scholarly journals fMRI revealed neural substrate for reversible working memory dysfunction in subclinical hypothyroidism

Brain ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (11) ◽  
pp. 2923-2930 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.-F. Zhu ◽  
Z.-X. Wang ◽  
D.-R. Zhang ◽  
Z.-L. Pan ◽  
S. He ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 565 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.C. Javitt ◽  
A-M. Shelley ◽  
E. Leiderman ◽  
L. March ◽  
N. Cowan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zakia Z Haque ◽  
Ranshikha Samandra ◽  
Farshad Alizadeh Mansouri

The concept of working memory refers to a collection of cognitive abilities and processes involved in the short-term storage of task-relevant information to guide the ongoing and upcoming behaviour and therefore describes an important aspect of executive control of behaviour for achieving goals. Deficits in working memory and related cognitive abilities have been observed in patients with brain damage or neuropsychological disorders and therefore it is important to better understand neural substrate and underlying mechanisms of working memory. Working memory relies on neural mechanisms that enable encoding, maintenance and manipulation of stored information as well as integrating them with ongoing and future goals. Recently, a surge in brain stimulation studies have led to development of various non-invasive techniques for localized stimulation of prefrontal and other cortical regions in humans. These brain stimulation techniques can potentially be tailored to influence neural activities in particular brain regions and modulate cognitive functions and behaviour. Combined use of brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiological recording have provided a great opportunity to monitor neural activity in various brain regions and non-invasively intervene and modulate cognitive functions in cognitive tasks. These studies have shed more light on the neural substrate and underlying mechanisms of working memory in humans. Here, we review findings and insight from these brain stimulation studies about the contribution of brain regions, and particularly prefrontal cortex, to working memory.


1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Shelley ◽  
Daniel C. Javitt ◽  
Herbert G. Vaughan ◽  
Gail Silipo

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (s1) ◽  
pp. A13-A13
Author(s):  
C R Clark ◽  
A C McFarlane ◽  
P Morris ◽  
G F Egan ◽  
D L Weber ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna Haenschel ◽  
Robert A. Bittner ◽  
Fabian Haertling ◽  
Anna Rotarska-Jagiela ◽  
Konrad Maurer ◽  
...  

Neuroscience ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M. Hoskison ◽  
A.N. Moore ◽  
B. Hu ◽  
S. Orsi ◽  
N. Kobori ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 150 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danijela Piskulic ◽  
James S. Olver ◽  
Trevor R. Norman ◽  
Paul Maruff

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1450-1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. McAllister ◽  
Laura A. Flashman ◽  
Brenna C. McDonald ◽  
Andrew J. Saykin

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn E. Jones ◽  
Marie Rowland ◽  
R. Martyn Bracewell

Whilst olfactory dysfunction has been reported in Korsakoff's Syndrome (KS) patients, the diagnostic implications of this have not been fully explored. KS can be difficult to diagnose because cognitive symptoms are similar to other diagnoses. For instance, patients with Frontal Lobe (FL) Syndrome may present with memory impairments that are similar to KS. Participants were given the Benton Visual Retention Test-Fifth Edition (BVRT-V), to identify working memory dysfunction, and a Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT), to evaluate olfactory function. B-SIT scores were found to be significantly lower in the KS group compared to the control and FL groups. In contrast, the error scores on the BVRT-V were significantly higher in both the KS and FL groups compared to the healthy control subjects. Therefore, we suggest that olfactory function may aid in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with working memory dysfunction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document