 participants, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and a power of 70%, with an expected 3% decrease in postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications (6% vs. 3%). Over the period of 5 years, patients will be enrolled from 35 Japanese institutions. Enrollment has started in March 2020, and as of August 2020, 30 patients have already been enrolled. Clinical trial information: UMIN000039825.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v224
Author(s):  
J. Lu ◽  
H. Chang-Ming ◽  
C. Zheng ◽  
P. Li ◽  
J. Xie ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 1321-1324
Author(s):  
Yuya Sato ◽  
Takanobu Yamada ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa ◽  
Ryunosuke Machida ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Gastrectomy with omentectomy and D2 lymph node dissection is the current standard procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, some retrospective studies have reported that omentectomy increased post-operative abdominal complications but provided no survival advantage over omentum preservation. Therefore, we plan a randomized controlled phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of omentum preservation compared with omentectomy in patients with cT3 (SS) or cT4a (SE) gastric cancer. A total of 1050 patients will be enrolled from 62 institutions over a period of 6.5 years. The primary end point is relapse-free survival, and the secondary end points are overall survival, blood loss, operation time and adverse events. This trial has been registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000036253.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS179-TPS179
Author(s):  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Ji Yeon Park ◽  
Young Woo Kim ◽  
Byung-Ho Nam ◽  
Young Joon Lee ◽  
...  

TPS179 Background: Along with marked increase in early gastric cancer (EGC) in Eastern countries, there has been an effort to adopt sentinel node concept in EGC to reduce immediate postoperative complications and preserve gastric function. Based on the promising results from the previous quality control study prior to phase III trial, this prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial aimed to elucidate the oncologic safety of laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection (SBD) compared to standard laparoscopic gastrectomy. Methods: This trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial with non-inferiority design. Patients diagnosed with a single lesion of clinical stage T1N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma with a diameter of 3cm or less are eligible for the present study. A total of 580 patients (290 per each group) will be randomized to either laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with SBD or standard surgery. The primary end-point is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, quality of life, and 5-year DFS and overall survival. The qualified investigators who completed the prior quality control study are exclusively allowed to participate in this phase III clinical trial. Discussion: The proposed trial is expected to verify whether laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with SBD achieves the similar oncologic outcomes and improved quality of life compared to the standard gastrectomy in EGC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document