scholarly journals Erratum to: Lexical Access in L1 Attrition—Competition versus Frequency: A Comparison of Turkish and Moroccan Attriters in the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika S Schmid ◽  
Gülsen Yilmaz
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Lexical Access ◽  
L1 Attrition

scholarly journals Testing for Nonselective Bilingual Lexical Access Using L1 Attrited Bilinguals

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
He Pu ◽  
Yazmin E. Medina ◽  
Phillip J. Holcomb ◽  
Katherine J. Midgley
Keyword(s):  
Lexical Access ◽  
First Language ◽  
Judgment Task ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
N400 Effect ◽  
The Past ◽  
L2 Processing ◽  
L1 Attrition ◽  
Semantic Judgment ◽  
Selective Processing

Research in the past few decades generally supported a nonselective view of bilingual lexical access, where a bilingual’s two languages are both active during monolingual processing. However, recent work by Costa et al. (2017) brought this into question by reinterpreting evidence for nonselectivity in a selective manner. We manipulated the factor of first language (L1) attrition in an event-related potential (ERP) experiment to disentangle Costa and colleagues’ selective processing proposal versus the traditional nonselective processing view of bilingual lexical access. Spanish–English bilinguals demonstrated an N400 effect of L1 attrition during implicit L1 processing in a second language (L2) semantic judgment task, indicating the contribution of variable L1 lexical access during L2 processing. These results are incompatible with Costa and colleagues’ selective model, adding to the literature supporting a nonselective view of bilingual lexical access.

Psychology in The Netherlands

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter van Drunen ◽  
Pieter J. van Strien
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands

Lexical Access Problems Lead to Disfluencies in Speech

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hartsuiker ◽  
Lies Notebaert
Keyword(s):  
Lexical Access ◽  
Picture Naming ◽  
Language Production ◽  
Line Drawings ◽  
Name Agreement ◽  
Access Problems ◽  
Agreement Condition

A picture naming experiment in Dutch tested whether disfluencies in speech can arise from difficulties in lexical access. Speakers described networks consisting of line drawings and paths connecting these drawings, and we manipulated picture name agreement. Consistent with our hypothesis, there were more pauses and more self-corrections in the low name agreement condition than the high name agreement condition, but there was no effect on repetitions. We also considered determiner frequency. There were more self-corrections and more repetitions when the picture name required the less frequent (neuter-gender) determiner “het” than the more frequent (common-gender) determiner “de”. These data suggest that difficulties in distinct stages of language production result in distinct patterns of disfluencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document