scholarly journals Preference for and Sensitivity to Flavanol Mean Degree of Polymerization in Model Wines Is Correlated with Body Composition (P06-100-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Griffin ◽  
Charles Diako ◽  
Lindsey Miller ◽  
Andrew Neilson ◽  
Carolyn Ross ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6-n-propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype. Methods Recruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP. Results Considering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP. Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods. Funding Sources Funding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.

1969 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. H. Duthie ◽  
P. H. Foulkes ◽  
H. V. Atherton

A comparative study of skimmilk fat tests indicated the need for a more accurate method. Such a method was developed at the Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station. Called the Vermont method, this uses Patton's aqueous reagent of n-butylamine and n-butanol, Babcock equipment and glassware, and the TeSa water bath. This Vermont method is simple, inexpensive, and no more time cousuming than the Babcock procedure. Twenty-two trials were performed whereby skimmilk samples were collected weekly from 6 milk dealers and tested by 5 or 6 methods. Several milk dealers sold skimmilk that consistently tested higher than 0.50% fat as determined by the Mojonnier procedure. It was apparent that results obtained with the Babcock, Wildasin Babcock (use of a quaternary ammonium compound), and American Association (modified Babcock using n-butanol) methods showed poor fat percentage agreement over the legal fat range, compared with the Mojonnier procedure. Data from the Gerber and Vermont methods showed very close agreement with that of the Mojonnier procedure. Statistical analysis indicated a significant difference (P < 0.01) between fat percentages obtained using the Babcock, Wildasin Babcock, and American Association methods when compared with the Mojonnier technique. Results from the Gerber and Vermont methods were not significantly different from those obtained with the Mojonnier procedure. Precision for the Vermont method was determined by testing 10 replicate samples of 2. different skimmilks. The means and standard deviations for the samples are as follows: 0.12.% ± 0.005, and 0.44% ± 0.007. Use of the Vermont method must await results of studies from other laboratories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document