Resonance may be detonation mechanism for supernovae

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 6.8.1-6.8
Keyword(s):  
1983 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. É. Annikov ◽  
B. N. Kondrikov ◽  
N. N. Korneeva ◽  
S. N. Puzyrev
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 650-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Nifad'ev ◽  
N. M. Kalinina

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 716-724
Author(s):  
I. A. Spirin ◽  
D. A. Pronin ◽  
E. S. Mitin ◽  
V. G. Simakov ◽  
V. A. Bragunets ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 818-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Adreev ◽  
L. A. Luk'yanchikov

1965 ◽  
Vol 5 (02) ◽  
pp. 153-159
Author(s):  
L.H. Robinson

Abstract TEST TEST A proposed method of drilling utilizes sequential detonation of two types of explosive charges delivered to the hole by a conventional drilling fluid through pipe. A shaped charge first produces a long thin hole. A second charge, called a gauging charge, is pumped into the thin hole, explodes, and enlarges it to full gauge. In one suggested configuration, the explosives are contained in cylindrical capsules 4- to 5-ft long. A drilling head is positioned 2- to 3-ft off bottom. When a capsule is pumped to the bottom of the hole and stops, pressure inside the drill pipe increases and differential pressure detonates the explosive. Primacord along the length of the capsule disintegrates the capsule. The debris circulates out of the hole with the drilling fluid. The gauging-charge action was examined using 2-ft cubes of Berea sandstone. The sandstone (18 per cent porosity) was vacuum-saturated with water and surrounded by concrete. To prevent reflected tensile pulses, the acoustical impedance of the concrete matched that of the sandstone. A 750-psig pressure was applied to a drilling fluid within a shaped-charge-formed hole before detonating the gauging charge. In these tests, 190 gm of rock were removed for each gram of explosive detonated. A similar series of experiments on low-porosity (0.40 per cent) metamorphic limestone provided a more rigorous test. Extensive fracturing from the gauging-charge action prevented an estimate of the volume of the expanded hole. The diameter of the hole was irregular, ranging from about 2 to 4 in-, or about fivefold larger than the hole created by the shaped charge. INTRODUCTION In the past, explosives have found a varied but somewhat limited use in the oil field. An early well stimulation technique, still in use today, involves shooting nitroglycerin to enlarge the borehole and to increase matrix permeability near the wellbore. Bullets and jets are now the conventional method of perforating casing and tubing. Detonations are frequently used to "back off" or "shoot off" stuck pipe and, of course, seismographic work has long depended on explosive-generated pulses to find attractive earth structures. Efforts to use explosives in drilling operations have received limited examinations1 which, in one respect, is surprising because explosives offer one way to transmit large amounts of energy directly to the bottom of the hole. Recently, Ostrovskii1 described a Russian method of drilling with explosives that utilizes small capsules containing explosives which are pumped into the mud stream to the bottom of a borehole. As the capsules leave the end of the drill pipe, a detonation mechanism is armed. Impact detonates the explosive- In another configuration, two liquids (an oxidizing agent and fuel) in the capsule are separated by a frangible membrane. Separately, the liquids are nonexplosive. Near the bottom of the drill pipe, the capsule passes through a narrow constriction which ruptures the membrane. The mixing of the liquids produces an explosive. Impact is again used to detonate the explosive. About the time Ostrovskii was developing his method, Humble Oil & Refining Co. was independently doing research on another explosive drilling concept based on the sequential detonation of two types of explosive charges. The proposed technique consisted of alternately pumping a shaped charge and then a "gauging charge" down a well. The shaped charge should drill a long, tapered hole, and the gauging charge should expand it to full gauge. This paper presents the visualized drilling concept and gives results of laboratory work which showed that sequential firing of charges can form hole at an attractive charge-to-rock removal ratio. An important finding was that increased environmental pressure, which is to be expected in wells, increases rock removal efficiency of the gauging charge.


The sensitiveness of the following initiators has been compared when used loose, and when compressed up to 2300 kg./cm. Crystalline Service azide (crystals 75 X 10-4 cm.). Powdered Service azide (fragments 1 to 25 x 10~4 cm.). Dextrinated lead azide. Mercury fulminate. Sensitiveness to heat was measured by determining the induction period at various temperatures, and also by evaluating threshold temperatures below which no detonation was observed for various masses of initiators. Tests were also made to see how far the action of flame, and of percussion, could be correlated with the action of heat on these initiators. Compression reduces the induction period in all cases, but the values of E and B (see text) are differently affected in the case of different initiators. Compression also lowers the threshold temperature below which a given mass of initiator will not detonate. Thus in all cases sensitiveness to heat is increased by compression. On the other hand, compression lessens the sensitiveness of mercury fulminate to flash and percussion, corresponding with the well-known phenomenon of ‘dead-pressing’. If anything, compression increases the sensitiveness of lead azide to flash and percussion. A new detonation mechanism has been observed for both service and dextrinated lead azides. The experimental results throw further light on the build-up of the detonation wave in explosives. When the volume of explosive ‘primarily’ involved in the sensitiveness phenomenon is small, as is usually the case for initiators, the mechanism of build-up differs from the ‘self-heating’ mechanism which may overtake it with larger volumes of explosive. A simple explanation is suggested for the ‘dead-pressing’ of explosives, which is to be expected when ‘self-heating’ is the mechanism controlling the build-up of detonation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 523-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. HORVATH

We discuss the propagation of the hypothetical "combustion" n → SQM in a dense stellar environment. We address the instabilities affecting the flame and a present new results of application to the turbulent regime. The acceleration of the flame, the possible transition to the distributed regime and a further deflagration-to-detonation mechanism are addressed. As a general result, we conclude that the burning happens in (at least) either the turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor or the distributed regime, but not in the laminar regime. In both cases the velocity of the conversion of the star is several orders of magnitude larger than u lam , making the latter irrelevant in practice for this problem. A transition to a detonation is by no means excluded; actually, it seems to be favored by the physical setting, but a definitive answer would need a full numerical simulation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 949-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-gen Shi ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Lin-sheng Zhao ◽  
Hong-bao Hou ◽  
Yu-heng Ge

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document