scholarly journals Prognostic and predictive impact of high tumor mutation burden (TMB) in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v25 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. McNamara ◽  
T. Jacobs ◽  
M. Frizziero ◽  
R. Pihlak ◽  
A. Lamarca ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Zhang Nan ◽  
Wang Guoqing ◽  
Yu Xiaoxu ◽  
Mi Yin ◽  
He Xin ◽  
...  

Background. Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, and the majority of NSCLC patients are diagnosed at the advanced stage. Chemotherapy is still the main treatment at present, and the overall prognosis is poor. In recent years, immunotherapy has developed rapidly. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as the representative have been extensively applied for treating various types of cancers. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) as a potential biomarker is used to screen appropriate patients for treatment of ICIs. To verify the predictive efficacy of TMB, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to explore the association between TMB and ICIs. Method. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and son on were systematically searched from inception to April 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Results. A total of 11 studies consisting of 1525 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were included. Comparison of high and low TMB: pooled HRs for OS, 0.57 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.99; P = 0.046 ); PFS, 0.48 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.69; P < 0.001 ); ORR, 3.15 (95% CI 2.29 to 4.33; P < 0.001 ). Subgroup analysis values: pooled HRs for OS, 0.75 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.92, P = 0.548 ) for blood TMB (bTMB), 0.44 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.75, P = 0.003 ) for tissue TMB (tTMB); for PFS, 0.54 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.98, P = 0.044 ) and 0.43 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.71, P = 0.001 ), respectively. Conclusions. These findings imply that NSCLC patients with high TMB possess significant clinical benefits from ICIs compared to those with low TMB. As opposed to bTMB, tTMB was thought more appropriate for stratifying NSCLC patients for ICI treatment.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Indini ◽  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Gianluca Tomasello ◽  
Erika Rijavec ◽  
Antonio Facciorusso ◽  
...  

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of gastric acid suppressant use on outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and oral chemotherapy. We identified all research evaluating the effect of GAS (gastric acid suppressants) use on patients receiving oral chemotherapy or TKIs for solid tumors. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with a fixed-effects or a random effects model. The study population included n = 16 retrospective studies and 372,418 patients. The series concerned gastrointestinal tract tumors (n = 5 studies), renal cell carcinomas (RCC, n = 3 studies), non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC, n = 5 studies), and soft tissue sarcomas or mixed histologies solid tumors in n = 3 studies. The pooled HRs for OS and PFS were 1.31 (95%CI: 1.20–1.43; p < 0.01) and 1.3 (95%CI 1.07–1.57; p < 0.01) for GAS and no GAS users, respectively. Only studies of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutated NSCLC patients receiving TKIs and those with colorectal cancer receiving oral chemotherapy showed a significant correlation between GAS and poor survival. Our study supports the evidence of a possible negative impact of concomitant GAS therapy on survival outcomes of patients receiving oral anti-cancer drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document