scholarly journals 621 Anemia and its impact on clinical, echocardiographic parameters and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Beladan ◽  
A Calin ◽  
A D Mateescu ◽  
M Rosca ◽  
R Enache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters ◽  
Study Population

Abstract Background Anemia is common in patients (pts) with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Untreated anemia and severe AS are individually associated with the development of heart failure, however data regarding the potential detrimental effect of anemia on left ventricular (LV) function and prognosis in pts with severe AS are controversial. Aim To investigate the impact of anemia on clinical status, echocardiographic parameters and prognosis in pts with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods Consecutive patients with severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2) and preserved LVEF (>50%) referred to our echocardiography laboratory were prospectively screened. All patients underwent complete clinical examination and comprehensive echocardiography, including speckle tracking-derived measurements of LV and left atrial (LA) strain. Baseline clinical variables included NYHA class, cardiac risk factors, haemoglobin (Hb) level and glomerular filtration rates (GFR, by MDRD formula). The definition of anemia was based on gender-specific cut-off values, as recommended by the WHO (Hb <13.0 g/dL for men, <12.0 g/dL for women). Patients with more than mild aortic regurgitation or mitral valve disease, atrial fibrillation or cardiac pacemakers were excluded. Results The study population included 264 patients (pts) (66 ± 11 yrs, 147 men). Anemia was present in 64 pts (24%). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 151 pts. Dividing the study population into 2 groups, according to the presence/absence of anemia, no significant differences were found between groups regarding: age (p = 0.09), body surface area (p = 0.6), LVEF (62 ± 7 vs 63 ± 6%, p = 0.2), LV Global Longitudinal Strain (-15.2 ± 4 vs -14.7 ± 3 %, p = 0.4), LV mass index (p = 0.9), mean aortic gradient (p = 0.2) and indexed AVA (0.40 ± 0.09 vs 0.39 ± 0.09 cm2/m2, p = 0.6), or presence of significant coronary artery disease (p = 0.9). Compared to pts with normal Hb level, in pts with anemia NYHA class (p = 0.03), brain natriuretic peptide values (p = 0.004), lateral E/e’(16.2 ± 6.9 vs 13.7 ± 6.3, p = 0.01) and average E/e" ratio (15.9 ± 5.9 vs 14.1 ± 5.3, p = 0.03), LA volume index (54.3 ± 16.9 vs 45.0 ± 12.1 ml/m2, p < 0.001), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (38 ± 13 vs 33 ± 8, p = 0.009) were all significantly higher. During a 3–years follow-up 47 pts died. Age, NYHA class, BNP serum level, baseline anemia, LA volume index and systolic pulmonary pressure were associated with all-cause mortality in the whole study group (p < 0.03 for all). In the group of pts who underwent AVR, NYHA class was the only independent predictor of all-cause mortality. Conclusions In our study including pts with severe AS and preserved LVEF, patients with baseline anemia presented worse functional status and LV diastolic dysfunction and increased 3-year all-cause mortality compared to those with normal Hb levels. However, in pts who underwent surgical AVR, there was no impact of baseline anemia on 3-year survival.

Abstract 12459: Is Ejection Fraction <50% the Optimal Threshold for Referral for Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis? Impact of Ejection Fraction on Post-Operative Outcome

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi S Dahl ◽  
Mackram F Eleid ◽  
Hector Michelena ◽  
Christopher Scott ◽  
Rakesh Suri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Optimal Threshold ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: In asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) <50% is generally considered to be the threshold for referral for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Hypothesis: We investigated the importance of LVEF on long-term outcome after AVR in symptomatic and asymptomatic SAS patients and studied whether LVEF < 50% is the optimal threshold for referral for AVR. Methods and Results: We retrospectively identified 2017 patients with SAS (aortic valve area (AVA)<1cm2, mean aortic valve gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or indexed AVA <0.6 cm2/m2) who underwent surgical AVR from January 1995 to June 2009 at our institution. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on preoperative LVEF (<50% in 300 (15%) patients, 50-59% in 331 (17%), 60-69% in 908 (45%), and ≥70% in 478 (24%)). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. During follow-up of 5.3±4.4 years, 1056 (52%) died. Five-year mortality rate increased with decreasing LVEF (41% (n=106), LVEF<50%); 35% (n=98), LVEF 50-59%; 26% (n=192), LVEF 60-69%; 22% (n=90), LVEF≥70%, p<0.0001). Compared to patients with LVEF≥60%, patients with LVEF 50-59% had increased mortality (HR 1.58, p<0.001), with a similar risk increase in both symptomatic (HR=1.56, p<0.001) and asymptomatic patients (HR 1.58, p=0.006, Figure). In a Cox regression analysis corrected for standard risk factors, LV mass index, AVA, and stroke volume index, LVEF was predictive of all-cause mortality (HR=0.89 per 10%, p<0.001). When this multivariable analysis was repeated in the subset of 1333 patients with no history of coronary artery disease, LVEF was still associated with all-cause mortality (HR=0.90 per 10%, p=0.009). Conclusion: In patients with SAS undergoing AVR, patients with LVEF 50-59% have also increased mortality compared to patients with LVEF>60%, suggesting that a different LVEF threshold should be used when referring for AVR.

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Chew ◽  
N Ngiam ◽  
B.Y.Q Tan ◽  
C.H Sia ◽  
H.W Sim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) plays an important role in risk stratifying and guiding therapy for patients with aortic stenosis (AS). This study aims to describe the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of AS patients with preserved (ASpEF), mid-range (ASmrEF) and reduced (ASrEF) EF. Methods 713 consecutive patients with index echocardiographic diagnosis of moderate-severe AS (aortic valve area &lt;1.5cm2) were allocated according to the EF into three groups: ASrEF (EF&lt;40%), ASmrEF (EF 40–50%), and ASpEF (EF&gt;50%). The study outcomes were defined as 5-year all-cause mortality, heart failure admissions, and aortic valve replacement (AVR). Results In comparison to patients with ASpEF, those with ASrEF were more frequently male, and systolic blood pressure was significantly lower on enrolment (p&lt;0.001). Diabetes, ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation were more commonly seen in the ASrEF and ASmrEF groups, compared to ASpEF group. All-cause mortality rates were 30.5% for ASpEF, 50.8% for ASmrEF, 55.0% for ASrEF groups (p&lt;0.001). Increased rates of heart failure admissions were seen in the ASmrEF and ASrEF groups (30.5% and 33.9%, respectively, vs. 14.9% in ASpEF group). Patients with ASrEF had significantly higher rates of AVR as compared to those in the ASmrEF and ASpEF groups (p=0.032). Conclusion Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of ASmrEF patients resembled those of ASrEF more closely than the ASpEF patients. Stratifying AS patients according to the different EF groups may improve risk assessment and treatment strategies. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Risk prediction in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and reduced ejection fraction undergoing TAVI

Open Heart ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001912
Author(s):  
Sebastian Ludwig ◽  
Alina Goßling ◽  
Moritz Seiffert ◽  
Dirk Westermann ◽  
Jan-Malte Sinning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Score System ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectivePatients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG AS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are known to suffer from poor prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to develop a simple score system for risk prediction in this vulnerable subset of patients.MethodsAll patients with LFLG AS with reduced EF and sufficient CT data for aortic valve calcification (AVC) quantification, who underwent TAVI at five German centres, were retrospectively included. The Risk prEdiction in patients with Low Ejection Fraction low gradient aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI (RELiEF TAVI) score was developed based on multivariable Cox regression for all-cause mortality.ResultsAmong all included patients (n=718), RELiEF TAVI score variables were defined as independent predictors of mortality: male sex (HR 1.34 (1.06, 1.68), p=0.013), underweight (HR 3.10 (1.50, 6.40), p=0.0022), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.55 (1.21, 1.99), p=0.001), pulmonary hypertension (HR 1.51 (1.17, 1.94), p=0.0015), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.28 (1.03, 1.60), p=0.028), stroke volume index (HR 0.96 (0.95, 0.98), p<0.001), non-transfemoral access (HR 1.36 (1.05, 1.76), p=0.021) and low AVC density (HR 1.44 (1.15, 1.79), p=0.0012). A score system was developed ranging from 0 to 12 points (risk of 1-year mortality: 13%–99%). Kaplan-Meier analysis for low (0–1 points), moderate (2–4 points) and high RELiEF TAVI score (>4 points) demonstrated rates of 18.0%, 29.0% and 46.1% (p<0.001) for all-cause mortality and 23.8%, 35.9% and 53.4% (p<0.001) for the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalisation after 1 year, respectively.ConclusionsThe RELiEF TAVI score is based on simple clinical, echocardiographic and CT parameters and might serve as a helpful tool for risk prediction in patients with LFLG AS and reduced LVEF scheduled for TAVI.

scholarly journals The impact of aortic valve replacement on survival in patients with normal flow low gradient severe aortic stenosis: a propensity-matched comparison

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1094-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahrai Saeed ◽  
Anastasia Vamvakidou ◽  
Reinhard Seifert ◽  
Rajdeep Khattar ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Normal Flow ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Aims To assess the survival benefit of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with normal flow low gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods and results A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 276 patients (mean age 75 ± 15 years, 51% male) with normal transaortic flow [flow rate (FR) ≥200 mL/s or stroke volume index (SVi) ≥35 mL/m2] and severe AS (aortic valve area <1.0 cm2). The outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Of the 276 patients, 151 (55%) were medically treated, while 125 (45%) underwent an AVR. Over a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 1.8 years (range 0–6.9 years), a total of 96 (34.8%) deaths occurred: 17 (13.6%) in AVR group vs. 79 (52.3%) in those medically treated, when transaortic flow was defined by FR (P < 0.001). When transaortic flow was defined by SVi, a total of 79 (31.3%) deaths occurred: 18 (15.1%) in AVR group vs. 61 (45.9%) in medically treated (P < 0.001). In a propensity-matched multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, gender, body surface area, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, and mean aortic gradient, not having AVR was associated with a 6.3-fold higher hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality [HR 6.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.34–13.16; P < 0.001] when flow was defined by FR. In the SVi-guided model, it was 3.83-fold (HR 3.83, 95% CI 2.30–6.37; P < 0.001). Conclusion In patients with normal flow low gradient severe AS, AVR was associated with a significantly improved survival compared with those who received standard medical treatment.

Prognostic value of global longitudinal layer specific strain for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Johnsen ◽  
M Sengeloev ◽  
P Joergensen ◽  
N Bruun ◽  
D Modin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters

Abstract Background Novel echocardiographic software allows for layer-specific evaluation of myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Endocardial, epicardial- and whole wall global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of endocardial-, epicardial- and whole wall GLS in patients with HFrEF in relation to all-cause mortality. Methods We included and analyzed transthoracic echocardiographic examinations from 1,015 patients with HFrEF. The echocardiographic images were analyzed, and conventional and novel echocardiographic parameters were obtained. A p value in a 2-sided test &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed, and both univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Results During a median follow-up time of 40 months, 171 patients (16.8%) died. A lower endocardial (HR 1.17; 95% CI (1.11–1.23), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), epicardial (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.13–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), and whole wall (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.14–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001) GLS were all associated with higher risk of death (Figure 1). Both endocardial (HR 1.12; 95% CI (1.01–1.23), p=0.027), epicardial (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.26), p=0.040) and whole wall (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.27), p=0.030) GLS remained independent predictors of mortality in the multivariable models after adjusting for significant clinical parameters (age, sex, total cholesterol, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, ischemic cardiomyopathy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and diabetes) and conventional echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV mass index, left atrial volume index, deceleration time, E/e', E-velocity, E/A ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion). No other echocardiographic parameters remained an independent predictors after adjusting. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS had the highest C-statistics of all the echocardiographic parameters. Conclusion Endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS were superior prognosticators of all-cause mortality compared with all other echocardiographic parameters. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

P3694Discordant criteria in moderate aortic stenosis patients: prognostic implications

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S M Pio ◽  
M R Amanullah ◽  
K Y Sin ◽  
N Ajmone Marsan ◽  
Z P Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Filling Pressure ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
P Value ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background The frequency of discordant mean valve gradient (MG) and aortic valve area (AVA) in patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) has not been investigated. Objectives Determine the occurrence of discordant gradient in patients with moderate AS (defined by MG <20 mmHg), and how these patients compare with concordant gradient moderate AS (MG >20 mmHg) in terms of patients' characteristics and the impact on long term prognosis. Methods Based on the echocardiographic findings at the time of diagnosis of moderate AS (valve area >1.0 and ≤1.5 cm2), they were re-classified into discordant or concordant gradients, MG <20 mmHg or >20 mmHg, respectively. The clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results Of 522 patients with moderate AS, 95 (18.2%) had discordant gradient moderate AS (MG <20 mmHg). Patients with discordant mean gradient were older, had higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarct, larger left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume index, lower LV ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume index and higher LV filling pressure. Compared to patients with concordant gradients, these patients had higher mortality rates (57.9% vs 46.6%, p=0.05) and lower aortic valve replacement rates (33.7% vs 54.9%, p<0.001) during a median follow-up of 6.2 [IQR 3.2–9.0] years. The results of Cox regression analysis are shown on the table. Cox proportional hazard analysis All-cause mortality Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Age (per 1 year increase) 1.05 (1.03–1.06) <0.001 1.04 (1.02–1.06) <0.001 Diabetes (yes/no) 1.34 (1.03–1.74) 0.031 1.33 (0.97–1.82) 0.072 Previous myocardial infarction (yes/no) 1.73 (1.29–2.34) <0.001 1.01 (0.70–1.46) 0.980 eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 (yes/no) 2.15 (1.68–2.76) <0.001 1.71 (1.25–2.33) 0.001 Left ventricular hypertrophy (yes/no) 1.74 (1.31–2.30) <0.001 1.50 (1.07–2.09) 0.018 Indexed LA volume (per 1 mL/m2 increase) 1.005 (1.001–1.009) 0.008 1.006 (1.001–1.012) 0.040 Tricuspid regurgitation >moderate (yes/no) 2.02 (1.29–3.16) 0.002 1.36 (0.73–2.54) 0.337 Discordant moderate AS (yes/no) 1.81 (1.34–2.45) <0.001 1.42 (1.01–2.01) 0.049 AS, aortic stenosis; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio; LA, Left atrial. Conclusion Discrepant aortic mean gradient in moderate AS is not uncommon and occurs more often in older patients, with higher LV filling pressure and lower EF and stroke volume index. The lower gradient values lead to underestimation of AS severity, and is associated with greater cardiac extra-valvular damage and higher mortality.

Demographic characteristics, aortic valve intervention rates and all-cause mortality in 4 flow-gradient sub-types of severe aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Saeed ◽  
A Vamvakidou ◽  
H.Y Yakupoglu ◽  
R Senior ◽  
R.S Khattar
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Flow Gradient ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Introduction Severe aortic stenosis (AS), defined as aortic valve area (AVA) &lt;1.0 cm2, can be divided into 4 categories based on flow status and mean gradient. Stroke volume index &lt;35 ml/m2 has classically been used to define low flow, but recent data suggest that flow rate (FR) &lt;200ml/sec may be a more accurate and robust marker of low flow. Methods We prospectively collected demographic, echocardiographic, aortic valve intervention (AVI) and all-cause mortality data on 1562 patients with symptomatic severe AS from 2010 to 2017 with a mean follow up period of 35±22 months. Patients were divided into 4 flow-gradient sub-groups based on a FR threshold of 200ml/s and mean pressure gradient of 40mmHg. Comparative analyses were performed among the 4 groups using analysis of variance. Results The prevalence of normal flow high gradient (NFHG) severe AS was 30%, NF low gradient (NFLG) 21%, low flow HG (LFHG) 18% and LFLG 31% (Table). Across these 4 sub-groups, there was a graded reduction in LVEF and FR, and an increase in age and all–cause mortality. Conclusions Classification of aortic stenosis based on flow-gradient patterns, shows important differences in the demographic profile and clinical outcome among the 4 groups. Classical NFHG AS was associated with the highest rate of AVI and lowest all-cause mortality compared to the 3 discordant flow-gradient subtypes. The LFLG group had the lowest AVI rates and worst outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document