EP.TU.411Thinking Ahead: Improving Documentation of Treatment Escalation Plans for Surgical Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Tregidgo ◽  
Grace Sutton ◽  
Hasan Mukhtar ◽  
Charlie Cave

Abstract Aims The GMC recommends early decision making on CPR status for all acutely unwell patients admitted to hospital. An audit was undertaken of documentation of treatment escalation plans (TEPs) for general surgical patients at a District General Hospital. Method A retrospective study looking at documentation of TEPs in patients (n = 55) admitted under the care of the general surgical team over a one month period. Documentation from the surgical admission clerking and the first consultant ward round were reviewed for evidence of a TEP. Results Of 55 patients admitted only 24% had a TEP documented within 48 hours of admission under the general surgeons. Of those that had a TEP recorded (n = 13), twelve were in the admission surgical clerking and one was completed on the post-take consultant ward round. Conclusions This project highlighted the lack of TEP documentation for surgical patients within 48 hours of admission to hospital. Our recommendation is to develop a specific ‘post-take ward round’ proforma with mandatory TEP, to be filled out within 24 hours of patient admission. This updated process will then be reassessed for improved compliance with TEP documentation. We anticipate this will improve early decision making regarding escalation status and facilitate TEP discussions with patients. Overall this process should help ensure a more patient-centered approach to care planning.

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Tincknell ◽  
Sarah Burton ◽  
Claire Cooke ◽  
Stephen Black ◽  
Stefano Andreani ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION With reduced working hours and shift patterns, surgical training and continuity of patient care is being put at risk. We have devised a system for managing the emergency surgical patients in an effort to counteract these perceived problems. This study describes the emergency surgical team and audits its activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS The emergency surgery team concept is described in detail. Over a 2-week period, general surgical referral data, patient management and operative activity were audited. RESULTS A total of 229 patients were referred to the emergency surgical team with 159 treated conservatively, 45 underwent operative intervention and 25 were discharged without admission. Of the emergency surgical team referrals, 58% had gallstone pathology, appendicitis or constipation/non-specific abdominal pain. Average daily number of patients under the care of the emergency surgical team was 26 (range, 10–40). CONCLUTIONS The consultant-led emergency surgical team look after many of the acutely sick surgical patients. Our system not only provides good teaching opportunities but ensures optimal continuity of patient care in a busy district general hospital. Such an approach to emergency surgical care has been successfully developed to optimise training opportunities and improve patient care in a setting of reduced working hours and shift systems in our hospital.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo G. Cuevas ◽  
Kerth O'Brien ◽  
Somnath Saha

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noé Pérez Carrillo ◽  
Carlos Emiliano García Córdova ◽  
Ana Paula Ruiz Funes Molina ◽  
Alberto Manuel Ángeles Castellanos ◽  
Mayra Estrada Serrano ◽  
...  

The current landscape represents an unprecedented challenge in managing surgical patients, decision-making and the use of resources such as protective equipment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the objective of this article is to provide guidelines for good conduct in the operating room, the use of personal protective equipment, suggestions for surgeries and the best approach in the context of this situation. The main objective of these recommendations is to mitigate the risk of contagion and to educate medical-surgical health personnel in how to deal with this pandemic. Key words: COVID-19; coronavirus: protective equipment; surgery; operating room; training; emergency


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1352-1355
Author(s):  
Marianna V. Mapes ◽  
Peter A. DePergola ◽  
William T. McGee

Decision-making for the hospitalized dying and critically ill is often characterized by an understanding of autonomy that leads to clinical care and outcomes that are antithetical to patients’ preferences around suffering and quality of life. A better understanding of autonomy will facilitate the ultimate goal of a patient-centered approach and ensure compassionate, high-quality care that respects our patients’ values. We reviewed the medical literature and our experiences through the ethics service, palliative care service, and critical care service of a large community teaching hospital. The cumulative experience of a senior intensivist was filtered through the lens of a medical ethicist and the palliative care team. The practical application of patient-centered care was discerned from these interactions. We determined that a clearer understanding of patient-centeredness would improve the experience and outcomes of care for our patients as well as our adherence to ethical practice. The practical applications of autonomy and patient-centered care were evaluated by the authors through clinical interactions on the wards to ascertain problems in understanding their meaning. Clarification of autonomy and patient-centeredness is provided using specific examples to enhance understanding and application of these principles in patient-centered care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document