The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity

1992 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Richmond ◽  
W. C. Shaw ◽  
K. D. O'Brien ◽  
I. B. Buchanan ◽  
R. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models

2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Mayers ◽  
Allen R. Firestone ◽  
Robert Rashid ◽  
Katherine W.L. Vig
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Digital Models ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index outcomes for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ponduri ◽  
A. Pringle ◽  
H. Illing ◽  
P.A. Brennan
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

scholarly journals Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
SatinderP Singh ◽  
Komil Tintodana ◽  
Sanjeev Verma ◽  
Vinay Kumar ◽  
RajK Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

scholarly journals Evaluation of treatment changes produced by different orthodontic treatment modalities using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
SeenaNaik Eslavath ◽  
ThirumalNaik Mood ◽  
Manjunath Chekka ◽  
Kalyan SrinivasaAravind Narahari ◽  
Sreelaxmi Natta
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Treatment Changes ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

scholarly journals Orthodontic Treatment and Healthcare Goals: Evaluation of Multibrackets Treatment Results Using PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating)

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 473
Author(s):  
Maria Francesca Sfondrini ◽  
Paolo Zampetti ◽  
Giulia Luscher ◽  
Paola Gandini ◽  
José Luís Gandía-Franco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Treatment Quality ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
High Treatment ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

Background: The evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcomes using an objective method is important in order to maintain high treatment quality and final healthcare of patients. It allows professionals and university students to raise the level of the therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the orthodontic treatment outcomes in an Italian postgraduate School of Orthodontics using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. Methods: A sample of 50 patients treated in a postgraduate program was randomly selected. PAR index was used to assess pre-treatment and post-treatment study casts by two different examiners. The influence of different variables such as gender, treatment method, and need for extraction was statistically analyzed. Results: The average numerical reduction of PAR between the beginning and the end of the treatment was 18.74 (CI 95% 16.53–20.95), while the percentage reduction was 94.8% (CI 95% 91.91–97.68). All cases improved: 8% of patients resulted in the improved category, while 92% of them were in the greatly improved group. Conclusions: According to PAR index, the results showed that patients received a high-standard therapy. None of the factors studied influenced significantly the treatment outcomes.

scholarly journals Validity and Reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating Index Scored on Digital Models Using a Software Compared with Traditional Manual Scoring

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1646
Author(s):  
Arwa Gera ◽  
Shadi Gera ◽  
Michel Dalstra ◽  
Paolo M. Cattaneo ◽  
Marie A. Cornelis
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Minimum Standard ◽  
Digital Models ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating Index ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Digital Caliper ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of digital scoring of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and its components using a software, compared with conventional manual scoring on printed model equivalents. The PAR index was scored on 15 cases at pre- and post-treatment stages by two operators using two methods: first, digitally, on direct digital models using Ortho Analyzer software; and second, manually, on printed model equivalents using a digital caliper. All measurements were repeated at a one-week interval. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare PAR scores and its components between both methods and raters. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compute intra- and inter-rater reproducibility. The error of the method was calculated. The agreement between both methods was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots. There were no significant differences in the mean PAR scores between both methods and both raters. ICC for intra- and inter-rater reproducibility was excellent (≥0.95). All error-of-the-method values were smaller than the associated minimum standard deviation. Bland-Altman plots confirmed the validity of the measurements. PAR scoring on digital models showed excellent validity and reproducibility compared with manual scoring on printed model equivalents by means of a digital caliper.

American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Discrepancy Index and peer assessment rating (PAR) index with models versus photographs

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monir Horriat ◽  
Nicole Bailey ◽  
Baha Atou ◽  
Patrícia Bittencourt Santos ◽  
Fabio Henrique de Sa Leitao Pinheiro
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
American Board Of Orthodontics ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Discrepancy Index ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document