scholarly journals Factors influencing adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the early period after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (16) ◽  
pp. 1989-1991
Author(s):  
Zhi-Cheng Hu ◽  
Shang-Yu Liu ◽  
Ling-Min Wu ◽  
Li-Shui Shen ◽  
Li-Min Liu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Susin Park ◽  
Nam Kyung Je

Background: Major atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, except in rare clinical circumstances based on 4 randomized controlled trials comparing each NOAC with warfarin. We aimed to investigate the current NOAC prescription behaviors in alignment with the recent clinical evidence available. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NOAC-using patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were aged ≥65 years on the index date (July 1, 2018) based on nationwide claims data. The types of NOACs being taken were analyzed using chi-squared tests, and factors influencing NOAC selection were identified using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 6,061 patients were included. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used NOAC. Patients aged ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.270, confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-1.450) and women (OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284) were more likely to use apixaban relative to rivaroxaban. Patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism had higher odds of using dabigatran (OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704) and apixaban (OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346). Patients with renal disease had higher odds of using apixaban (OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693). These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs. Conclusion: Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most commonly used NOAC. Apixaban was preferred for patients aged ≥75 years, females, and patients with renal disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirosuke Yamaji ◽  
Takashi Murakami ◽  
Kazuyoshi Hina ◽  
Shunichi Higashiya ◽  
Hiroshi Kawamura ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhanderson Cardoso ◽  
Stephan Willems ◽  
Edward P. Gerstenfeld ◽  
Atul Verma ◽  
Richard Schilling ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (19) ◽  
pp. 1531-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Tae Yu ◽  
Jaemin Shim ◽  
Junbeom Park ◽  
Tae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Jae-Sun Uhm ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Although a recent expert consensus statement has recommended periprocedural uninterrupted (UI) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) as a Class I indication, there have been no clear randomized trials. We investigated the safety and efficacy of UI, procedure day single-dose skipped (SDS), and 24-hour skipped (24S) NOACs in patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods and results In this prospective, open-label, randomized multicentre trial, 326 patients (75% male, 58 ± 11 years old) scheduled for AF catheter ablation were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to UI, SDS, and 24S at three tertiary hospitals. Bridging with low molecular weight heparin was carried out in the patients with persistent AF who were assigned to the 24S group. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were assigned in order after randomization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding events within 1 month after ablation. The secondary endpoints included thrombo-embolic and other procedure-related complications. The intra-procedural heparin requirement was higher in the 24S group than others (P < 0.001), and the mean activated clotting time was comparable among the groups (P = 0.139). The incidence of major bleeding up to 1 month after ablation and a post-procedural reduction in the haemoglobin levels did not significantly differ among the treatment groups and different NOACs (P > 0.05). There were no fatal events or thrombo-embolic complications in all the three groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing AF ablation, UI NOACs and SDS or double dose skipped NOACs had a comparable efficacy and safety, regardless of the type of NOAC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document