scholarly journals Intraoperative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve measurement with dobutamine infusion in supra-arterial myotomy for a myocardial bridge: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuichiro Yamauchi ◽  
Akihiro Hayashida ◽  
Atsushi Hirohata ◽  
Taichi Sakaguchi

Abstract Background A myocardial bridge (MB) is a congenital coronary anomaly, wherein the epicardial coronary artery tunnels through the myocardial band. Treatment is indicated when clinical symptoms occur, and β-blockers are the first choice of treatment. Symptomatic patients refractory to medical therapy are considered for other options, including stent placement, coronary artery bypass grafting, or surgical supra-arterial myotomy. Supra-arterial myotomy is effective; however, the symptoms might persist if myocardial resection is inadequately performed. Case summary We encountered a patient experiencing exertional chest pain. Coronary angiography revealed a MB at the mid-left anterior descending artery with systolic compression. The patient’s fractional flow reserves (FFRs) were 0.93 at rest and 0.72 with intravenous administration of 50 µg/kg/min dobutamine. The symptoms were refractory to drugs, and supra-arterial myotomy was performed with intraoperative coronary artery angiography, which revealed the milking effect of the residual myocardium; therefore, additional myocardial resection was performed. Postoperative coronary artery angiography showed no systolic compression, and the postoperative FFRs were 0.88 at rest and 0.92 with intravenous administration of dobutamine 50 µg/kg/min. Discussion Although surgical supra-arterial myotomy is safe and effective, inadequate myocardial resection might cause symptom recurrence. Intraoperative coronary artery angiography during the surgery can indicate whether additional resection is required. Objective assessment of ischaemia might be useful in cases with a MB, which can cause asymptomatic myocardial ischaemia and sudden cardiac death. FFRs before surgery can help in evaluating the need for surgery and for confirming the therapeutic effect and subsequent treatment.

Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 128 (13) ◽  
pp. 1405-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabor Toth ◽  
Bernard De Bruyne ◽  
Filip Casselman ◽  
Frederic De Vroey ◽  
Stylianos Pyxaras ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 1608-1609
Author(s):  
Christopher Cao ◽  
Adam Chakos ◽  
Brian Chau ◽  
Richard Szirt ◽  
Paul Bannon

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 1349-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Li ◽  
Yanjun Gong ◽  
Weimin Wang ◽  
Qing Yang ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Conventional fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured invasively using a coronary guidewire equipped with a pressure sensor. A non-invasive derived FFR would eliminate risk of coronary injury, minimize technical limitations, and potentially increase adoption. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a computational pressure-flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR), applied to coronary angiography, compared to invasive FFR. Methods and results The FLASH FFR study was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study conducted at six centres in China. Eligible patients had native coronary artery target lesions with visually estimated diameter stenosis of 30–90% and diagnosis of stable or unstable angina pectoris. Using computational pressure-fluid dynamics, in conjunction with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, applied to coronary angiography, caFFR was measured online in real-time and compared blind to conventional invasive FFR by an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was the agreement between caFFR and FFR, with a pre-specified performance goal of 84%. Between June and December 2018, matched caFFR and FFR measurements were performed in 328 coronary arteries. Total operational time for caFFR was 4.54 ± 1.48 min. caFFR was highly correlated to FFR (R = 0.89, P = 0.76) with a mean bias of −0.002 ± 0.049 (95% limits of agreement −0.098 to 0.093). The diagnostic performance of caFFR vs. FFR was diagnostic accuracy 95.7%, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 98.6%, positive predictive value 97.2%, negative predictive value 95.0%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.979. Conclusions Using wire-based FFR as the reference, caFFR has high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. caFFR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, technical error and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1800019522.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-93
Author(s):  
Pramod Kumar Kuchulakanti

The left main coronary artery (LMCA) supplies majority of the left ventricular myocardium and atherosclerotic obstruction is associated with significant myocardial jeopardy. Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has been the gold standard for LMCA disease in the past. The LMCA has special characteristics anatomically, poses different challenges with regard to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and is often associated with multivessel disease. However, advancements in technology have established PCI to be a standard, safe, and reasonable alternative to CABG with comparable outcomes. Contemporary PCI of LMCA disease includes proper selection of the patients and correct technique, and is aided by intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and physiological assessment with fractional flow reserve. In this review article, we discuss the anatomy, plaque characteristics of LMCA, current evidence from registries and randomized trials comparing with CABG, technical aspects of stent implantation, adjuvant technologies, mechanical circulatory supports, and triumph of PCI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document