Comparative effectiveness and safety of edoxaban vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background and purpose The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban 60 mg and 30 mg for stroke prevention compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been well-described in a nationwide cohort of Caucasian patients treated in standard clinical practice. Methods We used Danish nationwide registries to identify patients with AF during June 2016 and November 2018 who were treated with edoxaban or warfarin and computed rates per 100 person-years of thromboembolic, all-cause mortality, and bleeding events using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach to account for baseline confounding. We used weighted pooled logistic regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing events between edoxaban 60 mg and warfarin users; edoxaban 30 mg was not included in formal comparisons. Results We identified 6451 AF patients, mean age was 72 years and 40% were females. A total of 1772 patients were treated with edoxaban 60 mg, 537 with edoxaban 30 mg, and 4142 with warfarin. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was similar between warfarin and edoxaban 60 mg with a score of 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2–4). In the inverse probability of treatment-weighted pseudo-population, the thromboembolic event rate for edoxaban 60 mg was 0.95 and 1.0 for warfarin, corresponding weighted HR of 1.00 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.59, 1.71); see Figure. Edoxaban 60 mg users were associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (3.93) compared to warfarin (6.04), with a HR of 0.64 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.88). The event rates for bleeding were 3.36 and 3.14, respectively; HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.77, 1.57) Conclusion Edoxaban 60 mg is a safe and effective treatment compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in routine clinical care for white European patients with AF, with non-significantly different risks for stroke and clinically relevant bleeding, but lower all-cause mortality. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Daiichi-Sankyo Europe GmbH. This funding source had no role in the design of this study, its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

Download Full-text

EXPRESS: Comparative effectiveness and safety of edoxaban vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study

International Journal of Stroke ◽

10.1177/17474930211029441 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 174749302110294

Author(s):

Peter Nielsen ◽

Mette Soegaard ◽

Martin Jensen ◽

Anne G Ording ◽

Gregory Lip

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Confidence Intervals ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Clinical Care ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Inverse Probability ◽

Standard Clinical Practice ◽

Hazard Ratios ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Event Rates

Background and purpose: The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban 60 mg and 30 mg for stroke prevention compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been well-described in a nationwide cohort of Caucasian patients treated in standard clinical practice. Methods: We used Danish nationwide registries to identify patients with AF during June 2016 and November 2018 who were treated with edoxaban or warfarin and computed rates per 100 person-years of thromboembolic, all-cause mortality, and bleeding events using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach to account for baseline confounding. We used weighted pooled logistic regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing events between edoxaban 60 mg and warfarin users; edoxaban 30 mg was not included in formal comparisons. Results: We identified 6451 AF patients, mean age was 72 years and 40% were females. A total of 1772 patients were treated with edoxaban 60 mg, 537 with edoxaban 30 mg, and 4142 with warfarin. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was similar between warfarin and edoxaban 60 mg with a score of 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4). In the inverse probability of treatment-weighted pseudo-population, the thromboembolic event rate for edoxaban 60 mg was 0.95 and 1.0 for warfarin, corresponding weighted HR of 1.00 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.59, 1.71). Edoxaban 60 mg users were associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (3.93) compared to warfarin (6.04), with a HR of 0.64 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.88). The event rates for bleeding were 3.36 and 3.14, respectively; HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.77, 1.57) Conclusion: Edoxaban 60 mg is a safe and effective treatment compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in routine clinical care for white European patients with AF, with non-significantly different risks for stroke and clinically relevant bleeding, but lower all-cause mortality.â

Download Full-text

Edoxaban treatment of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in routine clinical practice: 1-year results of the non-interventional Global ETNA-AF program

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0663 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

T Yamashita ◽

C.C Wang ◽

Y.-H Kim ◽

R De Caterina ◽

P Kirchhof ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Intracranial Haemorrhage ◽

Clinical Care ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Clinical Event ◽

Funding Source ◽

Private Company ◽

All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the need for appropriate anticoagulation increase with age. The benefit/risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban in elderly population with AF in regular clinical practice is therefore of particular interest. Purpose Analyses of Global ETNA-AF data were performed to report patient characteristics, edoxaban treatment, and 1-year clinical events by age subgroups. Methods Global ETNA-AF is a multicentre, prospective, noninterventional program conducted in Europe, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and other Asian countries. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and 1-year clinical event data were analysed in four age subgroups. Results Of 26,823 patients included in this analysis, 50.4% were ≥75 years old and 11.6% were ≥85 years. Increase in age was generally associated with lower body weight, lower creatinine clearance, higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, and a higher percentage of patients receiving the reduced dose of 30 mg daily edoxaban. At 1-year, rates of ISTH major bleeding and ischaemic stroke were generally low across all age subgroups. The proportion of intracranial haemorrhage within major bleeding events was similar across age groups. All-cause mortality increased with age more than cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion Data from Global ETNA-AF support the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in elderly AF patients (including ≥85 years) in routine clinical care with only a small increase in intracranial haemorrhage. The higher all-cause mortality with increasing age is not driven by cardiovascular causes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo

Download Full-text

Edoxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in routine clinical care: 1-year follow-up of the prospective observational ETNA-AF-Europe study

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy ◽

10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa079 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Joris R de Groot ◽

Thomas W Weiss ◽

Peter Kelly ◽

Pedro Monteiro ◽

Jean Claude Deharo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Clinical Care ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Routine Care ◽

European Medicines Agency ◽

Systemic Embolism ◽

Bleeding Events

Abstract Aims Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are safe and effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on the safety and efficacy of edoxaban in routine care are limited in Europe. We report 1-year outcomes in patients with AF treated with edoxaban in routine care. Methods and results ETNA-AF-Europe is a prospective, multicentre, post-authorization, observational study enrolling patients treated with edoxaban in 10 European countries, the design of which was agreed with the European Medicines Agency as part of edoxaban’s post-approval safety plan. Altogether 13 092 patients in 852 sites completed the 1-year follow-up [mean age: 73.6 ± 9.5 years; 57% male, mean follow-up: 352 ± 49 days (median: 366 days)]. Most patients had associated comorbidities (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 3.1 ± 1.4). Stroke or systemic embolism was reported in 103 patients (annualized event rate: 0.82%/year), and major bleeding events were reported in 132 patients (1.05%/year). Rates of intracranial haemorrhage were low [30 patients (0.24%/year)]. Death occurred in 442 patients (3.50%/year); cardiovascular (CV) death occurred in 206 patients (1.63%/year). The approved dosing of edoxaban was chosen in 83%. All-cause and CV mortality were higher in patients receiving edoxaban 30 mg vs. 60 mg, in line with the higher age and more frequent comorbidities of the 30 mg group. Major bleeding was also numerically more common in patients receiving edoxaban 30 mg vs. 60 mg. Conclusion The rates of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding are low in this large unselected cohort of high-risk AF patients routinely treated with edoxaban.

Download Full-text

Impact of antithrombotic therapy in the prognosis of atrial fibrillation patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0649 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

J.M Andreu Cayuelas ◽

S Raposeiras-Roubin ◽

E Fortuny Frau ◽

A Garcia Del Egido ◽

J Seller-Moya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Chronic Kidney Disease ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Antithrombotic Therapy ◽

Anticoagulation Therapy ◽

Bleeding Event ◽

Funding Source ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Introduction Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an elevated thromboembolic and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, so the decision of antithrombotic therapy is a challenge. Purpose To analyze mortality, embolic and bleeding events in patients with advanced CKD and AF. Methods Multicentric retrospective registry on patients with AF and advanced CKD (CKD-EPI <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). For death, multivariable Cox regression analysis was developed. For embolic and bleeding events, competing-risks regression based on Fine and Gray's proportional subhazards model was performed, being death the competing event Results We analysed 405 patients with advanced CKD and newly diagnosed AF. 57 patients were not treated with antithrombotic therapy (14.1%), 80 only with antiplatelet/s (19.8%), 211 only with anticoagulation (52.1%), and 57 with anticoagulant plus antiplatelet/s (14.1%). During a follow-up of 4.6±2.5 years, 205 died (50.6%), 34 had embolic events (8.4%) and 85 had bleeding outcomes (21.0%). Bleeding event rate was significantly lower in patients without antithrombotic therapy (Figure). After multivariate analysis, anticoagulant treatment was associated with higher bleeding rates, without differences in mortality or embolic events (Table). Conclusion Anticoagulation therapy was associated with a significant increase in bleeding events in patients with advanced CKD and newly diagnosed AF. None of the antithrombotic therapy regimens resulted in lower embolic events rate neither benefit in mortality. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This study was supported by an unconditional grant from BMS-Pfizer

Download Full-text

Relationship between frailty and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational research programme AF general long-term registry

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2834 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

M Proietti ◽

M Vitolo ◽

S Harrison ◽

G.A Dan ◽

A.P Maggioni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Frailty Index ◽

Primary Study ◽

Funding Source ◽

Private Company ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Increased Risk ◽

All Cause Mortality

Abstract Introduction Frailty is a major health determinant for cardiovascular disease. Thus far, data on frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. Aims To evaluate frailty in a large contemporary cohort of European AF patients, the relationship with oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription and with risk of all-cause death. Methods We analyzed patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. A 38-items frailty index (FI) was derived from baseline characteristics according to the accumulation of deficits model proposed by Rockwood and Mitnitsky. All-cause mortality was the primary study outcome. Results Out of the 11096 AF enrolled patients, data for evaluating frailty were available for 6557 (59.1%) patients who have been included in this analysis (mean [SD] age 68.9 [11.5], 37.7% females). Baseline median [IQR] CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED were 3 [2–4] and 1 [1–2], respectively. At baseline, median [IQR] FI was 0.16 (0.12–0.23), with 1276 (19.5%) patients considered “not-frail” (FI<0.10), 4033 (61.5%) considered “pre-frail” (FI 0.10–0.25) and 1248 (19.0%) considered “frail” (FI≥0.25). Age, female prevalence, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED progressively increased across the FI classes (all p<0.001). Use of OAC progressively increased among FI classes; after adjustments FI was not associated with OAC prescription (odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98–1.19 for each 0.10 FI increase). Conversely, FI was directly associated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.18–1.34 for each 0.10 FI increase) and inversely associated with non-VKA OACs (NOACs) use (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77–0.88). FI was significantly correlated with CHA2DS2-VASc (Rho= 0.516, p<0.001). Over a median [IQR] follow-up of 731 [704–749] days, there were 569 (8.7%) all-cause death events. Kaplan-Meier curves [Figure] showed an increasing cumulative risk for all-cause death according to FI categories. A Cox multivariable analysis, adjusted for age, sex, type of AF and use of OAC, found that increasing FI as a continuous variable was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.40–1.73 for each 0.10 FI increase). An association with all-cause death risk was found across the FI categories (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.23–2.38 and HR: 2.88, 95% CI: 2.02–4.12, respectively for pre-frail and frail patients compared to non-frail ones). FI was also predictive of all-cause death (c-index: 0.660, 95% CI: 0.637–0.682; p<0.001). Conclusions In a European contemporary cohort of AF patients the burden of frailty is significant, with almost 1 out of 5 patients found to be “frail”. Frailty influenced significantly the choice of OAC therapy and was associated with (and predictive of) all-cause death at follow-up. Kaplan-Meier Curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP programme, several companies have supported it with unrestricted grants.

Download Full-text

Advances in Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke Prevention

European Neurological Review ◽

10.17925/enr.2014.09.02.122 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 122

Author(s):

Pierre Amarenco ◽

Werner Hacke ◽

Bo Norrving ◽

Natalia Rost ◽

◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Anticoagulant Therapy ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Stroke Risk ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Factor Xa ◽

Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Patients At Risk

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) the risk of stroke is substantially increased, especially in those who are elderly (over 75 years) or have risk factors such as previous stroke, heart failure or hypertension. Stroke outcomes are also generally much worse in those with AF. Current guidelines indicate that any patient with AF and risk factors for stroke should receive anticoagulant therapy to limit their stroke risk. Despite these established recommendations, only 50 % of patients at risk receive anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and only 50 % of those are within the therapeutic range, indicating lack of adherence to the guidelines. Withholding anticoagulant therapy is mainly left to an individual physician’s choice, as shown in the ongoing GARFIELD registry of AF stroke prevention practice. Many physicians fear the risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) for which outcomes remain poor. Recent clinical studies have shown that the non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran and edoxaban) significantly reduce the risk of ICH and other bleeding events, while having non-inferior stroke prevention to warfarin. Use of these drugs, limiting exposure to aspirin and alcohol and controlling blood pressure have been shown to minimise ICH risk in large clinical trials and meta-analyses. Recent data from the Effective aNticoaGulation with factor xA next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation (ENGAGE AF)-TIMI 48 study showed that the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was non-inferior to well-managed warfarin for reducing all stroke risk, and significantly reduced haemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, ICH and death. These findings further support the case for using NOAC therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF and risk factors for stroke.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation: data from the Danish Nationwide Cohort

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy ◽

10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz070 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Peter Brønnum Nielsen ◽

Torben Bjerregaard Larsen ◽

Flemming Skjøth ◽

Mette Søgaard ◽

Gregory Y H Lip

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Clinical Effectiveness ◽

Systemic Embolism ◽

Antithrombotic Treatment ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Once Daily ◽

Randomized Controlled

Abstract Aims Edoxaban treatment for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has mainly been investigated in randomized controlled trials, and data reflecting clinical practice are limited. We ascertained the clinical effectiveness and safety of edoxaban 30 and 60 mg once daily among Danish patients with AF. Methods and results This was an observational study based on Danish nationwide registries collecting information for administrative purposes. From June 2016 through November 2018, we identified 3405 patients initiating edoxaban. After exclusions, 2285 AF patients were followed for the effectiveness outcome of thromboembolism (ischaemic stroke and/or systemic embolism) and bleeding outcomes (composite of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial haemorrhage), as well as bleeding requiring hospitalization. Population mean age was 75 years and 43% were female; 643 patients received the 30 mg edoxaban dosage regimen and 1642 initiated 60 mg edoxaban. During follow-up, we observed 41 thromboembolic events and 89 bleeding events of which 40 events required hospitalization. Among patients with 30 mg edoxaban, the rate (per 100 person-years) of thromboembolism was 2.07 vs. 1.62 for 60 mg edoxaban. Rates of bleeding were similar for the two dosages at ∼3.85. Bleeding requiring hospitalization occurred at a rate of 1.74 for 30 mg edoxaban and 1.69 with 60 mg edoxaban. Conclusion In this nationwide cohort of Caucasian AF patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention, the clinical effectiveness and safety were in line with data from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Studies investigating comparative effectiveness and safety for edoxaban in comparison with other choices of antithrombotic treatment options are needed.

Download Full-text

Impact of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at very low thromboembolic risk

Heart ◽

10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315873 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 845-851

Author(s):

Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge ◽

Anne-Céline Martin ◽

Deborah Siegal ◽

Karen Pieper ◽

Laura Illingworth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Antiplatelet Therapy ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Oral Anticoagulation ◽

Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Inverse Association ◽

Systemic Embolism ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Thromboembolic Risk ◽

All Cause Mortality

ObjectiveTo investigate reasons for and impact of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at very low thromboembolic risk.MethodsIndividuals with CHA2DS2-VASc score 0 (men) or 1 (women) from the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) were studied. Baseline characteristics according to OAC use were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Non-haemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were compared.ResultsFrom 2224 low CHA2DS2-VASc patients in GARFIELD-AF, 44% received OAC. In an adjusted model, increasing age up to 65 years (OR (95% CI)=1.31 (1.19 to 1.44)) and persistent AF (OR (95% CI)=3.25 (2.44 to 4.34)) or permanent AF (OR (95% CI)=2.29 (1.59 to 3.30)) versus paroxysmal/unclassified AF were associated with OAC use. Concomitant antiplatelet therapy (OR (95% CI)=0.21 (0.17 to 0.27)) was inversely associated. Crude incidence rates per 100 person-years over 2 years in patients on OAC versus not on OAC were 0.32 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.71) vs 0.30 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.63) for non-haemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism, 0.21 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.57) vs 0.17 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.46) for major bleeding, 0.26 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.64) vs 0.26 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.57) for cardiovascular mortality and 0.74 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.25) vs 0.99 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.49) for all-cause mortality.ConclusionsIn contrast to guideline recommendations, almost half of real-world patients with AF at a very low thromboembolic risk according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score receive OAC. Persistent or permanent AF and increasing age up to 65 years are associated with OAC use, while concomitant antiplatelet therapy shows an inverse association. Regardless whether patients received OAC therapy, few thromboembolic and bleeding events occur, highlighting the low risk of this population.

Download Full-text

Dabigatran for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

Hämostaseologie ◽

10.5482/ha-1196 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 32 (03) ◽

pp. 216-220 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

H.-C. Diener ◽

S. H. Hohnloser

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Relative Risk Reduction ◽

Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Similar Rate ◽

Thrombin Inhibitor ◽

Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽

Systemic Embolism ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Low Incidence

SummaryDabigatran is a novel direct thrombin inhibitor that has recently been approved for primary and secondary stroke prevention and prevention of systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. In the pivotal RE-LY study, dabigatran 110 mg BID was demonstrated to be associated with a stroke rate similar to that observed with warfarin (INR target 2.0 to 3.0), but with a lower rate of major haemorrhage. Dabigatran administered at a dose of 150 mg BID was significantly more effective in stroke prevention than warfarin and showed a similar rate of major hemorrhages. Of note, both dosages resulted in an approximately 60–70% relative risk reduction of haemorrhagic stroke. The dosage of 110 mg BID should be preferably used in patients aged 75–80 years or older as the rate of extracranial bleeding events tends to increase with dabigatran 150 mg BID above this age limit. In RE-LY, myocardial infarcts occurred at a very low incidence. There were numerically more myocardial infarcts in dabigatran-treated patients than in warfarin patients; however, other myocardial ischaemic events were similar in the three treatment arms.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation who refused anticoagulation: findings from the global GARFIELD-AF registry

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0517 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

P Apenteng ◽

D.A Fitzmaurice ◽

S Virdone ◽

A.J Camm ◽

K.A.A Fox ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

High Risk ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Funding Source ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Patient Refusal ◽

Event Rates

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a common cause of stroke and anticoagulation (AC) treatment reduces the risk of stroke. Reasons for patients with AF not receiving anticoagulation are generally attributed to the clinician decision, however in reality a proportion of patients refuse anticoagulation. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with AF who refused anticoagulation. Methods The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD-AF) was an international prospective observational study of patients ≥18 years with newly diagnosed AF and ≥1 investigator determined risk factor for stroke. We analysed two-year outcomes (unadjusted) of non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (stroke/SE), major bleeding and all-cause mortality in patients at high risk of stroke (men with CHA2DS2VASc≥2 and women with CHA2DS2VASc≥3) who did not received anticoagulation due to patient refusal, patients at high risk of stroke who received anticoagulation, and patients who were not on anticoagulation due to reasons other than patient refusal. Results Out of 43,154 patients, 13,283 (30.8%) are at the higher risk of stroke and did not received anticoagulation at baseline. The reason for not receiving anticoagulation was unavailable for 38.7% (5146/13283); of the patients with a known reason for not receiving anticoagulation, 12.5% (1014/8137) refused anticoagulation. Overall the study participants had a mean (SD) age of 72.2 (9.9) years and 50% were female. The median (Q1; Q3) CHA2DS2VASc score was 3.0 (3.0; 5.0) in patients who refused anticoagulation and 4.0 (3.0; 4.0) in patients who received anticoagulation. The median (Q1; Q3) HAS-BLED score was 1.0 (1.0; 2.0) in both groups. Of the patients who received anticoagulants, 59.7% received VKA and 40.3% received non-VKA oral anticoagulants. 79.4% of patients who refused anticoagulation were on antiplatelets. At two-year follow up the rate of events per 100 person-years (AC refused vs AC received) were: stroke/SE 1.42 vs 0.95 (p=0.04), major bleeding 0.62 vs 1.20 (p=0.02), and all-cause mortality 2.28 vs 3.90 (p=0.0004) (Figure). The event rates in patients who were not on anticoagulation for reasons other than patient refusal were stroke/SE 1.56, major bleeding 0.91, and all-cause mortality 5.49. Conclusion In this global real-world prospective study of patients with newly diagnosed AF, patients who refused anticoagulation had a higher rate of stroke/SE but lower rates of all-cause mortality and major bleeding than patients who received anticoagulation. While patient refusal of anticoagulation is an acceptable outcome of shared decision-making, clinically it is a missed opportunity to prevent AF related stroke. Patients' beliefs about AF related stroke and anticoagulation need to be explored. The difference in all-cause mortality warrants further investigation; further analysis will include adjusted results. Event rates at two years of follow-up Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The GARFIELD-AF registry is funded by an unrestricted research grant from Bayer AG.

Download Full-text