scholarly journals Cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab versus sorafenib in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: COSMIC-312 Phase III study design

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (21) ◽  
pp. 1525-1536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Kate Kelley ◽  
Jennifer W Oliver ◽  
Saswati Hazra ◽  
Fawzi Benzaghou ◽  
Thomas Yau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Single Agent Therapy ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Immunomodulatory Properties

Cabozantinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR, MET and the TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MER) family of kinase receptors. In addition to their role in tumor growth and angiogenesis, cabozantinib targets promote an immune-suppressive microenvironment. Cabozantinib is approved as single-agent therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received prior sorafenib. Owing to its antitumor and immunomodulatory properties, cabozantinib is being developed in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early studies of these combinations have shown promising antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with solid tumors. Here, we describe the rationale and design of COSMIC-312, a Phase III study evaluating the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) versus sorafenib for treatment-naive patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ClinicalTrial.gov Registration: NCT03755791

The use of cabozantinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Hong Kong multi-center experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 316-316
Author(s):  
Yawen Dong ◽  
Thomas Wai-Tong Leung ◽  
Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc

316 Background: In the phase III CELESTIAL trial, cabozantinib showed significant improvement in overall survival with good tolerability in advanced HCC population. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, survival and tolerability of cabozatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in a real life setting. Methods: Between February 2018 and October 2019, consecutive advanced HCC patients who received cabozatinib alone or in combination at University of Hong Kong Health System hospitals were analysed. Cabozantinib was administered at 60 mg continuously daily. Objective response rate (ORR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and tolerability were evaluated. Results: Overall, 22 patients were included. The median age was 57.1 years (range 48.5-58.6). All patients except one were hepatitis B carriers. More than 80% of the patients had underlying Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. Most patients had metastatic disease (95.5%). More than 70% of patients received cabozantinib beyond second-line, and most of the patients had prior exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and/or immunotherapy. The median time from the start of first-line systemic treatment to the start of cabozantinib was 11.2 months. Cabozantinib was administered to 11 patients (50%) as single agent, while the other half received cabozantinib in combination with mostly immune checkpoint inhibitors. The median follow-up was 7.6 months. The table below shows the ORR. The overall median TTP and OS were 4.2 and 8.90 months, respectively. Interestingly, among those who received single agent cabozantinib, the median OS was 5.36 months in contrast to 12.32 months in the patients received combination. Overall, 90.9% of patients experienced treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) with transient liver function occurred in nearly 50% patients. Nevertheless, Grade 3/4 TRAEs was only 12%. Conclusions: Our present study showed that the use of cabozatinib in advanced HCC patients had good anti-tumour activity and survival benefits with acceptable toxicity profile. [Table: see text]

Atezolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: good things come to those who wait

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Angela Dalia Ricci ◽  
Giovanni Brandi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Medical Community ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Novel Treatments ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Impact

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients present poor prognosis. However, recent years have seen the advent of several novel treatments in this setting, where the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been investigated. Among these, the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab has reported unprecedented results in treatment-naive patients with unresectable disease, with the recently published IMbrave150 Phase III trial showing the superiority of the combination over sorafenib monotherapy, and after having attended more than a decade of ‘stagnation’, the HCC medical community has a new standard of care. Herein, we examine the development and the impact of atezolizumab in advanced HCC, summarizing the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and recent evidence from Phase I to III clinical trials.

scholarly journals Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Korean Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Liver Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaekyung Cheon ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
Yeonghak Bang ◽  
Neung Hwa Park ◽  
Jung Woo Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Real World ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line

Introduction/Objective: Lenvatinib demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the randomized phase III REFLECT trial. Considering the discrepancies in patients between clinical trial data and daily practice, an account of practical experience is needed. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in which 3 tertiary referral centers participated. A total of 92 patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib between September 2018 and January 2020 were analyzed. Results: Lenvatinib was used as the first-line therapy for 67 (72.8%) patients, and for 25 (27.2%) patients previously treated with other systemic therapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors. At the time of initiation of lenvatinib, 74 (80.4%) and 18 (19.6%) patients were classified as Child-Pugh A and B, respectively. Thirty-five patients (38.0%) had extensive disease that would have excluded them from the REFLECT trial. In the Child-Pugh A group, the response rate graded according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 was 21.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1–6.1) months, and overall survival (OS) was 10.7 (95% CI 4.8–16.5) months for patients treated with first-line lenvatinib (n = 57). With second- or later-line lenvatinib (n = 17), median PFS and OS were 4.1 (95% CI 3.1–5.1) and 6.4 (95% CI 5.1–7.7) months, respectively. In the Child-Pugh B group (n = 18), median PFS and OS were 2.6 (95% CI 0.6–4.6) and 5.3 (95% CI 2.0–8.5) months, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were hyperbilirubinemia (n = 8; 8.7%), AST elevation (n = 6; 6.5%), and diarrhea (n = 5; 5.4%) across all study patients. Conclusions: In this real-world study, lenvatinib was found to be well tolerated and effective in more heterogeneous HCC patient populations.

scholarly journals Clinical Benefits of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Predictive Value of Tumor Mutation Burden in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxi Zheng ◽  
◽  
Haihua Yang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Mutation Burden ◽  
Mutation Burden

Review question / Objective: Is immunotherapy associated with beneficial clinical outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and how can combination immunotherapy be deployed to produce the best benefit? Is tumor mutation burden (TMB) a predictive biomarker for immune‐checkpoint inhibitors? Condition being studied: To this date, about 50 single-arm clinical trials and several randomized control trials (RCTs) presented final or interim results of investigations on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced HCC. In the CheckMate 459, IMbrave 050, and ORIENT-32, immunotherapies were found to significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with sorafenib (a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, as standard systemic treatment) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, these clinical trials were different on clinical phases, sample size, and response evaluation criteria, and inconsistent clinical outcomes were shown in several trials.

scholarly journals Genetic Heterogeneity, Therapeutic Hurdle Confronting Sorafenib and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4343
Author(s):  
Sara M. Atwa ◽  
Margarete Odenthal ◽  
Hend M. El Tayebi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
Treatment Modalities

Despite the latest advances in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening and treatment modalities, HCC is still representing a global burden. Most HCC patients present at later stages to an extent that conventional curative options are ineffective. Hence, systemic therapy represented by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, in the first-line setting is the main treatment modality for advanced-stage HCC. However, in the two groundbreaking phase III clinical trials, the SHARP and Asia-Pacific trials, sorafenib has demonstrated a modest prolongation of overall survival in almost 30% of HCC patients. As HCC develops in an immune-rich milieu, particular attention has been placed on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a novel therapeutic modality for HCC. Yet, HCC therapy is hampered by the resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and the subsequent tumor recurrence. HCC is characterized by substantial genomic heterogeneity that has an impact on cellular response to the applied therapy. And hence, this review aims at giving an insight into the therapeutic impact and the different mechanisms of resistance to sorafenib and ICIs as well as, discussing the genomic heterogeneity associated with such mechanisms.

scholarly journals Scientific Rationale for Combined Immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies and VEGF Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Vegf Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Immunosuppressive Microenvironment

A successful phase III trial for the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (the IMbrave150 trial) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma has recently been reported. This is groundbreaking because nivolumab and pembrolizumab, both programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies, have failed to show efficacy as first- and second-line therapeutics, respectively, in phase III clinical trials. Immunotherapy with a combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab resulted in better survival than treatment with sorafenib for the first time since sorafenib was approved in 2007. The high efficacy of the combination of PD-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies is not only due to their additive effects on tumor growth, but also to their reprogramming of the immunosuppressive microenvironment into an immunostimulatory microenvironment. These results were confirmed in a phase Ib trial that showed significantly longer progression-free survival in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group than in patients that received atezolizumab alone. These results demonstrate that immunotherapy with a combination of PD-1/PD-L1 and VEGF inhibitors is effective and may result in a reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. The results of an ongoing phase III trial of a PD-1 antibody in combination with the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are highly anticipated.

scholarly journals Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: from sorafenib to combination therapies

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. HEP20
Author(s):  
Christoph Roderburg ◽  
Burcin Özdirik ◽  
Alexander Wree ◽  
Münevver Demir ◽  
Frank Tacke
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Current Standard

For almost a decade, systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was limited to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib. Different agents including checkpoint inhibitors, TKIs and anti-VEGFR antibodies demonstrated efficacy in treatment. For the first time, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, a first-line treatment that is superior to the current standard was identified, potentially changing the way we treat HCC. In this review, we summarize current data on systemic treatment of patients with advanced HCC, focusing on combination therapies comprising immune checkpoint inhibitors, TKIs and locoregional therapies. We elucidate findings from recent trials and discuss such challenges as the lack of predictive biomarkers for identification of subgroups that will benefit from novel treatment strategies.

Weekly paclitaxel combined with monthly carboplatin versus single-agent therapy in patients age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 randomized phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Quoix ◽  
J. Oster ◽  
V. Westeel ◽  
E. Pichon ◽  
G. Zalcman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Single Agent Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Iii Study

2 Background: Incidence of advanced NSCLC in the elderly is increasing. Specific trials for elderly are seldom and those patients are not optimally treated. Current recommendations are monotherapies with gemcitabine or vinorelbine. Methods: French multicentric randomized phase III study in pts aged 70 to 89, PS 0-2 with advanced NSCLC not irradiable, comparing a 3-weekly single agent therapy (gemcitabine 1,150 mg/m2 or vinorelbine 30 mg/m2, d1, d8: arm A) with carboplatin AUC 6 every 4 weeks + paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (d1,8,15) doublet (arm B). Five cycles of single agent and 4 cycles of the doublet were to be given. Second-line in case of toxicity or progressive disease was fixed with erlotinib 150 mg/d. The main endpoint was overall survival. Results: 451 pts were included from 04/2005 to 12/2009 by 60 centers. Males were 73.8%, median age was 77.2 years (range 70-89). PS was 0-1 in 73.6%. The 2 arms were well-balanced for pts characteristics. At time of second planned intermediate analysis (after two-third of expected deaths, i.e. 224), 451 pts were randomized, out of the 522 initially planned. The steering committee advice was to stop the inclusions. Overall survival of the 313 pts analysed at this time was significantly longer in arm B (median: 10.4 months, 95%CI: [8.2; 15.0] vs. 6.2 months, 95%CI: [5.3; 7.5] for arm A, (HR = 0.60, 95%CI : [0.46; 0.78], p = 0.0001). Median PFS was 6.3 months, 95%CI: [5.5; 6.9] in arm B vs. 3.2 months, 95%CI: [0.44; 0.70] (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: [0.44; 0.70], p < 0.0001). Grade 3-4 haematological toxicities were significantly more frequent in arm B (17.9% vs. 54.1%). No significant difference was observed in early deaths (arm A: 23.7%, arm B: 16.6%). Survival, response and toxicity data for the whole series of 451 pts will be updated at time of the meeting. Conclusions: Paclitaxel and carboplatin doublet provides a significantly longer survival in elderly pts with advanced NSCLC than current standard single agent therapy, with acceptable toxicity, making it a new treatment paradigm for PS 0-2 pts ≥ 70 years. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document