scholarly journals EP.TH.879Does ‘fast -track’ axillary node clearance following positive core biopsy lead to overtreatment of axilla?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdullah ◽  
Velin Voynov ◽  
Paul Stonelake
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Axillary Dissection ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Axillary Node Clearance ◽  
Positive Core ◽  
Group B

Abstract Aims Axillary node clearance (ANC) can cause lifelong disability and conservative axillary dissection is increasingly preferred. However, direct (fast-track) ANC after preoperative axillary biopsy is still performed, which may be overtreating the patients with low axillary burden. This study aims to identify if direct (fast- track) ANC leads to overtreatment of axilla. Methods Retrospective data for all breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 were included in this study. The histopathology results of ANC were correlated with axillary ultrasound findings, axillary biopsy or SLNB results and effect of neoadjuvant treatment. These were analysed against the available guidelines to evaluate the current practice. Results 82 patients out of 520 had ANC (15.7%). Four groups were identified. 35.5% of patients diagnosed with nodal infiltration on preoperative biopsy (Group A) had only 1- 2 positive nodes following ANC. Complete pathological response was observed in 37.5% patients with nodal infiltration who had ANC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (Group B). No further nodes were subsequently found in 63.6% of patients who underwent ANC following positive SLNB (Group C). Group D included 2 patients with axillary recurrence. Conclusions 15.7% of breast cancer patients required ANC. The practice of direct (fast-track) ANC after axillary biopsy leads to overtreatment of the axilla, which needs re-evaluation. Targeted axillary dissection could avoid unnecessary axillary dissection in patients with abnormal nodes. This is now recommended in patients who have received NACT but has not been evaluated yet in patients with up front surgery.

TP8.1.1 Does ultrasound quantification of suspicious axillary nodes correlate with pathological results?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Retrospective Data ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Axillary Ultrasound ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Axillary Node Clearance ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Abnormal Node

Abstract Aims Fast-track axillary node clearance (ANC) leads to overtreatment of axilla. Improved quantification by axillary US (AUS) is suggested to avoid unnecessary ANC and proceed with ANC or SLNB based on the number of abnormal axillary nodes. This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate whether ANC can be omitted based on AUS quantification in patients with low axillary burden. Methods Retrospective data of breast cancer patients who underwent ANC following a positive pre-operative axillary nodal biopsy between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 were included in this study. The patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, those having ANC following positive SLNB and those with axillary recurrence were excluded. The histopathology results of ANC were correlated with axillary ultrasound findings. Results 45 patients underwent fast-track ANC following positive axillary core biopsy. On pre-operative AUS, 18 of these patients were reported to have a single abnormal node, while 8 had two abnormal nodes and 19 patients had multiple abnormal nodes. The comparison of the number of metastatic nodes following ANC, and the reported abnormal nodes on pre-operative AUS, showed that 57.3% of patients with 1 – 2 abnormal nodes on AUS had 3 or more metastatic nodes and 26.3% of patients with multiple abnormal nodes on AUS had 1 – 2 metastatic nodes following ANC. Conclusions The quantification of the axillary burden with pre-operative AUS does not correlate with the number of metastatic axillary nodes. The reported relevant axillary burden on AUS is not sufficiently specific to form the basis of omission of ANC.

scholarly journals Prospective study of hair recovery after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with scalp cooling in Japanese breast cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shozo Ohsumi ◽  
Sachiko Kiyoto ◽  
Mina Takahashi ◽  
Seiki Takashima ◽  
Kenjiro Aogi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Scalp Cooling ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Chemotherapy Infusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Group B

Abstract Purpose Scalp cooling during chemotherapy infusion to mitigate alopecia for breast cancer patients is becoming widespread; however, studies regarding hair recovery after chemotherapy with scalp cooling are limited. We conducted a prospective study of hair recovery after chemotherapy with scalp cooling. Patients and methods One hundred and seventeen Japanese female breast cancer patients who completed planned (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy using the Paxman Scalp Cooling System for alopecia prevention were evaluated for alopecia prevention in our prospective study. We evaluated their hair recovery 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 months after chemotherapy. Primary outcomes were grades of alopecia judged by two investigators (objective grades) and patients’ answers to the questionnaire regarding the use of a wig or hat (subjective grades). Results Of 117 patients, 75 completed scalp cooling during the planned chemotherapy cycles (Group A), but 42 discontinued it mostly after the first cycle (Group B). Objective and subjective grades were significantly better in Group A than in Group B throughout 1 year, and at 4 and 7 months after chemotherapy. When we restricted patients to those with objective Grade 3 (hair loss of > 50%) at 1 month, Group A exhibited slightly faster hair recovery based on the objective grades than Group B. There was less persistent alopecia in Group A than in Group B. Conclusions Scalp cooling during chemotherapy infusion for Japanese breast cancer patients increased the rate of hair recovery and had preventive effects against persistent alopecia.

scholarly journals Usefulness of 3D-surgical guides in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Shin Lee ◽  
Hee Jeong Kim ◽  
Il Yong Chung ◽  
Jisun Kim ◽  
Sae Byul Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Original Tumor ◽  
Surgical Guides ◽  
Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy ◽  
Tumor Area

AbstractWe used 3D printed-breast surgical guides (3DP-BSG) to designate the original tumor area from the pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Targeting the original tumor area in such patients using conventional localization techniques is difficult. For precise BCS, a method that marks the tumor area found on MRI directly to the breast is needed. In this prospective study, patients were enrolled for BCS after receiving NST. Partial resection was performed using a prone/supine MRI-based 3DP-BSG. Frozen biopsies were analyzed to confirm clear tumor margins. The tumor characteristics, pathologic results, resection margins, and the distance between the tumor and margin were analyzed. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled with 3DP-BSG for BCS. The median nearest distance between the tumor and the resection margin was 3.9 cm (range 1.2–7.8 cm). Frozen sections showed positive margins in 4/39 (10.3%) patients. Three had invasive cancers, and one had carcinoma in situ; all underwent additional resection. Final pathology revealed clear margins. After 3-year surveillance, 3/39 patients had recurrent breast cancer. With 3DP-BSG for BCS in breast cancer patients receiving NST, the original tumor area can be identified and marked directly on the breast, which is useful for surgery. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) Identifier Number: KCT0002272. First registration number and date: No. 1 (27/04/2016).

Aesthetic outcome and patient’s quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12587-e12587
Author(s):  
Sidra Afzal ◽  
Asad Parvaiz ◽  
Nida Javed
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Immediate Reconstruction ◽  
Patient’S Satisfaction ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

e12587 Background: : Although post mastectomy Immediate breast reconstruction has shown to improve physical and psychosocial well-being of breast cancer patients, this is not a usual procedure in Pakistan due to limited resources and lack of awareness. The aim of our study is to evaluate patient’s satisfaction/ aesthetic outcomes between the patients undergoing mastectomy alone (Group A) and the ones undergoing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction (Group B). Methods: This is a prospective study conducted at Shaukat Khanum Hospital Pakistan comparing aesthetic outcome, patient’s satisfaction and Quality of life between two groups using Breast Q module. All patients undergoing mastectomy with and without reconstruction between April 2017 to July 2019 are included. Sample size of 84 was calculated (42 in each group). Results: The mean Q score of satisfaction with the breast in group B is 82.64 and in group A is 35.82 (P = 0.001). The mean Q score of Psychosocial well-being in group B is 89 vs 44.95 in group A (P = 0.001). The mean Q score of Physical well-being in group B is 98.23 vs 90.41 in group A (P = 0.002). The mean Q score of sexual well-being in group B is 81.93 vs 43 in Group A (P = 0.001). [Mean difference in score of 5-10 - little change, 10-20 - moderate change, > 20 - significant change].The mean difference between two groups in satisfaction with breast , psychosocial well-being and sexual well-being is more than 20 with a statistically significant p-value, while in physical well-being the mean difference is 7.8 which falls in little change group. Conclusions: Our study shows that reconstruction helps breast cancer patients in providing comprehensive care in a manner that they achieve a higher satisfaction with their appearance, psychological and sexual well-being without compromising oncological safety and this should be practiced more in our country. Also patients education about these procedures should be raised to help them fighting against this disease

scholarly journals Tumor-Biological Factors Upa and PAI-1 as Stratification Criteria of a Multicenter Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial in Node-Negative Breast Cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Prechtl ◽  
N. Harbeck ◽  
C. Thomssen ◽  
C. Meisner ◽  
M. Braun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Pai 1

In axillary node-negative primary breast cancer, 70% of the patients will be cured by locoregional treatment alone. Therefore, adjuvant systemic therapy is only needed for those 30% of node-negative patients who will relapse after primary therapy and eventually die of metastases. Traditional histomorphological and clinical factors do not provide sufficient information to allow accurate risk group assessment in order to identify node-negative patients who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. In the last decade various groups have reported a strong and statistically independent prognostic impact of the serine protease uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) and its inhibitor PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1) in node-negative breast cancer patients. Based on these data, a prospective multicenter therapy trial in node-negative breast cancer patients was started in Germany in June 1993, supported by the German Research Association (DFG). Axillary node-negative breast cancer patients with high levels of either or both proteolytic factors in the tumor tissue were randomized to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy versus observation only. Recruitment was continued until the end of 1998, by which time 684 patients had been enrolled. Since then, patients have been followed up in order to assess the value of uPA and PAI-1 determination as an adequate selection criterion for adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative breast cancer patients. This paper reports on the rationale and design of this prospective multicenter clinical trial, which may have an impact on future policies in prognosis-oriented treatment strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document