PS02.031: DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY WITH DOCETAXEL, CISPLATIN, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (DCF-R) FOR ADVANCED CERVICAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 128-129
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Okamoto ◽  
Yusuke Taniyama ◽  
Tadashi Sakurai ◽  
Takahiro Heishi ◽  
Chiaki Sato ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has become one of the essential treatment strategies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and has been especially gaining prevalence for cervical ESCC to preserve the larynx. There have been recent reports on favorable outcomes of docetaxel/CDDP/5-FU (DCF-R) for advanced esophageal cancer. Our department recently introduced DCF-R for treating advanced cervical ESCC. We analyzed the safety and outcomes of DCF-R in patients with advanced cervical ESCC. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 12 advanced cervical ESCC patients (clinical stage II–IV, including T4b and/or M1 lymph node) in our department who received DCF-R as the first-line treatment between December 2010 and February 2015. Results Our patient cohort comprised 9 males and 3 females (median age, 67.5 years; range: 54–76 years). All patients were squamous cell carcinoma. The median observation period was 34.5 (8–80) months with total irradiation dose of 64.0 (60–70) Gy. The pretreatment clinical stage (according to Union for International Cancer Center) included one stage II, seven stage III, and four stage IV cases (including 3 patients with T4b [2 trachea and 1 thyroid] and 4 patients with M1 lymph node. We attained complete response (CR) in 10 patients and stable disease in 2 patients. Of 10 patients with CR, 5 experienced recurrence and 5 continued exhibiting CR. Two persistent patients included one patient who died of cancer and one patient who underwent salvage surgery. Furthermore, grade 3 or more adverse events as defined in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 4 included leucopenia (91.7%), neutropenia (91.7%), febrile neutropenia (50%), and pharyngeal pain (50%). There was no treatment-related mortality and treatment schedules were completed in all patients, although dose reduction of the second cycle of chemotherapy was required in four patients (33%) and change in the radiation schedule was required in one patient (8.3%). While the 2-/3-/5-year overall survival rate was 66.7%/48.6%/48.6%, the 2-/3-/5-year recurrent-free survival rate was 58.3%/50.0%/37.5%, respectively. Conclusion DCF-R treatment for advanced cervical ESCC could be completed by the careful administration, and although a strong blood toxicity might occur, a favorable prognosis can be obtained with larynx preservation. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Hayashi ◽  
Tsutomu Nishida ◽  
Masahiko Tsujii ◽  
Shusaku Tsutsui ◽  
Katsumi Yamamoto ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Gion ◽  
Carlo Tremolada ◽  
Riccardo Mione ◽  
Paolo della Palma ◽  
Ruggero Dittadi ◽  
...  

Serum levels of several tumor markers were studied in 96 patients with untreated primary squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Three markers specific for digestive tract malignancies - CEA, CA19.9 and CA50 - and two non organ specific indicators of malignancy - ferritin and TPA - were evaluated. Positivity rates of CAI9.9 and CA50 were very low (4.4 % and 8.6 % respectively); the markers were therefore considered ineffective in the disease. CEA, TPA and ferritin showed a fair positivity rate (27.1 %, 28.1 %, 33.7% respectively); CEA and TPA were directly related to clinical stage, CEA levels being significantly higher in stage IV than in stage III cases (p = 0.016). TPA preoperatory levels were also directly related to a lower survival probability (p = 0.004). CEA showed significantly lower levels in tumors of lower than in those of middle (p = 0.03) and upper esophagus (p = 0.004). TPA showed a similar behaviour with lower levels in tumors of lower than of middle esophagus (p = 0.03). These findings could be due to a bulky metabolism of tumor markers drained via portail vein in the liver. From our data the following conclusions may be drawn: 1) CEA and TPA may be useful in the staging of esophageal cancer as an ancillary tool to assess the extent of the disease; 2) tumor location is an important variable when evaluating blood levels of tumor markers in patients with esophageal cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document