scholarly journals CheckMate 459: A randomized, multi-center phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v874-v875 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Yau ◽  
J.W. Park ◽  
R.S. Finn ◽  
A.-L. Cheng ◽  
P. Mathurin ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077
Author(s):  
Yan Sun ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Yabing Guo ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
...  

4077 Background: Many advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) patients (pts) are often with more complicated clinical conditions such as damaged liver or blood function, poor physical conditions. Those aHCC pts are not suitable for molecular target drug like sorafenib or systemic chemotherapy and no standard or generally accepted treatment. Icaritin, a single molecule ( > 98% purity) derived from Epimedii herba (Traditional Chinese herbal medicine), is a novel immune-modulation anti-tumor agent. Preclinical studies demonstrated that Icaritin induced anti-HCC activities through targeting IL-6/JAK//STAT3 pathways and modulating inflammation-immune systems including Th1 cytokines, and down-regulation of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Prior phase II study demonstrated favorable overall survival (OS) improvement in aHCC pts with poor conditions and correlated with the combined serum biomarkers. The current phase III study was designed to confirm above clinical benefits and safety of Icaritin in those patients. Methods: An adaptive enrichment design was used in a multicenter randomized, double-blinded study of comparing Icaritin with Huachashu (a TCM formula commonly used in China) as first line therapy for those aHCC pts (NCT03236636). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free-survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The pts were randomized (1:1) to receive either Icaritin at 600mg or Huachashu. Based on prior studies, a composite biomarker score (CBS) of AFP(≥400 ng/mL), TNF-a( < 2.5 pg/mL) and IFN-g(≥7.0 pg/mL) was used for pts selection and a CBS score of 2/3 was predefined positive. Patients with CBS-positive were applied in interim analysis according to the protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP). Results: A total of 283 aHCC pts were enrolled and randomized from Sept. 2017, and 71 enriched pts was CBS-positive with combined risk/poor prognosis factors such as BCLC stage C, HBV infection, and thrombocytopenia etc.. Thirty-three and 38 CBS-positive aHCC pts were treated with Icaritin or Huachashu, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.1 mo (cutoff date, Dec.30,2020), the treatment outcomes for Icaritin and Huachashu arm showed following, that is mOS, 13.54 vs. 7.06 mo (HR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.0046), mTTP, 3.65 vs. 1.84 mo (HR = 0.67, 95%CI, 0.36-1.22), mPFS, 2.79 vs. 1.84 mo (HR = 0.75, 95%CI, 0.43-1.33), and DCR, 48.5% vs. 26.3, respectively. Treatment-related adverse event (AE≥3 grades) observed were 15.2% vs. 31.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Small molecule immunomodulation agent Icaritin could significantly improve the overall survival with favorable safety in a prospectively CBS-enriched HBV-related advanced HCC pts with poor conditions. Clinical trial information: NCT03236636.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (21) ◽  
pp. 1525-1536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Kate Kelley ◽  
Jennifer W Oliver ◽  
Saswati Hazra ◽  
Fawzi Benzaghou ◽  
Thomas Yau ◽  
...  

Cabozantinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR, MET and the TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MER) family of kinase receptors. In addition to their role in tumor growth and angiogenesis, cabozantinib targets promote an immune-suppressive microenvironment. Cabozantinib is approved as single-agent therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received prior sorafenib. Owing to its antitumor and immunomodulatory properties, cabozantinib is being developed in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early studies of these combinations have shown promising antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with solid tumors. Here, we describe the rationale and design of COSMIC-312, a Phase III study evaluating the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) versus sorafenib for treatment-naive patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ClinicalTrial.gov Registration: NCT03755791


Liver Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaekyung Cheon ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
Yeonghak Bang ◽  
Neung Hwa Park ◽  
Jung Woo Shin ◽  
...  

Introduction/Objective: Lenvatinib demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the randomized phase III REFLECT trial. Considering the discrepancies in patients between clinical trial data and daily practice, an account of practical experience is needed. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in which 3 tertiary referral centers participated. A total of 92 patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib between September 2018 and January 2020 were analyzed. Results: Lenvatinib was used as the first-line therapy for 67 (72.8%) patients, and for 25 (27.2%) patients previously treated with other systemic therapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors. At the time of initiation of lenvatinib, 74 (80.4%) and 18 (19.6%) patients were classified as Child-Pugh A and B, respectively. Thirty-five patients (38.0%) had extensive disease that would have excluded them from the REFLECT trial. In the Child-Pugh A group, the response rate graded according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 was 21.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1–6.1) months, and overall survival (OS) was 10.7 (95% CI 4.8–16.5) months for patients treated with first-line lenvatinib (n = 57). With second- or later-line lenvatinib (n = 17), median PFS and OS were 4.1 (95% CI 3.1–5.1) and 6.4 (95% CI 5.1–7.7) months, respectively. In the Child-Pugh B group (n = 18), median PFS and OS were 2.6 (95% CI 0.6–4.6) and 5.3 (95% CI 2.0–8.5) months, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were hyperbilirubinemia (n = 8; 8.7%), AST elevation (n = 6; 6.5%), and diarrhea (n = 5; 5.4%) across all study patients. Conclusions: In this real-world study, lenvatinib was found to be well tolerated and effective in more heterogeneous HCC patient populations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (S3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Weinmann ◽  
P.R. Galle

 The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib was the only approved systemic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc) for about a decade. In recent years, the number of approved agents has increased significantly as a result of a number of positive phase iii clinical trials. Lenvatinib as a first-line treatment, and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab in the second-line setting are now approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (fda) and the European Medicines Agency. In phase ii studies, immunotherapy with nivolumab and monotherapy using pembrolizumab yielded impressive results for overall survival in therapy-naïve and pretreated patients, leading to the accelerated approval by the fda of nivolumab and pembrolizumab for second-line treatment. However, phase iii trials of nivolumab in the first line and pembrolizumab in the second line as single agents failed to reach statistical significance, although clinical benefit for a subset of patients with long durations of response could be demonstrated. Despite that setback, immunotherapy for hcc is a promising therapeutic approach, and the combination of immunotherapy with other treatment modal­ities such as monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or local therapies has the potential to increase the overall response rate and survival. Recently, the results of a phase iii trial of combination atezolizumab–bevacizumab compared with sorafenib showed a highly significant survival benefit and median overall survival that was not reached in the immunotherapy arm, making the combination the preferred standard of care in first-line therapy. Despite the impressive results and generally good toxicity profile of immunotherapy, patients who respond to therapy constitute only a subset of the overall population, and response rates are still limited. This review focuses on the currently reported results and ongoing clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitor–based immunotherapy in hcc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document