P84 LOCALIZATION OF UNDETECTED RESIDUAL TUMOR AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B J van der Wilk ◽  
M Doukas ◽  
B M Eyck ◽  
M C W Spaander ◽  
E J Schoon ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The preSANO-trial aimed to determine accuracy of clinical response evaluations (CREs) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally-advanced esophageal cancer. After introduction of the ‘bite-on-bite’ biopsy-technique, most residual tumors were detected. Aim of this study was to determine the location of residual tumors that were not detected during CREs and whether or not endoscopic (bite-on-bite) biopsies had the theoretical potential to detect these tumors. Methods In this side-study of the prospective preSANO trial, biopsies and resection specimens were independently revised by two GI-pathologists. All patients were included that had residual tumor in the resection specimen that was not detected during two clinical response evaluations, 6 and 12 weeks after completion of nCRT. In the resection specimen, the tumor regression grade was defined for each esophageal wall layer. It was determined how often submucosal tumors under a tumor-free mucosal layer were missed during CREs. Biopsies taken during CREs were revised for the presence of submucosal tissue. This was defined as presence of submucosal structures, i.e. submucosal glands and/or thick-walled vessel-structures. Results Some 103 of 207 patients underwent CREs followed by surgery. Residual tumor was not detected during CREs in 33 patients. Resection specimens of 28 of these patients were available for revision. Missed residual tumors were located in the mucosal layer of the esophageal wall in 64% of these patients. Residual tumors were located in the submucosal layer, under a tumor-free mucosal layer, in 29% of patients. One patient still had tumor under a tumor-free mucosal- and submucosal layer. Submucosal structures were detected in two patients and it was uncertain whether submucosal tissue was present in six patients, while no specific submucosal structures were detected in 21 patients. Conclusion The majority of patients in whom residual tumor remained undetected during clinical response evaluations had tumor cells in the mucosal layer of the esophageal wall. Nearly one third of the patients had tumor in the submucosal layer under a tumor-free mucosa. Whether these submucosal tumors can be detected using endoscopic biopsies is uncertain. Further improvement of the accuracy of CREs should focus on sampling of larger mucosal areas, for example by using brush techniques.

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben D. van der Bogt ◽  
Berend J. van der Wilk ◽  
Suzan Nikkessen ◽  
Kausilia K. Krishnadath ◽  
Erik J. Schoon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Endoscopic evaluation of the esophageal mucosa may play a role in an active surveillance strategy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. This study investigated the yield of endoscopic findings for detection of residual disease. Methods Patients from the multicenter preSANO cohort, who underwent nCRT followed by surgery for esophageal or junctional cancer, were included. Upper endoscopy was performed 6 and 12 weeks after nCRT. Patients with residual disease at 6 weeks underwent immediate surgery. Endoscopic records were reviewed for presence of stenosis, suspicion of residual tumor, scar tissue, and ulceration. Presence and type of endoscopic findings were compared with outcome of the resection specimen. Results 118 of 156 patients (76 %) had residual disease in the resection specimen. Endoscopic suspicion of residual tumor was significantly associated with presence of residual disease. At 6 weeks, 40/112 patients with residual disease and 4/33 patients with complete response had endoscopic suspicion of residual tumor (36 % vs. 12 %; P = 0.01), while this was reported in 16/73 and 0/28 patients, respectively, at 12 weeks (22 % vs. 0 %; P < 0.01). Positive predictive value of endoscopic suspicion of residual tumor was 91 % at 6 weeks and 100 % at 12 weeks. Endoscopic findings of non-passable stenosis, passable stenosis, scar tissue, or ulceration were not associated with residual disease. Conclusions Endoscopic suspicion of residual tumor was the only endoscopic finding associated with residual disease. Based on its positive predictive value, this endoscopic finding may contribute to the diagnostic strategy used in active surveillance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Jasper Groen ◽  
Suzanne Gisbertz ◽  
Mark I Van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
Annelijn E Slaman ◽  
Sybren Meijer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Celiac trunk metastases are an independent factor for inferior survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Detecting these metastases before esophagostomy would aid clinical decision making. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of integrated PET and CT (PET-CT) using 18F-FDG in detecting these metastases in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRTx) followed by esophagectomy. Methods All patients with a carcinoma of the mid-to-distal esophagus or the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) who underwent esophageal resection with curative intent following nCRTx between January 2011 and January 2017 were included. The PET-CT scans after nCRTx were reviewed by nuclear radiologists and lymph nodes within a margin of 2 cm around the celiac trunk were expressed in SUVmax. Lymph nodes with SUVmax > 2.0 were deemed positive. The truncal nodes were extracted during esophagectomy and reviewed by different pathologists using standard pathology protocol. To assess the accuracy of the PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastases near the celiac trunk the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value were calculated. Results A total of 448 patients were included. There were 24 patients (5.4%) with positive truncal nodes on the PET-CT versus 424 patients (90.6%) with negative truncal nodes on the PET-CT. Out of these 24 patients 20 (83.3%) had truncal node metastases confirmed in the resection specimen (positive predictive value of 83.3%). In the other 424 patients 40 (9.4%) had truncal node metastases confirmed in the resection specimen (negative predictive value of 90.6%). This results in a sensitivity of 33.3% and a specificity of 99.0%. Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of the PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastases near the celiac trunk in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent nCRTx were respectively 33.3% and 99.0% This shows that the PET-CT is accurate in detecting truncal lymph node metastases in this patient group. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 947-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kraipop Wongwaiyut ◽  
Sakchai Ruangsin ◽  
Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol ◽  
Siriporn Leelakiatpaiboon ◽  
Duangjai Sangthawan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Machiels ◽  
Maurits L. van Montfoort ◽  
Nikki B. Thuijs ◽  
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
Tanja Alderliesten ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The microscopic tumor spread (MS) beyond the macroscopic tumor borders of esophageal tumors is crucial for determining the clinical target volume (CTV) in radiotherapy. The question arises whether current voluminous CTV margins of 3–5 cm around the macroscopic gross tumor volume (GTV) to account for MS are still accurate when fiducial markers are used for GTV determination. We aimed to pathologically validate the use of fiducial markers placed on the (echo)endoscopically determined tumor border (EDTB) as a surrogate for macroscopic tumor borders and to analyse the MS beyond EDTBs. Methods Thirty-three consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after (echo)endoscopic fiducial marker implantation at cranial and caudal EDTB were included in this study. Fiducial marker positions were detected in the surgical specimens under CT guidance and demarcated with beads, and subsequently analysed for macroscopic tumor spread and MS beyond the demarcations. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predicting factors for MS beyond EDTB. Results A total of 60 EDTBs were examined in 32 patients. In 50% of patients no or only partial regression of tumor in response to therapy (≥Mandard 3) or higher was seen (i.e., residual tumor group) and included for MS analysis. None had macroscopic tumor spread beyond EDTBs. In the residual tumor group, only 20 and 21% of the cranial and caudal EDTBs were crossed with a maximum of 9 mm and 16 mm MS, respectively. This MS was corrected for each individual determined contraction rate (mean: 93%). Presence of MS beyond EDTB was significantly associated with initial tumor length (p = 0.028). Conclusion Our results validate the use of fiducial markers on EDTB as a surrogate for macroscopic tumor and indicate that CTV margins around the GTV to compensate for MS along the esophageal wall can be limited to 1–1.5 cm, when the GTV is determined with fiducial markers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document