Abstract 12459: Is Ejection Fraction <50% the Optimal Threshold for Referral for Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis? Impact of Ejection Fraction on Post-Operative Outcome

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi S Dahl ◽  
Mackram F Eleid ◽  
Hector Michelena ◽  
Christopher Scott ◽  
Rakesh Suri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Optimal Threshold ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: In asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) <50% is generally considered to be the threshold for referral for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Hypothesis: We investigated the importance of LVEF on long-term outcome after AVR in symptomatic and asymptomatic SAS patients and studied whether LVEF < 50% is the optimal threshold for referral for AVR. Methods and Results: We retrospectively identified 2017 patients with SAS (aortic valve area (AVA)<1cm2, mean aortic valve gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or indexed AVA <0.6 cm2/m2) who underwent surgical AVR from January 1995 to June 2009 at our institution. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on preoperative LVEF (<50% in 300 (15%) patients, 50-59% in 331 (17%), 60-69% in 908 (45%), and ≥70% in 478 (24%)). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. During follow-up of 5.3±4.4 years, 1056 (52%) died. Five-year mortality rate increased with decreasing LVEF (41% (n=106), LVEF<50%); 35% (n=98), LVEF 50-59%; 26% (n=192), LVEF 60-69%; 22% (n=90), LVEF≥70%, p<0.0001). Compared to patients with LVEF≥60%, patients with LVEF 50-59% had increased mortality (HR 1.58, p<0.001), with a similar risk increase in both symptomatic (HR=1.56, p<0.001) and asymptomatic patients (HR 1.58, p=0.006, Figure). In a Cox regression analysis corrected for standard risk factors, LV mass index, AVA, and stroke volume index, LVEF was predictive of all-cause mortality (HR=0.89 per 10%, p<0.001). When this multivariable analysis was repeated in the subset of 1333 patients with no history of coronary artery disease, LVEF was still associated with all-cause mortality (HR=0.90 per 10%, p=0.009). Conclusion: In patients with SAS undergoing AVR, patients with LVEF 50-59% have also increased mortality compared to patients with LVEF>60%, suggesting that a different LVEF threshold should be used when referring for AVR.

scholarly journals 621 Anemia and its impact on clinical, echocardiographic parameters and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Beladan ◽  
A Calin ◽  
A D Mateescu ◽  
M Rosca ◽  
R Enache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters ◽  
Study Population

Abstract Background Anemia is common in patients (pts) with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Untreated anemia and severe AS are individually associated with the development of heart failure, however data regarding the potential detrimental effect of anemia on left ventricular (LV) function and prognosis in pts with severe AS are controversial. Aim To investigate the impact of anemia on clinical status, echocardiographic parameters and prognosis in pts with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods Consecutive patients with severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2) and preserved LVEF (&gt;50%) referred to our echocardiography laboratory were prospectively screened. All patients underwent complete clinical examination and comprehensive echocardiography, including speckle tracking-derived measurements of LV and left atrial (LA) strain. Baseline clinical variables included NYHA class, cardiac risk factors, haemoglobin (Hb) level and glomerular filtration rates (GFR, by MDRD formula). The definition of anemia was based on gender-specific cut-off values, as recommended by the WHO (Hb &lt;13.0 g/dL for men, &lt;12.0 g/dL for women). Patients with more than mild aortic regurgitation or mitral valve disease, atrial fibrillation or cardiac pacemakers were excluded. Results The study population included 264 patients (pts) (66 ± 11 yrs, 147 men). Anemia was present in 64 pts (24%). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 151 pts. Dividing the study population into 2 groups, according to the presence/absence of anemia, no significant differences were found between groups regarding: age (p = 0.09), body surface area (p = 0.6), LVEF (62 ± 7 vs 63 ± 6%, p = 0.2), LV Global Longitudinal Strain (-15.2 ± 4 vs -14.7 ± 3 %, p = 0.4), LV mass index (p = 0.9), mean aortic gradient (p = 0.2) and indexed AVA (0.40 ± 0.09 vs 0.39 ± 0.09 cm2/m2, p = 0.6), or presence of significant coronary artery disease (p = 0.9). Compared to pts with normal Hb level, in pts with anemia NYHA class (p = 0.03), brain natriuretic peptide values (p = 0.004), lateral E/e’(16.2 ± 6.9 vs 13.7 ± 6.3, p = 0.01) and average E/e" ratio (15.9 ± 5.9 vs 14.1 ± 5.3, p = 0.03), LA volume index (54.3 ± 16.9 vs 45.0 ± 12.1 ml/m2, p &lt; 0.001), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (38 ± 13 vs 33 ± 8, p = 0.009) were all significantly higher. During a 3–years follow-up 47 pts died. Age, NYHA class, BNP serum level, baseline anemia, LA volume index and systolic pulmonary pressure were associated with all-cause mortality in the whole study group (p &lt; 0.03 for all). In the group of pts who underwent AVR, NYHA class was the only independent predictor of all-cause mortality. Conclusions In our study including pts with severe AS and preserved LVEF, patients with baseline anemia presented worse functional status and LV diastolic dysfunction and increased 3-year all-cause mortality compared to those with normal Hb levels. However, in pts who underwent surgical AVR, there was no impact of baseline anemia on 3-year survival.

scholarly journals The impact of aortic valve replacement on survival in patients with normal flow low gradient severe aortic stenosis: a propensity-matched comparison

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1094-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahrai Saeed ◽  
Anastasia Vamvakidou ◽  
Reinhard Seifert ◽  
Rajdeep Khattar ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Normal Flow ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Aims To assess the survival benefit of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with normal flow low gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods and results A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 276 patients (mean age 75 ± 15 years, 51% male) with normal transaortic flow [flow rate (FR) ≥200 mL/s or stroke volume index (SVi) ≥35 mL/m2] and severe AS (aortic valve area <1.0 cm2). The outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Of the 276 patients, 151 (55%) were medically treated, while 125 (45%) underwent an AVR. Over a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 1.8 years (range 0–6.9 years), a total of 96 (34.8%) deaths occurred: 17 (13.6%) in AVR group vs. 79 (52.3%) in those medically treated, when transaortic flow was defined by FR (P < 0.001). When transaortic flow was defined by SVi, a total of 79 (31.3%) deaths occurred: 18 (15.1%) in AVR group vs. 61 (45.9%) in medically treated (P < 0.001). In a propensity-matched multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, gender, body surface area, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, and mean aortic gradient, not having AVR was associated with a 6.3-fold higher hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality [HR 6.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.34–13.16; P < 0.001] when flow was defined by FR. In the SVi-guided model, it was 3.83-fold (HR 3.83, 95% CI 2.30–6.37; P < 0.001). Conclusion In patients with normal flow low gradient severe AS, AVR was associated with a significantly improved survival compared with those who received standard medical treatment.

scholarly journals Early Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Conservative Management in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tan Yuan ◽  
Yi Lu ◽  
Chang Bian ◽  
Zhejun Cai
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in developed countries. Until now, the specific timing of intervention for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction remains controversial.Methods: A systematic search of four databases (Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane library, Embase) was conducted. Studies of asymptomatic patients with severe AS or very severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction underwent early aortic valve replacement (AVR) or conservative care were included. The end points included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and non-cardiac mortality.Results: Four eligible studies were identified with a total of 1,249 participants. Compared to conservative management, patients who underwent early AVR were associated with lower all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and non-cardiac mortality rate (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09–0.31, P &lt; 0.00001; OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.62, P = 0.01; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21–0.63, P = 0.0003, respectively).Conclusions: Early AVR is preferable for asymptomatic severe AS patients with preserved ejection fraction.

480Right ventricular dysfunction is associated with late mortality in severe aortic stenosis: results from a multi-centre outcome study in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Rigolli ◽  
T A Musa ◽  
T A Treibel ◽  
M Loudon ◽  
V S Vassiliou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Rv Function

Abstract Background The right ventricle (RV) is relatively understudied and often not routinely assessed in aortic stenosis (AS). However, there are several potential reasons for its importance. RV function is sensitive to left-sided afterload changes which can result in pulmonary hypertension (PH) in severe AS. PH is also a recognised predictor of poor prognosis in AS, but RV afterload and function can be difficult to assess. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may reveal unrecognised RV dysfunction and simultaneously evaluate other prognostic markers in AS. Purpose To investigate preoperative RV function assessed by CMR in severe AS and its association with mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods 674 severe AS patients listed for either surgical or percutaneous AVR at six cardiothoracic centres underwent preoperative CMR (for ventricular function, mass and scar) along with echocardiography for valve severity. Scans were core-lab analysed for LV and RV volumes, function and scar quantification. Eight patients were excluded due to inadequate RV image quality for a total of 666 patients finally included. All-cause mortality was tracked for a minimum of 2 years after AVR. Results 107 (16%) of severe AS undergoing invasive AVR had a RV ejection fraction (RVEF) <55%. CMR detected overt RV dysfunction (RVEF <50%) in 61 (9%) patients. During a median 3.6 years follow-up, 145 (22%) patients died. Baseline RV dysfunction was the most powerful predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5, 95% CI 1.6–3.9, p<0.0001). RV function was independent from other clinical characteristics but associated with signs of LV maladaptation (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] and late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]). The strongest Cox multivariable model for all-cause mortality accounted for RV dysfunction, age and LGE (adjusted HRs 1.7, 1.1, 2.2, respectively). Even early stages of pre-procedural RV dysfunction (RVEF 45–50%) were associated with reduced long-term survival. Cox and Kaplan-Meier for all-cause death Conclusion One out of 6 patients with severe AS undergoing valve replacement manifests a reduction in RV function detectable by CMR. Those with RV dysfunction (RVEF<50%) have a 2.5-fold increase in all-cause mortality after AVR at 3.6 years. Whilst RV dysfunction is associated with LV maladaptation (LGE, LVEF), it is a powerful independent factor associated with all-cause mortality and impacts survival even at early stages. Thus, the RV appears to be important in cardiac adaptation to AS and longevity after AS intervention. Acknowledgement/Funding British Heart Foundation and National Institute of Health Research

scholarly journals P301 The prognostic value of preoperative left atrial volume after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A D Mateescu ◽  
A Calin ◽  
M Rosca ◽  
C C Beladan ◽  
R Enache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) volume is an important cardiovascular prognostic marker. However, data regarding the prognostic value of LA volume in severe AS patients (pts) after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are scarce. Moreover, the predictive role of LA function in AS pts after AVR has not yet been studied. Our study aimed to assess the relationship of LA volume index (LAVi) and function with outcome, in terms of mortality, in severe AS pts who underwent surgical AVR. Methods A total of 360 consecutive pts with isolated severe AS (aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2) referred to our echocardiography laboratory were prospectively screened. Two hundred and seventeen pts with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (≥50%) and in sinus rhythm were enrolled. All patients underwent a baseline comprehensive echocardiogram, including speckle tracking analysis of both LV and LA strain. Symptomatic pts (142 pts, 65%) that were subject to AVR were followed for a median period of 4 years (IQR 3-6 years). The endpoint was all-cause mortality after AVR. The last update of the survival status was obtained in January 2019. Outcome data were available in 116 severe AS pts that underwent AVR (mean age 63 ± 10 yrs, 56% men), who formed the final study population. Results Seventeen (14%) pts died during follow-up. No significant differences were found between nonsurvivors and survivors after AVR in terms of age and cardiovascular risk factors. Nonsurvivors had higher BNP plasma values (p=.04) at baseline compared with surviving pts. Survivors and nonsurvivors alike exhibited similar preoperative AS severity and LV systolic function parameters (ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding baseline valvuloarterial impedance, average E/e’ ratio, and LA longitudinal deformation parameters. Nonsurvivors had a tendency toward higher LV mass index (p=.08). Nonsurvivors had higher preoperative LA volume index (LAVi)(50 ± 12 vs. 44 ± 10 ml/m2, p=.003). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, LAVi emerged as the only independent predictor for death in our population study (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p=.02). A cut-off value for LAVi derived from ROC curve analysis was used to construct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A value of 43 ml/m2 for LAVi predicted all-cause mortality after AVR in severe AS pts with 71% sensitivity and 54% specificity. Conclusions In our study, preoperative LAVi predicted death in severe AS pts after surgical AVR. LAVi assessment may improve preoperative risk stratification in patients with severe AS, however further larger prospective studies are needed. Abstract P301 Figure.

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Chew ◽  
N Ngiam ◽  
B.Y.Q Tan ◽  
C.H Sia ◽  
H.W Sim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) plays an important role in risk stratifying and guiding therapy for patients with aortic stenosis (AS). This study aims to describe the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of AS patients with preserved (ASpEF), mid-range (ASmrEF) and reduced (ASrEF) EF. Methods 713 consecutive patients with index echocardiographic diagnosis of moderate-severe AS (aortic valve area &lt;1.5cm2) were allocated according to the EF into three groups: ASrEF (EF&lt;40%), ASmrEF (EF 40–50%), and ASpEF (EF&gt;50%). The study outcomes were defined as 5-year all-cause mortality, heart failure admissions, and aortic valve replacement (AVR). Results In comparison to patients with ASpEF, those with ASrEF were more frequently male, and systolic blood pressure was significantly lower on enrolment (p&lt;0.001). Diabetes, ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation were more commonly seen in the ASrEF and ASmrEF groups, compared to ASpEF group. All-cause mortality rates were 30.5% for ASpEF, 50.8% for ASmrEF, 55.0% for ASrEF groups (p&lt;0.001). Increased rates of heart failure admissions were seen in the ASmrEF and ASrEF groups (30.5% and 33.9%, respectively, vs. 14.9% in ASpEF group). Patients with ASrEF had significantly higher rates of AVR as compared to those in the ASmrEF and ASpEF groups (p=0.032). Conclusion Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of ASmrEF patients resembled those of ASrEF more closely than the ASpEF patients. Stratifying AS patients according to the different EF groups may improve risk assessment and treatment strategies. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Risk prediction in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and reduced ejection fraction undergoing TAVI

Open Heart ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001912
Author(s):  
Sebastian Ludwig ◽  
Alina Goßling ◽  
Moritz Seiffert ◽  
Dirk Westermann ◽  
Jan-Malte Sinning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Score System ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectivePatients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG AS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are known to suffer from poor prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to develop a simple score system for risk prediction in this vulnerable subset of patients.MethodsAll patients with LFLG AS with reduced EF and sufficient CT data for aortic valve calcification (AVC) quantification, who underwent TAVI at five German centres, were retrospectively included. The Risk prEdiction in patients with Low Ejection Fraction low gradient aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI (RELiEF TAVI) score was developed based on multivariable Cox regression for all-cause mortality.ResultsAmong all included patients (n=718), RELiEF TAVI score variables were defined as independent predictors of mortality: male sex (HR 1.34 (1.06, 1.68), p=0.013), underweight (HR 3.10 (1.50, 6.40), p=0.0022), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.55 (1.21, 1.99), p=0.001), pulmonary hypertension (HR 1.51 (1.17, 1.94), p=0.0015), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.28 (1.03, 1.60), p=0.028), stroke volume index (HR 0.96 (0.95, 0.98), p<0.001), non-transfemoral access (HR 1.36 (1.05, 1.76), p=0.021) and low AVC density (HR 1.44 (1.15, 1.79), p=0.0012). A score system was developed ranging from 0 to 12 points (risk of 1-year mortality: 13%–99%). Kaplan-Meier analysis for low (0–1 points), moderate (2–4 points) and high RELiEF TAVI score (>4 points) demonstrated rates of 18.0%, 29.0% and 46.1% (p<0.001) for all-cause mortality and 23.8%, 35.9% and 53.4% (p<0.001) for the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalisation after 1 year, respectively.ConclusionsThe RELiEF TAVI score is based on simple clinical, echocardiographic and CT parameters and might serve as a helpful tool for risk prediction in patients with LFLG AS and reduced LVEF scheduled for TAVI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document