The Association of Febuxostat Compared With Allopurinol on Blood Pressure and Major Adverse Cardiac Events Among Adult Patients With Hyperuricemia: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Barrientos-Regala ◽  
Renelene A. Macabeo ◽  
Rosemarie Ramirez-Ragasa ◽  
Noemi S. Pestaño ◽  
Felix E. R. Punzalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

P276 A meta-analysis on the association of febuxostat compared to allopurinol on blood pressure and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among adult patients with hyperuricemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Barrientos ◽  
R A Macabeo ◽  
R A Ragasa
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Increased uric acid levels have been known to be associated with different cardiovascular and renal diseases.  Over the last few years, several studies have examined the role of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in hypertension and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and results are pointing to a potential role of elevated serum uric acid as an emerging independent cardiovascular risk factor. Objective  To determine if urate-lowering therapy (Febuxostat vs Allopurinol) has an association on blood pressure and MACE among adult patients with hyperuricemia. Methodology Randomized controlled trials with outcomes of blood pressure, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were searched through PubMed and Cochrane database. Results Pooled analysis of studies on hyperuricemic patients showed that Febuxostat 40 mg has no significant difference compared with Allopurinol 100/300mg with respect to lowering diastolic (MD -0.56 with 95% CI of -4.28 to 3.15) and systolic blood pressure (MD -0.72 with 95% CI of -4.87 to 6.31).  No significant differences were also noted on all-cause mortality (OR 1.21 with 95% CI of 0.35 to 4.12) and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.38 with 95% CI of 0.19 to 9.94). Outcomes on non-fatal stroke were only reported by Becker, et. al (2010) with only 2 events reported in the Febuxostat 80 mg group (0.26%) and no event in the Allopurinol group (CI= 0.082 to 1.155). Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis showed that urate-lowering therapy (Febuxostat vs Allopurinol) has no significant association on blood pressure among adult patients with hyperuricemia.  No significant association was also found with respect to all-cause mortality and MI. Outcomes on stroke were inconclusive since only one study reported on its events.

scholarly journals Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Mortality Associated with Electroconvulsive Therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Duma ◽  
Mathias Maleczek ◽  
Basil Panjikaran ◽  
Harald Herkner ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Total N ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

Abstract EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE What We Already Know about This Topic The incidence of major adverse cardiac events after electroconvulsive therapy is not known What This Article Tells Us That Is New Major adverse cardiac events and death after electroconvulsive therapy are infrequent and occur in about 1 of 50 patients and after about 1 of 200 to 500 electroconvulsive therapy treatments Background Cardiac events after electroconvulsive therapy have been reported sporadically, but a systematic assessment of the risk is missing. The goal of this study was to obtain a robust estimate of the incidence of major adverse cardiac events in adult patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that investigated electroconvulsive therapy and reported major adverse cardiac events and/or mortality. Endpoints were incidence rates of major adverse cardiac events, including myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, acute heart failure, and cardiac arrest. Additional endpoints were all-cause and cardiac mortality. The pooled estimated incidence rates and 95% CIs of individual major adverse cardiac events and mortality per 1,000 patients and per 1,000 electroconvulsive therapy treatments were calculated. Results After screening of 2,641 publications and full-text assessment of 284 studies, the data of 82 studies were extracted (total n = 106,569 patients; n = 786,995 electroconvulsive therapy treatments). The most commonly reported major adverse cardiac events were acute heart failure, arrhythmia, and acute pulmonary edema with an incidence (95% CI) of 24 (12.48 to 46.13), 25.83 (14.83 to 45.00), and 4.92 (0.85 to 28.60) per 1,000 patients or 2.44 (1.27 to 4.69), 4.66 (2.15 to 10.09), and 1.50 (0.71 to 3.14) per 1,000 electroconvulsive therapy treatments. All-cause mortality was 0.42 (0.11 to 1.52) deaths per 1,000 patients and 0.06 (0.02 to 0.23) deaths per 1,000 electroconvulsive therapy treatments. Cardiac death accounted for 29% (23 of 79) of deaths. Conclusions Major adverse cardiac events and death after electroconvulsive therapy are infrequent and occur in about 1 of 50 patients and after about 1 of 200 to 500 electroconvulsive therapy treatments.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Double Antithrombotic Therapy With Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Capodanno ◽  
Marco Di Maio ◽  
Antonio Greco ◽  
Deepak L. Bhatt ◽  
C. Michael Gibson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Background The optimal antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is a topic of debate. We aimed at defining the efficacy and safety of double antithrombotic therapy with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus a non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) against triple antithrombotic therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) added to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), illustrating the pooled cumulative distribution of events, the ranking of different NOACs tested in NOAC+SAPT combination strategies, and the state of the current evidence in the field. Methods and Results Randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of trial‐defined major adverse cardiac events. The primary safety end point was clinically significant bleeding. Secondary end points were the components of primary end points. Trial‐level pairwise and Bayesian network meta‐analyses, reconstructed Kaplan–Meier analyses, and trial sequential analysis were performed. Four randomized controlled trials (10 969 patients) were included. No differences were found in terms of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94–1.22), and the NOAC+SAPT strategy showed a lower rate of clinically significant bleeding compared with VKA + DAPT (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39–0.80). These results were consistent in reconstructed Kaplan–Meier analyses. In the Bayesian network meta‐analysis, different NOACs displayed diverse risk–benefit profiles. Trial sequential analyses suggest that the evidence for the similarity in major adverse cardiac events compared with VKA + DAPT and the bleeding risk reduction observed with NOAC+SAPT is likely to be conclusive. Conclusions NOAC+SAPT does not increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events and reduces the risk of bleeding compared with VKA + DAPT in AF patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Various NOACs may have different risk–benefit profiles in combination strategies. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ; Unique identifier: CRD42020151089.

scholarly journals The HEART score for early rule out of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Van Den Berg ◽  
Richard Body
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Heart Score ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

Aims: The objective of this systematic review was to summarise the current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the HEART score for predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain to the emergency department. Methods and results: Two investigators independently searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases between 2008 and May 2016 identifying eligible studies providing diagnostic accuracy data on the HEART score for predicting major adverse cardiac events as the primary outcome. For the 12 studies meeting inclusion criteria, study characteristics and diagnostic accuracy measures were systematically extracted and study quality assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. After quality assessment, nine studies including data from 11,217 patients were combined in the meta-analysis applying a generalised linear mixed model approach with random effects assumption (Stata 13.1). In total, 15.4% of patients (range 7.3–29.1%) developed major adverse cardiac events after a mean of 6 weeks’ follow-up. Among patients categorised as ‘low risk’ and suitable for early discharge (HEART score 0–3), the pooled incidence of ‘missed’ major adverse cardiac events was 1.6%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the HEART score for predicting major adverse cardiac events were 96.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.0–98.2%) and 47.0% (95% CI 41.0–53.5%), respectively. Conclusions: Patients with a HEART score of 0–3 are at low risk of incident major adverse cardiac events. As 3.3% of patients with major adverse cardiac events are ‘missed’ by the HEART score, clinicians must ask whether this risk is acceptably low for clinical implementation.

scholarly journals Post-Operative Blood Pressure in 24 Hours and 3-Year Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Chinese Patients Undergoing PCI

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Gan ◽  
Dandan Sun ◽  
Yuntao Cheng ◽  
Deyang Wang ◽  
Fen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Inflection Point ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Average Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Non Linear

Abstract Background: There is no clear evidence for the target value of blood pressure control within 24 hours after Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, our study was designed to explore the relationship between blood pressure within 24 hours after PCI and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 3-year follow-up. Methods: This study is a prospective study. The study initially collected information of 552 patients. The start and end times of the study are from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020. The independent variables of this study are the average systolic blood pressure and the average diastolic blood pressure within 24 hours after PCI. The dependent variable is the occurrence of MACE events in patients within 3 years after PCI. Results: A total of 514 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The average age of the study subjects is 61.92 ± 9.49 years old, of which 67.12% are male. 94 subjects had a MACE event within 3 years, and the occurrence rate was 18.29%. There is no significant non-linear or linear relationship between diastolic blood pressure and MACE events. There is a curvilinear relationship between the average systolic blood pressure within 24 hours of patients after PCI and MACE events within 3 years and the inflection point is 134. On the left side of the inflection point, the effect size and 95% CI are 1.22 and 1.04-1.43, respectively (P=0.017). The impact size and 95% CI at the right inflection point were 0.96 and 0.83-1.11, respectively (P=0.604). Conclusion: There is a non-linear relationship between systolic blood pressure and the occurrence of MACE events in 3 years, and its inflection point is 134mmHg. In the case of ensuring patient safety, we should control the patient's systolic blood pressure within 24 hours after surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document