scholarly journals 531 An Admission Proforma to Improve Clerking Documentation in the ENT Department During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Full Cycle Audit

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Brown ◽  
C Ashton ◽  
A Poulios

Abstract Aim Good Surgical Practice states that surgeons must ensure that accurate, comprehensive, legible and contemporaneous records are maintained for all their interactions with patients. It is therefore critical that the clerking document, as the initial record of an admission, meets this standard. During the Covid-19 pandemic, an emergency rota meant that cross-covering of ENT at junior level was increasingly required in our hospital. Understandably, these trainees were less familiar with admitting ENT patients and of departmental standards. Our aim was to evaluate the quality of clerking documentation in our department during this period and investigate whether a standardised admission proforma could improve this. Method Clerking documents for all patients admitted in April 2020 were checked for completion of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment and inclusion of ten key pieces of information as outlined by the Surgical Tool for Auditing Records score. As was standard at this time, all clerking documentation had been completed on blank hospital continuation paper. A departmental admission proforma was introduced before admissions in June 2020 were then assessed identically. Results Improvement was noted in all measured parameters with no adverse effects. There was particular improvement in documentation of referral source (28% to 97%), consultant in charge (35% to 90%), name/grade/bleep (25% to 94%) and VTE risk assessment (14% to 78%). Trainee response was positive. Conclusions A simple admission proforma can markedly improve the standard of clerking documentation and therefore increase patient safety during a turbulent time. We would encourage other departments to consider developing their own.

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e487-e494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E.G. Warren ◽  
Miranda B. Kim ◽  
Neil E. Martin ◽  
Helen A. Shih

Purpose: Patient care within radiation oncology extends beyond the clinic or treatment hours. The on-call radiation oncologist is often not a patient’s primary radiation oncologist, introducing the possibility of communication breakdowns and medical errors. This study analyzed after-hours telephone calls to identify opportunities for improved patient safety and quality of care. Methods and Materials: Patient calls received outside of business hours between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, at two academic radiation oncology departments were retrospectively reviewed. All calls were analyzed using content analysis, and descriptive analyses were performed. Results: During this time, 5,557 courses of radiotherapy (RT) were delivered. A total of 454 calls were received from 369 unique patients (81%), averaging 4.4 calls per week per department. Phone encounters were documented for 223 calls (49%). The calls were categorized by disease site (No., %): central nervous system (91, 20%), head and neck (78, 17%), genitourinary (53, 12%), GI (52, 12%), thoracic (51, 11%), gynecologic (30, 7%), breast (24, 5%), and other (75, 17%). Patients most often called regarding acute medical, non–RT-related issues (144 calls, 32%); acute RT-related adverse effects (127, 28%); and medication management, including refills (63, 14%). Conclusion: This analysis provided novel information regarding the volume of and reasons for after-hours patient-initiated telephone calls. It identified opportunities for actionable improvements in safety and quality of care, particularly with regard to documentation by on-call providers, communication with the primary radiation oncology and extended health care teams, patient education about common RT adverse effects, and medication management.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. A535
Author(s):  
A.G. Bateman ◽  
R. Sheaff ◽  
S. Child ◽  
O. Boiko ◽  
O. Ukoumunne ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Nicole Held ◽  
Benjamin Jung ◽  
Lori Sommervold ◽  
Siddhartha Singh ◽  
Lisa Baumann Kreuziger

BACKGROUND: Patient safety indicators (PSI) were developed for hospitals to screen for healthcare-associated adverse events. PSIs are believed to be preventable and have become a part of major pay-for-performance programs. PSI-12 captures perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), which contributes to morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients. We aimed to evaluate PSI-12 events at our institution to identify areas for improvement of perioperative VTE prevention. METHODS: We identified PSI-12 events from June 2015 to June 2017 using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality software version 5. Events were reviewed using our electronic medical record to identify further details of each event. RESULTS: A total of 154 perioperative VTE cases were analyzed in the 2-year period. Pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in 62.9% of cases, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in 24%, and concurrent DVT/PE in 12.9%. The mean age of patients was 56 years old. Deficiencies in guideline-appropriate prophylaxis were identified in only 17 (11%) of cases. Unfractionated heparin was used in 61 cases, enoxaparin in 31 cases, and nine events occurred on therapeutic anticoagulation. Mechanical prophylaxis was used in 51 cases because of bleeding risk, thrombocytopenia, and/or liver associated coagulopathy. Four events occurred prior to the index procedure, with another eight cases occurring intraoperatively, or on the day of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: PSI-12 has several limitations in identifying quality of care issues in perioperative VTE. While it may be useful as a screening tool, further research for improvements are needed if it will remain one of the key measures in pay-for-performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Bui ◽  
Mareli Coetzer ◽  
Katie J. Schenning ◽  
Avital Y. O’Glasser

AbstractThe preoperative evaluation and risk assessment has always been a critical aspect of safe surgical practice, and in the midst of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it has become even more crucial to patient safety. Emerging data show that surgical procedures in patients who test positive for coronavirus disease (COVID) are associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased postoperative complications and mortality. In addition to personal protective equipment (PPE) management, isolation protocols, preoperative SARS-CoV-2 screening, and steps to ensure clinician safety, determining how to deem patients who have recovered from COVID-19 safe to proceed is an added challenge. We present a preoperative protocol for evaluation of previously COVID-positive patients for elective surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e000885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haytham Taha ◽  
Ezhil Govindraj ◽  
Filestin Jaber ◽  
Ghadah Shehadeh ◽  
Bernadette Kelly ◽  
...  

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients. Mafraq Hospital, a 450-bed tertiary-level hospital in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, has identified VTE prevention as a critical patient safety measure and VTE prophylaxis as a key performance indicator (KPI). Mafraq Hospital VTE prevention policy states that all admitted adult patients 18 years and above should receive a VTE risk assessment, and all patients identified at risk of VTE with no contraindications should receive appropriate VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission. In a move towards safer practices, our governing body, Abu Dhabi Health Services SEHA, has raised the VTE prophylaxis KPI target from 85% to 95% for all admitted adult patients within 24 hours of admission. Our average VTE prophylaxis rate was 87%, and achieving this new target was a challenge. We conducted this study on Mafraq Hospital Medical and Surgical wards. The study period was 12 months, from July 2018 to June 2019, and a total of 5475 patients were evaluated. Our aim was to improve VTE prophylaxis rates in order to ensure patient safety and reduce preventable harm. We used Caprini Model electronic VTE risk assessment computerised decision support tool to help identify VTE risk. A multidisciplinary task force team was formed and led this quality improvement project. The purpose of this publication was to indicate the quality improvement interventions implemented to enhance compliance with VTE prophylaxis using integrated critical thinking and health informatics and the outcomes of those interventions. Through implementing critical thinking and health informatics interventions, our VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission rates improved from an average 87% in July 2018 to above 98%, and this improvement was sustained over the last 3 months of the study period April through June 2019.


2010 ◽  
Vol 151 (34) ◽  
pp. 1365-1374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Dávid ◽  
Hajna Losonczy ◽  
Miklós Udvardy ◽  
Zoltán Boda ◽  
György Blaskó ◽  
...  

A kórházban kezelt sebészeti és belgyógyászati betegekben jelentős a vénásthromboembolia-rizikó. Profilaxis nélkül, a műtét típusától függően, a sebészeti beavatkozások kapcsán a betegek 15–60%-ában alakul ki mélyvénás trombózis vagy tüdőembólia, és az utóbbi ma is vezető kórházi halálok. Bár a vénás thromboemboliát leggyakrabban a közelmúltban végzett műtéttel vagy traumával hozzák kapcsolatba, a szimptómás thromboemboliás események 50–70%-a és a fatális tüdőembóliák 70–80%-a nem a sebészeti betegekben alakul ki. Nemzetközi és hazai felmérések alapján a nagy kockázattal rendelkező sebészeti betegek többsége megkapja a szükséges trombózisprofilaxist. Azonban profilaxis nélkül marad a rizikóval rendelkező belgyógyászati betegek jelentős része, a konszenzuson alapuló nemzetközi és hazai irányelvi ajánlások ellenére. A belgyógyászati betegek körében növelni kell a profilaxisban részesülők arányát és el kell érni, hogy trombózisrizikó esetén a betegek megkapják a hatásos megelőzést. A beteg trombóziskockázatának felmérése fontos eszköze a vénás thromboembolia által veszélyeztetett betegek felderítésének, megkönnyíti a döntést a profilaxis elrendeléséről és javítja az irányelvi ajánlások betartását. A trombózisveszély megállapításakor, ha nem ellenjavallt, profilaxist kell alkalmazni. „A thromboemboliák kockázatának csökkentése és kezelése” című, 4. magyar antithromboticus irányelv felhívja a figyelmet a vénástrombózis-rizikó felmérésének szükségességére, és elsőként tartalmazza a kórházban fekvő belgyógyászati és sebészeti betegek kockázati kérdőívét. Ismertetjük a kockázatbecslő kérdőíveket és áttekintjük a kérdőívekben szereplő rizikófaktorokra vonatkozó bizonyítékokon alapuló adatokat.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 765-781
Author(s):  
Seema Rohilla ◽  
Harish Dureja ◽  
Vinay Chawla

Anticancer agents play a vital role in the cure of patients suffering from malignancy. Though, the chemotherapeutic agents are associated with various adverse effects which produce significant toxic symptoms in the patients. But this therapy affects both the malignant and normal cells and leads to constricted therapeutic index of antimalignant drugs which adversely impacts the quality of patients’ life. Due to these adversities, sufficient dose of drug is not delivered to patients leading to delay in treatment or improper treatment. Chemoprotective agents have been developed either to minimize or to mitigate the toxicity allied with chemotherapeutic agents. Without any concession in the therapeutic efficacy of anticancer drugs, they provide organ specific guard to normal tissues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document