P276 A meta-analysis on the association of febuxostat compared to allopurinol on blood pressure and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among adult patients with hyperuricemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Barrientos ◽  
R A Macabeo ◽  
R A Ragasa
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Increased uric acid levels have been known to be associated with different cardiovascular and renal diseases.  Over the last few years, several studies have examined the role of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in hypertension and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and results are pointing to a potential role of elevated serum uric acid as an emerging independent cardiovascular risk factor. Objective  To determine if urate-lowering therapy (Febuxostat vs Allopurinol) has an association on blood pressure and MACE among adult patients with hyperuricemia. Methodology Randomized controlled trials with outcomes of blood pressure, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were searched through PubMed and Cochrane database. Results Pooled analysis of studies on hyperuricemic patients showed that Febuxostat 40 mg has no significant difference compared with Allopurinol 100/300mg with respect to lowering diastolic (MD -0.56 with 95% CI of -4.28 to 3.15) and systolic blood pressure (MD -0.72 with 95% CI of -4.87 to 6.31).  No significant differences were also noted on all-cause mortality (OR 1.21 with 95% CI of 0.35 to 4.12) and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.38 with 95% CI of 0.19 to 9.94). Outcomes on non-fatal stroke were only reported by Becker, et. al (2010) with only 2 events reported in the Febuxostat 80 mg group (0.26%) and no event in the Allopurinol group (CI= 0.082 to 1.155). Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis showed that urate-lowering therapy (Febuxostat vs Allopurinol) has no significant association on blood pressure among adult patients with hyperuricemia.  No significant association was also found with respect to all-cause mortality and MI. Outcomes on stroke were inconclusive since only one study reported on its events.

The Association of Febuxostat Compared With Allopurinol on Blood Pressure and Major Adverse Cardiac Events Among Adult Patients With Hyperuricemia: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Barrientos-Regala ◽  
Renelene A. Macabeo ◽  
Rosemarie Ramirez-Ragasa ◽  
Noemi S. Pestaño ◽  
Felix E. R. Punzalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

scholarly journals Prognosis of unrecognised myocardial infarction determined by electrocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Yang ◽  
Wensheng Li ◽  
Hailan Zhu ◽  
Xiong-Fei Pan ◽  
Yunzhao Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
All Cause Mortality

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the prognosis of unrecognised myocardial infarction determined by electrocardiography (UMI-ECG) or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (UMI-CMR).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Data sourcesElectronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar.Study selectionProspective cohort studies were included if they reported adjusted relative risks, odds ratios, or hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for all cause mortality or cardiovascular outcomes in participants with unrecognised myocardial infarction compared with those without myocardial infarction.Data extraction and synthesisThe primary outcomes were composite major adverse cardiac events, all cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality associated with UMI-ECG and UMI-CMR. The secondary outcomes were the risks of recurrent coronary heart disease or myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Pooled hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. The heterogeneity of outcomes was compared in clinically recognised and unrecognised myocardial infarction.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 30 studies with 253 425 participants and 1 621 920 person years of follow-up. UMI-ECG was associated with increased risks of all cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 1.73), cardiovascular mortality (2.33, 1.66 to 3.27), and major adverse cardiac events (1.61, 1.38 to 1.89) compared with the absence of myocardial infarction. UMI-CMR was also associated with increased risks of all cause mortality (3.21, 1.43 to 7.23), cardiovascular mortality (10.79, 4.09 to 28.42), and major adverse cardiac events (3.23, 2.10 to 4.95). No major heterogeneity was observed for any primary outcomes between recognised myocardial infarction and UMI-ECG or UMI-CMR. The absolute risk differences were 7.50 (95% confidence interval 4.50 to 10.95) per 1000 person years for all cause mortality, 11.04 (5.48 to 18.84) for cardiovascular mortality, and 27.45 (17.1 to 40.05) for major adverse cardiac events in participants with UMI-ECG compared with those without myocardial infarction. The corresponding data for UMI-CMR were 32.49 (6.32 to 91.58), 37.2 (11.7 to 104.20), and 51.96 (25.63 to 92.04), respectively.ConclusionsUMI-ECG or UMI-CMR is associated with an adverse long term prognosis similar to that of recognised myocardial infarction. Screening for unrecognised myocardial infarction could be useful for risk stratification among patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease.

Pioglitazone and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Other Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagapradeep Nagajothi ◽  
Sasikanth Adigopula ◽  
Saravanan Balamuthusamy ◽  
Jose-Luis E Velazquez-Cecena ◽  
Kalpana Raghunathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

scholarly journals The Effect of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure in Young People and Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin F. Liang ◽  
Samuel Z. Lim ◽  
Wilson W. Tam ◽  
Cyrus S. Ho ◽  
Melvyn W. Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Adolescents And Adults ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Pre Treatment

Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to study the effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and a number of adverse cardiac events on patients receiving treatment for attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) in comparison to placebo and between atomoxetine and methylphenidate. Methods: We searched the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect. Meta-analysis was performed on studies that examined the relationships between methylphenidate or atomoxetine and HR, SBP, as well as a number of adverse cardiac events. These studies were either placebo-controlled or comparison studies between methylphenidate and atomoxetine. Meta-regression identified patient- and treatment-related factors that may contribute to heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-two studies were included and the total number of participants was 46,107. Children/adolescents and adults treated with methylphenidate had more significant increases in post- vs. pre-treatment HR (p < 0.001) and SBP (p < 0.001) than those treated by placebo. Children and adolescents treated with atomoxetine had more significant increases post- vs. pre-treatment HR (p = 0.025) and SBP (p < 0.001) than those treated with methylphenidate. Meta-regression revealed mean age of participants, mean dose, and duration of atomoxetine and methylphenidate as significant moderators that explained heterogeneity. There were no differences in the number of adverse cardiac events between participants with methylphenidate treatment and placebo or atomoxetine. Conclusions: Children/adolescents and adults treated with methylphenidate resulted in significant increases in post- vs. pre-treatment HR and SBP as compared to placebo. Similarly, children and adolescents treated with atomoxetine had significant increases in post- vs. pre-treatment HR and SBP than those treated with methylphenidate. These findings have potential implications for continuous monitoring of HR and SBP throughout the course of treatment although the risk for adverse cardiac events were insignificant.

scholarly journals High Blood Pressure Variability is an Additional Cardiovascular Risk Factor

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-98
Author(s):  
A. V. Rodionov
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Calcium Antagonists ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Complications ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Important Indicator ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Post Hoc

Blood pressure (BP) is a highly variable physiological indicator. Most people have BP changes within 40-50 mmHg during the day. Various external factors (from the patient’s position during BP measurement to poor adherence to therapy and abuse of short-acting antihypertensive drugs) affect the assessed indicators. Evaluation of the average daily, intra-visit, as well as long-term ("from visit to visit") BP variability is used in clinical practice. In the past twenty years a number of major studies demonstrated that increased BP variability is an independent prognostic factor that increases the risk of cardiovascular complications. The largest meta-analysis of 41 studies showed that an increase in long-term BP variability was associated with 15% and 18% increase in total and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. According to the IDHOCO project, the threshold coefficient of variation for day-today variability is >11.0/12.8. Different groups of antihypertensive drugs have an uneven effect on BP variability. Consistent data from ASCOT-BPLA, X-CELLENT and ACCOMPLISH studies indicate that among the main groups of antihypertensive drugs, calcium antagonists, mainly amlodipine, have the greatest potential for the variability reduction. A decrease in BP variability, as shown in a post-hoc analysis of CAMELOT and PREVENT studies, has a positive effect on the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Thus, the BP variability is an important indicator that reflects the prognosis in hypertensive patients. BP variability reduction can be considered as one of the independent goals of therapy. Calcium antagonists can be considered as first-line drugs for patients with high BP variability.

scholarly journals Higher risk of major adverse cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction in patients with schizophrenia

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001286
Author(s):  
Rubina Attar ◽  
Axel Wester ◽  
Sasha Koul ◽  
Svend Eggert ◽  
Christoffer Polcwiartek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
All Cause Mortality

BackgroundPatients with schizophrenia are a high-risk population due to higher prevalences of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities that contribute to shorter life expectancy.PurposeTo investigate patients with and without schizophrenia experiencing an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in relation to guideline recommended in-hospital management, discharge medications and 5-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE: composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalisation for reinfarction, stroke or heart failure).MethodsAll patients with schizophrenia who experienced AMI during 2000–2018 were identified (n=1008) from the nationwide Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies registry and compared with AMI patients without schizophrenia (n=2 85 325). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare the populations.ResultsPatients with schizophrenia presented with AMI approximately 10 years earlier (median age 64 vs 73 years), and had higher prevalences of diabetes, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. They were less likely to be invasively investigated or discharged with aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers and statins (all p<0.005). AMI patients with schizophrenia had higher adjusted risk of MACE (aHR=2.05, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.58), mortality (aHR=2.38, 95% CI 1.84 to 3.09) and hospitalisation for heart failure (aHR=1.39, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.86) compared with AMI patients without schizophrenia.ConclusionPatients with schizophrenia experienced an AMI almost 10 years earlier than patients without schizophrenia. They less often underwent invasive procedures and were less likely to be treated with guideline recommended medications at discharge, and had more than doubled risk of MACE and all-cause mortality. Improved primary and secondary preventive measures, including adherence to guideline recommendations, are warranted and may improve outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document