Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer

Recently, minimally invasive (endoscopic or laparoscopic) treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) has been widely accepted. However, a standard gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is generally performed in patients with EGC who have no indications for endoscopic resection, and postgastrectomy dysfunction is one of the problems of standard gastrectomy. Function-preserving gastrectomy, such as proximal gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, can be considered when attempting to preserve the patient’s quality of life (QOL) postoperatively. In addition, sentinel node navigation surgery for EGC has been applied in clinical practice in several prospective studies on function-preserving personalized minimized gastrectomy. In the near future, the sentinel lymph node concept is expected to form the basis for establishing an ideal, personalized, minimally invasive function-preserving treatment for patients with EGC, which will improve their postoperative QOL without compromising their long-term survival. In this review article, we summarize the current status, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy for EGC.

What’s New with Endoscopic Treatments for Early Gastric Cancer in the “Post-ESD Era”?

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Endoscopic treatments for gastric cancers have still been progressing even after the great success of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). <b><i>Summary:</i></b> In further advancements of ESD, safe and less-invasive procedures are challenged by managing postoperative bleeding, one of the major adverse events in ESD. Covering the mucosal defect after removal of lesions appears reasonable and effective for preventing delayed bleeding from the post-ESD ulcers. Shielding with biodegradable sheets is attempted on clinical trials, which show equivocal results. Although suturing of the mucosal rims is technically challenging, pilot studies demonstrate favorable outcomes for avoiding post-ESD bleeding even in cases at high risk. In cases after noncurative resection of ESD, the selection of patients who truly require additional gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is important to provide necessary surgery. Risk stratification of lymph node metastases and surgery has been developed, which offers tailor-made management to each patient considering the risks and benefits. In surgery, function-preserving gastrectomy to minimize the resection area in both lymphadenectomy and the primary site is clinically introduced. The sentinel node navigation surgery is promising to realize the minimally invasive gastrectomy, and it should strongly fit ESD as well as laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery or endoscopic full-thickness resection, although nonexposure approaches are desirable. <b><i>Key Message:</i></b> Development for less-invasive managements on gastric cancer will be continued in step with the advancement of endoscopic treatments.

Feasibility of sentinel node navigated surgery in high-risk T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma patients using a hybrid tracer of technetium-99 m and indocyanine green

Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy is standard of care for T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with a high risk of lymph node metastasis. Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is a well-known concept to tailor the extent of lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of SNNS with a hybrid tracer (technetium-99 m/indocyanine green/nanocolloid) for patients with high-risk T1b EAC. Methods In this prospective, multicenter pilot study, 5 patients with high-risk T1b EAC were included. The tracer was injected endoscopically around the endoscopic resection scar the day before surgery, followed by preoperative imaging (lymphoscintigraphy/SPECT-CT). During surgery, first the SNs were localized and resected based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative gammaprobe- and fluorescence-based detection, followed by esophagectomy. Primary endpoints were the percentage of patients with detectable SNs, concordance between preoperative and intraoperative SN detection, and the additive value of indocyanine green. Results SNs could be identified and resected in all patients (median 3 SNs per patient, range 2–7). There was a high concordance between preoperative and intraoperative SN detection. In 2 patients additional peritumoral SNs were identified with fluorescence-based detection. None of the resected lymph nodes showed signs of (micro)metastases and no nodal metastases were detected in the surgical resection specimen. Conclusions SNNS using technetium-99 m/indocyanine green/nanocolloid seems feasible and safe in patients with high-risk T1b EAC. Indocyanine green fluorescence seems to be of additive value for detection of peritumoral SNs. Whether this approach can optimize selection for esophagectomy needs to be studied in future research.

Long-term quality of life and nutritional results after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery versus laparoscopic standard gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: Secondary outcomes of a multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial (SENORITA).

4054 Background: Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) has been suggested as an alternative to laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG) in early gastric cancer patients to improve long-term quality of life (QOL) and nutritional outcomes. Here, we present 3-year results of patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and nutrition, secondary endpoints of SENORITA trial. Methods: SENORITA is a prospective multicenter randomized phase 3 trial. Patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer of 3 cm or less were randomly allocated (1:1) to LSNNS for stomach preservation or LSG. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. In this study, we analyzed QOL assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC stomach module (STO22) and nutritional parameters at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. Linear mixed model analyses was used to evaluate differences between the two groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01804998. Results: From March 2013 to March 2017, a total of 580 patients were randomly assigned and 527 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis population (258 in LSNNS and 269 in LSG group). QOL questionnaires were available for 99.4% of patients at baseline and then for 92.2%, 83.2%, 72.8%, and 66.9% at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, respectively. The LSNNS group had higher physical function score than the LSG group at all time points (p = 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in other scales of EORTC QLQ-C30. Regarding EORTC QLQ-STO22, pain, eating restriction, anxiety, and taste scores were lower (better QOL) at all time points in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group (p = 0.002, < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The summary score of EORTC QLQ-STO22 was also higher in the LSNNS group representing better QOL (p < 0.001). Body mass index, hemoglobin and total protein were significantly higher in the LSNNS group compared with the LSG group. Conclusions: The LSNNS group had better physical function and less symptoms, including pain, eating restriction, anxiety, and taste change compared with the LSG group. Moreover, the nutritional parameters were better maintained in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group. These findings showed benefits of stomach preserving surgery in LSNNS and can be used to help decision making about treatment for patients with early gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998.

Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with prophylactic retrograde transileal conduit ureteral catheter placement after previous total cystectomy: a case report

Background Iatrogenic ureteral injury (UI) is a potentially serious complication of colorectal cancer surgery. Performing perioperative placement of ureteral stents or intraoperative fluorescence navigation surgery for the ureter using indocyanine green (ICG) has been employed as a method of preventing UI. However, transileal conduit stent placement has been considered challenging because it is difficult to identify the ureteral orifice due to the anatomical changes caused by a previous surgery. We report a case in which laparoscopic colectomy was safely performed using a combination of prophylactic transileal conduit ureteral catheter placement and intraoperative ICG fluorescence navigation surgery. Case presentation A 75-year-old man presented to our hospital complaining of vomiting and abdominal distension. He had a history of open total cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion 11 years prior to admission. Computed tomography confirmed colon dilation with fecal impaction from the ascending colon to the sigmoid colon and wall thickening in the sigmoid colon. Colonoscopy during the transanal ileus tube insertion revealed a Borrmann type II tumor with circumferential stenosis 10 cm distal to the junction between the descending colon and the sigmoid colon. The patient was diagnosed with colorectal ileus due to obstructive sigmoid colon cancer and underwent transanal ileus tube insertion. Severe intra-abdominal adhesions were expected due to the previous total cystectomy, and the left ureter was near the sigmoid colon tumor; therefore, prophylactic retrograde transileal conduit ureteral catheter placement was performed one day before the elective surgery. During the operation, 20 ml (5.0 × 10–2 mg/ml) ICG was administered from the transileal conduit ureteral catheter, and ICG fluorescence of the ureter was observed in the retroperitoneum. Laparoscopic Hartmann's operation was successfully performed, confirming ureter fluorescence. The operation time was 231 min, with 5 mL of intraoperative bleeding. The ureteral catheter was removed 3 days after the operation. The patient’s postoperative course was good with no complications, and he was discharged on postoperative day 7. Conclusions Prophylactic transileal conduit ureteral catheter placement and ICG fluorescence navigation surgery were effective in performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery with severe adhesions after urinary diversion.

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF DIGITAL SURGERY IN DENTAL REHABILITATION. LITERATURE REVIEW WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE CLINICAL CASE

Subject. With the advent of advanced imaging technology and CAD/CAM technologies, the possibility of guided surgery has become of wide interest among implantology. The article is devoted to the use of surgical template implantation in the rehabilitation of a dental patient. It provides information about some advantages and disadvantages of the digital protocol in comparison with traditional dental implantation. The main stages of navigation surgery in a clinical case are described. Goal. To evaluate the actual clinical advantages and disadvantages of dental implant placement using a surgical template compared to the traditional treatment protocol. Methodology. The literature search was conducted in scientific search bibliographic databases such as PubMed, eLIBRARY, Medline, and Google Academy. More than 384 studies up to 2014 were found under the thematic headings "Dental implantation" and "Surgical template". During the study of these works, the sample included 56 articles and literature reviews. Conclusions. Recently, implant placement using a surgical template has become a popular treatment method among dental surgeons. The study of modern literature allowed us to formulate the main advantages and disadvantages of this method. Advantages of the method: precise positioning of implants; flap-free surgery reduces the operation time and is characterized by a favorable postoperative course; integration of restoration determinants in surgical planning, which leads to a more aesthetic, functional and predictable result of prosthetics; the possibility of pre-manufacturing a prosthesis based on the planned position of the implant; simplification of the surgical procedure for the dentist. However, this method is not without its drawbacks: the surgeon's inability to visualize anatomical structures; the risk of axis and depth deviation during implant placement; requires additional digital planning.