scholarly journals SUNitinib with EVOfosfamide (TH-302) for G1/G2 metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) naïve for systemic treatment. The SUNEVO phase II trial of the Spanish task force group for neuroendocrine and endocrine tumours (GETNE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v566
Author(s):  
E. Grande ◽  
C. Lopez ◽  
T. Alonso Gordoa ◽  
M. Benavent ◽  
J. Capdevila ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 5 ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamdy Azim ◽  
Ashraf Omar ◽  
Hesham Atef ◽  
Heba Zawahry ◽  
Mohamed K Shaker ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1988
Author(s):  
Vera G. Megdanova-Chipeva ◽  
Angela Lamarca ◽  
Alison Backen ◽  
Mairéad G. McNamara ◽  
Jorge Barriuso ◽  
...  

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) are rare diseases and a good example of how research is not only feasible, but also of crucial importance in the scenario of rare tumours. Many clinical trials have been performed over the past two decades expanding therapeutic options for patients with advanced PanNETs. Adequate management relies on optimal selection of treatment, which may be challenging for clinicians due to the fact that multiple options of therapy are currently available. A number of therapies already exist, which are supported by data from phase III studies, including somatostatin analogues and targeted therapies (sunitinib and everolimus). In addition, chemotherapy remains an option, with temozolomide and capecitabine being one of the most popular doublets to use. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy was successfully implemented in patients with well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, but with certain questions waiting to be solved for the management of PanNETs. Finally, the role of immunotherapy is still poorly understood. In this review, the data supporting current systemic treatment options for locally advanced or metastatic PanNETs are summarized. Strategies for treatment selection in patients with PanNETs based on patient, disease, or drug characteristics is provided, as well as a summary of current evidence on prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Future perspectives are discussed, focusing on current and forthcoming challenges and unmet needs of patients with these rare tumours.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (22) ◽  
pp. 3623-3628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Bottini ◽  
Daniele Generali ◽  
Maria Pia Brizzi ◽  
Stephen B. Fox ◽  
Alessandra Bersiga ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate the activity of letrozole plus/minus oral metronomic cyclophophamide as primary systemic treatment (PST) in elderly breast cancer patients. Methods One hundred fourteen consecutive elderly women with T2-4 N0-1 and estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to primary letrozole therapy (2.5 mg daily for 6 months) or a combination of letrozole plus oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg/daily for 6 months) in an open-labeled, randomized phase II trial. Tumor response was assessed clinically, and tumor Ki67 index and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A levels were measured before and after treatment. Results Overall response rate was 71.9% (95% CI, 60.0 to 83.8) in the 57 patients randomly assigned to receive primary letrozole and 87.7% (95% CI, 78.6 to 96.2) in the 57 patients randomly assigned to receive letrozole plus cyclophosphamide. The difference in activity between treatment arms was predominantly confined to patients with ductal histology. There was a significantly greater suppression of Ki67 and VEGF-A expression in the letrozole/cyclophosphamide-treated group than in the letrozole-treated group, leading to lower Ki67 and VEGF expression at post-treatment residual histology (P = .03 and P = .002, respectively). Conclusion Both letrozole and letrozole plus cyclophosphamide treatments appeared active as PST in elderly breast cancer patients. Metronomic scheduling of cyclophosphamide may have an antiangiogenetic effect and the combination of letrozole plus cyclophosphamide warrants testing in a randomized phase III trial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document