scholarly journals Serial echocardiographical assessment for urgent control of rapid atrial fibrillation in acute heart failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Iwahashi ◽  
J Kirigaya ◽  
M Horii ◽  
Y Hanajima ◽  
T Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Doppler echocardiography is a well-recognized technique for noninvasive evaluation; however, little is known about its efficacy in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) accompanied by acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness of serial echocardiographical assessment for rapid AF patients with ADHF. Patients A total of 110 ADHF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and rapid AF who were admitted to the CCU unit and received landiolol treatmentto decrease the heart rate (HR) to <110 bpm and change HR (ΔHR) of >20% within 24 hours were enrolled. Interventions Immediately after admission, the patients (n=110) received landiolol, and its dose was increased to the maximum; then, we repeatedly performed echocardiography. Among them, 39 patients were monitored using invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) simultaneously with echocardiography. Measurements and main results There were significant relationships between Doppler and RHC parameters through the landiolol treatment (Figure, baseline–max HR treatment). We observed for the major adverse events (MAE) during initial hospitalization, which included cardiac death, HF prolongation (required intravenous treatment at 30 days), and worsening renal function (WRF). MAE occurred in 44 patients, and logistic regression analyses showed that the mean left atrial pressure (mLAP)-Doppler (odds ratio = 1.132, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–1.23, p=0.0004) and stroke volume (SV)-Doppler (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.97, p=0.001) at 24 hours were the significant predictors for MAE, and multivariate analysis showed that mLAP-Doppler was the strongest predictor (odds ratio = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.107–1.27, p=0.0005) (Table). Conclusions During the control of the rapid AF in HFrEF patients withADHF, echocardiography was useful to assess their hemodynamic condition, even at bedside. Doppler for rapid AF of ADHF Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vojtech Melenovsky ◽  
Rosita Zakeri ◽  
Margaret M Redfield ◽  
Barry A Borlaug

Introduction: Left atrial structure and function (LA) is affected by the presence of heart failure (HF), but the specific impact of HF subtype is poorly characterized. Hypothesis: HF-induced LA remodeling differs between patients with preserved (pEF) or reduced ejection fraction (rEF). Methods: 198 consecutive HF patients referred to Mayo Clinic (51% HFpEF, NYHA 3.1±0.7, 66±13 years, 39% females) and 40 HF-free controls of similar age and gender underwent right heart catheterization (LA pressures), echocardiography (LA volumes) and follow-up. Results: Compared with controls, HF patients had larger atria and more impaired LA reservoir and contractile function (total and active LAEF, all p<0.001). At identical mean LA pressure (20 vs 20 mmHg, p=0.9), HFrEF patients had larger LA volumes (LAVI 50 vs 41 ml/m 2 p<0.001), but HFpEF patients had higher LA peak (V-wave) and lower LA minimal pressures, with higher LA stiffness (0.79 vs 0.48 mmHg.ml -1 , p<0.001, Fig-A) and LA pressure pulsatility (19 vs 13 mmHg, p<0.001). Despite smaller LA size, better LA function (total LAEF 39 vs 35 %, p=0.04, active LAEF 30 vs 22 %, p<0.001) and less mitral regurgitation (grade 1.8 vs 2.5, p<0.001), HFpEF patients had more atrial fibrillation (42 vs 26%, p=0.02). After a median follow-up 350 days, 31 HFpEF and 28 HFrEF patients died. LA function was associated with mortality in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF (Fig-B). Conclusions: HFrEF is characterized by greater eccentric LA remodeling, but HFpEF is associated with increased LA stiffening and greater LA pressure pulsatility which may contribute to greater burden of atrial fibrillation. The observation that LA function is more closely linked to outcome in HFpEF supports the goal to maintain or improve LA function in HFpEF.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 606-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuya Kajimoto ◽  
Yuichiro Minami ◽  
Shigeru Otsubo ◽  
Naoki Sato

Background: In acute decompensated heart failure patients with a preserved or reduced ejection fraction, the association of admission and discharge anemia status with outcomes remains unclear. Methods and results: Of the 4842 patients enrolled in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Syndromes (ATTEND) registry, 4433 patients (2017 with a preserved and 2416 with a reduced ejection fraction) were examined to investigate associations among the anemia status at admission and discharge (no anemia, developed anemia, resolved anemia, or persistent anemia), a preserved or reduced ejection fraction and the primary endpoint (all-cause death and readmission for heart failure). In the preserved ejection fraction group, adjusted analysis showed that either developed or persistent anemia was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary endpoint relative to no anemia (hazard ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–2.11; p=0.009 and hazard ratio: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.26–2.04; p<0.001, respectively), but there was no association between resolved anemia and the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.67–1.45; p=0.937). In the reduced ejection fraction group, either developed or resolved anemia was associated with a tendency toward higher risk of the primary endpoint relative to no anemia (hazard ratio: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.95–1.62; p=0.089, and hazard ratio: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.96–1.77; p=0.085, respectively), while persistent anemia was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary endpoint relative to no anemia (hazard ratio: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.12–1.65; p=0.002). Conclusions: In acute decompensated heart failure patients, the association of admission and discharge anemia status with outcomes differs markedly between patients with a preserved or reduced ejection fraction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 726
Author(s):  
Samarthkumar Thakkar ◽  
Harsh Patel ◽  
Kirtenkumar Patel ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Smit Patel ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (14) ◽  
pp. E375
Author(s):  
Michael Zairis ◽  
Nikolaos Patsourakos ◽  
Evdokia Adamopoulou ◽  
Anastassios Theodosis Georgilas ◽  
Kyriakos Argyrakis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Bohn ◽  
Rim M. Hadgu ◽  
Hannah E. Pope ◽  
Jerrica E. Shuster

Background: Thiazide diuretics are often utilized to overcome loop diuretic resistance when treating acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). In addition to a large cost advantage, several pharmacokinetic advantages exist when administering oral metolazone (MTZ) compared with intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide (CTZ), yet many providers are reluctant to utilize an oral formulation to treat ADHF. The purpose of this study was to compare the increase in 24-hour total urine output (UOP) after adding MTZ or CTZ to IV loop diuretics (LD) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and Results: From September 2013 to August 2016, 1002 patients admitted for ADHF received either MTZ or CTZ in addition to LD. Patients were excluded for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 469), <24-hour LD or UOP data prior to drug initiation (n = 129), or low dose MTZ/CTZ (n = 91). A total of 168 patients were included with 64% receiving CTZ. No significant difference was observed between the increase in 24-hour total UOP after MTZ or CTZ initiation (1458 [514, 2401] mL vs 1820 [890, 2750] mL, P = .251). Conclusions: Both MTZ and CTZ similarly increased UOP when utilized as an adjunct to IV LD. These results suggest that while thiazide agents can substantially increase UOP in ADHF patients with HFrEF, MTZ and CTZ have comparable effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document