scholarly journals Preoperative renal malperfusion is an independent predictor for acute kidney injury and operative death but not associated with late mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-308
Author(s):  
Kosaku Nishigawa ◽  
Toshihiro Fukui ◽  
Kohei Uemura ◽  
Shuichiro Takanashi ◽  
Tomoki Shimokawa

Abstract OBJECTIVES This study was aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative renal malperfusion on early and late outcomes after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD). METHODS Of 915 patients who underwent surgery for AAAD between September 2004 and September 2017, we enrolled 534 patients whose preoperative enhanced computed tomography images were retrospectively available in this study. Exclusion criteria were single kidney (n = 3) and dialysis-dependent preoperatively (n = 12). We compared early and late outcomes between patients who had preoperative renal malperfusion (n = 64) and those who did not have renal malperfusion (n = 470). RESULTS The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury, defined using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria, was higher in the renal malperfusion group than in the no renal malperfusion group (76.6% vs 39.4%; P < 0.001). Similarly, operative death was more frequently seen in the renal malperfusion group (12.5% vs 3.8%; P = 0.003). Multivariate analyses showed that renal malperfusion was the independent predictor for postoperative acute kidney injury [odds ratio 4.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.25–8.67; P < 0.001] and operative death (odds ratio 3.08, 95% CI 1.02–8.86; P = 0.046). The median follow-up period in the hospital survivors was 3.3 years (interquartile range 2.1–6.7 years). The cumulative survival rate at 8 years was similar between the groups (74.6% in the renal malperfusion group and 76.0% in the no renal malperfusion group; P = 0.349). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative renal malperfusion is an independent predictor for postoperative acute kidney injury and operative death but not associated with late mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 1583-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Bo Wu ◽  
Huai Qin ◽  
Wei-Guo Ma ◽  
Hong-Lei Zhao ◽  
Jun Zheng ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 815-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsu-Ming Chien ◽  
Hao Wen ◽  
Jiann-Woei Huang ◽  
Chong-Chao Hsieh ◽  
Huai-Min Chen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 2003-2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Sasabuchi ◽  
Naoyuki Kimura ◽  
Junji Shiotsuka ◽  
Tetsuya Komuro ◽  
Hideyuki Mouri ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeko M. Madjarov ◽  
Michael G. Katz ◽  
Hector Crespo-Soto ◽  
Svetozar Madzharov ◽  
Timothy Roush ◽  
...  

Acute dissection of thoracic aorta carries a risk of renal ischemia followed by the development of a kidney failure. The optimal surgical and nonsurgical management of these patients, timing of intervention, and the factors predicting renal recovery are not well delineated and remain controversial. We present a case of acute type B thoracic aortic dissection with left kidney ischemia. Evaluation of renal function was performed by the means of internationally accepted Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, End stage kidney disease and Acute Kidney Injury Network classifications for acute kidney injury, renal duplex sonography, and intravascular ultrasound that demonstrated left renal artery dissection with a flap completely compressing the true lumen. The patient underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair and left renal artery stent and recovered well. Six months later, at the follow-up visit, retrograde type A aortic dissection was found, which was successfully repaired. Reversal of renal ischemia after aortic dissection depends on the precise assessment of renal function and prompt intervention.


Author(s):  
Dadi Helgason ◽  
Solveig Helgadottir ◽  
Anders Ahlsson ◽  
Jarmo Gunn ◽  
Vibeke Hjortdal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junfeng He ◽  
Qing Ling ◽  
Yuhong Chen

Background: Postoperative delirium (POD), an alteration in a patient's consciousness pattern, can affect the treatment and prognosis of a disease.Objective: To construct a prediction model for delirium in patients with type A aortic dissection after surgery and to validate its effectiveness.Methods: A retrospective cohort design was used to study 438 patients undergoing surgical treatment for type A aortic dissection from April 2019 to June 2020 in tertiary care hospitals. POD (n = 78) and non-delirium groups (n = 360) were compared and analyzed for each index in the perioperative period. A prediction model was established using multifactorial logistic regression, and 30 patients' perioperative data were collected for model validation.Results: Eight predictors were included in this study: smoking, diabetes, previous cardiovascular surgery, ejection fraction (EF), time to aortic block, acute kidney injury, low cardiac output syndrome, and pulmonary complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the constructed prediction model was 0.98 ± 0.005, and the Youden index was 0.91. The validation results showed 97% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 93% accuracy. The expression of the model was Z = Smoking assignment* – 2.807 – 6.009*Diabetes assignment – 2.994*Previous cardiovascular surgery assignment – 0.129*Ejection fraction assignment + 0.071*Brain perfusion time assignment – 2.583*Acute kidney injury assignment – 2.916*Low cardiac output syndrome assignment – 3.461*Pulmonary related complications assignment + 20.576.Conclusion: The construction of an effective prediction model for the risk of delirium in patients after type A aortic stratification can help identify patients at high risk of POD early. It also provides a reference for healthcare professionals in the prevention and care of these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document