Acute necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis presented as an acute coronary syndrome

Author(s):  
Clothilde Berger ◽  
Sara Boccalini ◽  
Anne Champagnac ◽  
Michel Ovize ◽  
Thomas Bochaton
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Li ◽  
L Wu

Abstract Background Eosinophilic Myocarditis (EM) is a rare but potentially fatal form of myocardial inflammation, characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the myocardium. Due to its rare occurrence, there has been no descriptive study of EM on the population level. Purpose Our study aims to use a large national database to describe the prevalence, associated clinical conditions and hospital outcomes of EM. Methods We analyzed the 2016 National Inpatient Sample Database (NIS) for all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of EM. Prevalence and baseline characteristics of EM were described and compared with non-EM admissions, as well as associated clinical conditions. Results In 2016, there were 170 admissions with a diagnosis of EM. Among those, White represented the major ethnic group, followed by African American, Asian/Pacific Islander/Native American, and Hispanic (Fig. 1). There was no significant gender predisposition to EM, but EM patients presented at an older age compared with the general population. The prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Myeloproliferative disorders, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Heart Failure, Arrhythmia, Heart Transplant, Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis, Eosinophilia was significantly higher in EM patients. Also, EM patients had higher mortality. (Table 1) Table 1. A comparison of EM and Non-EM EM (n=170) Non-EM (n=35,675,421) P-value Demographic   Age, years 61.53±2.93 49.00±0.19 P=0.007   Female, % 50.00±7.80 56.72±0.10 P=0.38 Clinical Conditions   Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, % 2.94±2.74 0.50±0.01 P=0.03   Myeloproliferative Disorder, % 8.82±4.33 0.52±0.01 P<0.001   Acute Coronary Syndrome, % 20.59±6.07 6.55±0.06 P<0.001   Heart Failure, % 61.76±9.42 13.29±0.10 P<0.001   Arrhythmia, % 14.71±7.25 2.44±0.03 P<0.001   Heart Transplant, % 2.94±2.84 0.06±0.005 P<0.001   EGPA, % 2.94±2.92 0.00±0.00 P<0.001   Eosinophilia, % 5.88±3.95 0.07±0.002 P<0.001 Outcome   Mortality, % 8.82±4.83 1.91±0.02 P=0.003 Data is presented in the format of the mean ± standard error. Figure 1. Racial distribution of EM patients Conclusion(s) Eosinophilic Myocarditis is rare, and it's associated with autoimmune diseases, cardiac complications, and worse hospital outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. K1-K6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Tran ◽  
Chun Shing Kwok ◽  
Sadie Bennett ◽  
Karim Ratib ◽  
Grant Heatlie ◽  
...  

Summary A 62-year-old female was admitted with severe left-sided chest pain, nausea and pre-syncope. She had widespread T wave inversion on ECG and elevated troponins and was suspected to have an acute coronary syndrome event. Invasive coronary angiogram revealed normal coronary anatomy with no flow-limiting lesions. Echocardiography and cardiac MRI revealed impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic impairment, a mobile LV apical thrombus and a moderate global pericardial effusion with no significant compromise. Full blood count analysis indicated the patient to have significant eosinophilia, and the patient was diagnosed with idiopathic eosinophilic myocarditis. She was commenced on Prednisolone and Apixaban, and eosinophil levels returned to normal after 10 days of steroids. Over the course of 3 months, the patient had a complete recovery of her LV function and resolution of the LV thrombus. This case highlights a rare, reversible case of idiopathic eosinophilic myocarditis which may present similar to acute coronary syndrome. Learning points: Eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) is a rare disease that can exhibit symptoms similar to acute coronary syndrome events. The diagnosis of EM should be considered in patients with chest pain, normal coronary angiogram and pronounced eosinophilia levels. Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic tool; however, it has a low sensitivity detection rate and its use is not indicated in some patients. Echocardiography is useful in the initial detection of cardiac involvement and complications. However, echocardiography lacks diagnostic specificity for all forms of myocarditis including EM. Cardiac magnetic resonance is a useful method and may add in diagnosing all forms of myocarditis including EM. Patients with EM should be identified promptly and treated with high doses of oral glucocorticoid to reduce the risk of permanent cardiac dysfunction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 121-122
Author(s):  
Mukhyaprana Prabhu ◽  
Shyny Reddy ◽  
Ranjan Shetty ◽  
V.B. Mohan ◽  
Weena Stanley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document