scholarly journals 1099 Financial Implications of Implementing MSLT-II Trial Findings for Treatment of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma Patients in A Tertiary Referral Centre in The United Kingdom

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A T Misky ◽  
A H Sadr ◽  
D Nikkhah

Abstract Aim Cutaneous malignant melanoma is a significant public health challenge in the United Kingdom. Since the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) version 8 definition of melanoma staging, more melanoma patients are eligible for sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB). Prior to the MSLT-II trial, SLNB positive patients were treated as a distinct group within cutaneous melanoma patients and in most centres would routinely undergo lymph node clearance (LNC) of the regional lymph node basin to control disease. Given the above developments in melanoma care, we compared the cost of SLNB and monitoring to the cost of LNC for patients with melanoma. Method We retrospectively reviewed all SLNB positive patients undergoing LNC or surveillance in 2019. We measured the cost of all clinical encounters for both groups and performed a cost analysis. Results Our study shows that the mean cost per patient of axillary LNC is £4731.64 and groin LNC is £5381.78 against a cost of £2896.67 for SLNBs. Mean inpatient stay was 2.8 nights following LNC and 0.11 nights following SLNB. 50% of LNCs and 11% of SLNBs were associated with post-operative complications. Conclusions Our data shows that treating uncomplicated SLNB positive patients with surveillance rather than immediate LNC results in reduced morbidity, lower complication rate and shorter inpatient stay for the patients, as well as lower financial burden to the unit. This is reflected by the UK Consensus statement on melanoma, suggesting that LNC should not be routinely offered for positive SLNB without high-risk features.

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P11
Author(s):  
Angela Sandru ◽  
Silviu Voinea ◽  
Eugenia Panaitescu ◽  
Madalina Bolovan ◽  
Adina Stanciu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A T Misky ◽  
A H Sadr ◽  
D Nikkhah

Abstract Aim Cutaneous malignant melanoma is a significant public health challenge in the United Kingdom. Wide local excision with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is the current standard of treatment for most lesions. Some patients with positive SLNB would routinely undergo locoregional Lymph Node Clearance (LNC). Results of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II) published in August 2017 challenged this approach, showing no melanoma specific survival benefit, but significant morbidity associated with routine LNC. Our study aims to show a change in practice at a tertiary plastic surgical referral centre in response to these results. Method We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database for all LNCs performed for cutaneous, non-head and neck malignant melanoma using the search terms ‘clearance’ and ‘dissection’ between 2015 and 2019. Results We performed 128 axillary and groin LNCs for cutaneous malignant melanoma 2015-2019. The range of LNCs per year varied from 38 in 2015 to 10 in 2019 (mean 25.6, median 28). The total number of LNCs, as well as LNCs performed following positive SLNB decreased after August 2017. Conclusions The data shows that our centre acknowledged evidence and reduced the number of LNCs performed after publication of MSLT-II. We expect that the number of avoided LNCs has saved significant resources due to reduced length of stay, and avoided our patient’s significant morbidity, including seromas, infections and lymphoedema. We recommend all skin cancer treatment centres to follow the evidence in order to provide excellent care and save resources.


Author(s):  
ALEXANDER FOUIRNAIES

In more than half of the democratic countries in the world, candidates face legal constraints on how much money they can spend on their electoral campaigns, yet we know little about the consequences of these restrictions. I study how spending limits affect UK House of Commons elections. I contribute new data on the more than 70,000 candidates who ran for a parliamentary seat from 1885 to 2019, and I document how much money each candidate spent, how they allocated their resources across different spending categories, and the spending limit they faced. To identify the effect on elections, I exploit variation in spending caps induced by reforms of the spending-limit formula that affected some but not all constituencies. The results indicate that when the level of permitted spending is increased, the cost of electoral campaigns increases, which is primarily driven by expenses related to advertisement and mainly to the disadvantage of Labour candidates; the pool of candidates shrinks and elections become less competitive; and the financial and electoral advantages enjoyed by incumbents are amplified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document