scholarly journals Herd Protection by a Bivalent Killed Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine in the Slums of Kolkata, India

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1123-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali ◽  
Dipika Sur ◽  
Young Ae You ◽  
Suman Kanungo ◽  
Binod Sah ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramadhan Hashim ◽  
Ahmed M. Khatib ◽  
Godwin Enwere ◽  
Jin Kyung Park ◽  
Rita Reyburn ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1149-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dang Duc Anh ◽  
Do Gia Canh ◽  
Anna Lena Lopez ◽  
Vu Dinh Thiem ◽  
Phan Thi Long ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. e1028-e1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly F Franke ◽  
Ralph Ternier ◽  
J Gregory Jerome ◽  
Wilfredo R Matias ◽  
Jason B Harris ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraful Islam Khan ◽  
Mohammad Ali ◽  
Julia Lynch ◽  
Alamgir Kabir ◽  
Jean-Louis Excler ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1252-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali ◽  
Firdausi Qadri ◽  
Deok Ryun Kim ◽  
Taufiqul Islam ◽  
Justin Im ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundSeveral studies have shown that inactivated, whole-cell oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) confer both direct protection on vaccinees and herd protection on populations. Because our earlier cluster-randomized effectiveness trial (CRT) in urban Bangladesh failed to detect OCV herd protection, we reanalysed the trial to assess whether herd effects were masked in our original analysis.MethodsA total of 267 270 persons were randomized to 90 approximately equal-sized clusters. In 60 clusters persons aged 1 year and older were eligible to receive OCV and in 30 clusters persons received no intervention and served as controls. We analysed OCV protection against severely dehydrating cholera for the entire clusters, as in our original analysis, and for subclusters consisting of residents of innermost households. We hypothesized that if OCV herd protection was attenuated by cholera transmission into the clusters from the outside in this densely populated setting, herd protection would be most evident in the innermost households.ResultsDuring 2 years of follow-up of all residents of the clusters, total protection (protection of OCV recipients relative to control residents) was 58% [95% confidence interval (CI): 43%, 70%; P<0.0001], indirect protection (protection of non-OCV recipients in OCV clusters relative to control participants) was 16% (95% CI: –20%, 41%; P=0.35) and overall OCV protection (protection of all residents in the OCV clusters relative to control residents) was 46% (95% CI: 30%, 59%; P<0.0001). Analyses of the inner 75% and 50% households of the clusters showed similar findings. However, total protection was 75% (95% CI: 50%, 87%, P<0.0001), indirect protection 52% (95% CI: –9%, 79%; P=0.08) and overall protection 72% (95% CI: 49%, 84%; P<0.0001) for the innermost 25% households.ConclusionConsistent with past studies, substantial OCV herd protective effects were identified, but were unmasked only by analysing innermost households of the clusters. Caution is needed in defining clusters for analysis of vaccine herd effects in CRTs of vaccines.


2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin N. Desai ◽  
Zenebe Akalu ◽  
Samuel Teshome ◽  
Mekonnen Teferi ◽  
Lawrence Yamuah ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e0007989
Author(s):  
Fahima Chowdhury ◽  
Taufiqur Rahman Bhuiyan ◽  
Afroza Akter ◽  
Md Saruar Bhuiyan ◽  
Ashraful Islam Khan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document