scholarly journals 1161Efficacy of non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants for perioperative complication in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

EP Europace ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii247-iii247
Author(s):  
T. Iseda ◽  
K. Hiroshima ◽  
M. Nagashima ◽  
J. Morita ◽  
S. Tohoku ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirosuke Yamaji ◽  
Takashi Murakami ◽  
Kazuyoshi Hina ◽  
Shunichi Higashiya ◽  
Hiroshi Kawamura ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhanderson Cardoso ◽  
Stephan Willems ◽  
Edward P. Gerstenfeld ◽  
Atul Verma ◽  
Richard Schilling ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (19) ◽  
pp. 1531-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Tae Yu ◽  
Jaemin Shim ◽  
Junbeom Park ◽  
Tae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Jae-Sun Uhm ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Although a recent expert consensus statement has recommended periprocedural uninterrupted (UI) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) as a Class I indication, there have been no clear randomized trials. We investigated the safety and efficacy of UI, procedure day single-dose skipped (SDS), and 24-hour skipped (24S) NOACs in patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods and results In this prospective, open-label, randomized multicentre trial, 326 patients (75% male, 58 ± 11 years old) scheduled for AF catheter ablation were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to UI, SDS, and 24S at three tertiary hospitals. Bridging with low molecular weight heparin was carried out in the patients with persistent AF who were assigned to the 24S group. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were assigned in order after randomization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding events within 1 month after ablation. The secondary endpoints included thrombo-embolic and other procedure-related complications. The intra-procedural heparin requirement was higher in the 24S group than others (P < 0.001), and the mean activated clotting time was comparable among the groups (P = 0.139). The incidence of major bleeding up to 1 month after ablation and a post-procedural reduction in the haemoglobin levels did not significantly differ among the treatment groups and different NOACs (P > 0.05). There were no fatal events or thrombo-embolic complications in all the three groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing AF ablation, UI NOACs and SDS or double dose skipped NOACs had a comparable efficacy and safety, regardless of the type of NOAC.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Céline Martin ◽  
Anne Godier ◽  
Kumar Narayanan ◽  
David M. Smadja ◽  
Eloi Marijon

Catheter ablation has gained a prominent role in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), with recent data providing positive evidence on hard outcomes, including hospitalization and mortality. Ablation, however, exposes the patient to a rather unique situation, combining risks for both major bleeding and thromboembolic events. In this setting, the critical importance of rigorous anticoagulation during the procedure has been underlined, and the latest international guidelines now recommend performing AF catheter ablation with uninterrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and concomitant administration of unfractionated heparin adjusted to achieve and maintain a target activated clotting time of ≥300 seconds. Whereas observational studies and randomized controlled trials support the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted NOAC strategy for AF catheter ablation, recent experiences have questioned this point, showing a greater unfractionated heparin requirement in NOAC-treated patients compared with vitamin K antagonists–treated patients to achieve the target activated clotting time. Important gaps in evidence regarding optimal intraprocedural anticoagulation management need to be acknowledged. A thorough appreciation of the physiology of anticoagulation during AF catheter ablation and the relevant differences between vitamin K antagonists and NOACs is required, while also understanding the limitations of activated clotting time measurement with regard to accurate intraprocedural anticogulation monitoring. This review aims to provide a critical look at this relatively ignored aspect of AF catheter ablation, especially pitfalls in NOAC monitoring, and to identify gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed in the near future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document